Clicca qui per scaricare

Sense-making of digital money among female peripheral agents: a short ethnographic study of informal workers in North India
Autori/Curatori: Anwesha Chakraborty, Jillet Sarah Sam 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 154 Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  19 P. 60-78 Dimensione file:  197 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2019-154004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

This essay compares how digital money is conceptualized by the government with sense-making and practices among women workers in North India. The government promotes and envisions a future with large sections of the population within the fold of ‘Digital India’. The policy rhetoric emphasizes capacity building, both in terms of improving infrastructure and training. However, in its positive narratives, the inclusion of peripherals in the government of the digital economy. Further, through focus group discussions and interviews carried out with women working at the intersection of formal and informal economy.

Questo saggio mette a confronto il modo in cui il denaro digitale è stato concettualizzato dal Governo Indiano e l’interpretazione che ne hanno dato le lavoratrici dell’India del Nord. Il Governo Indiano ha promosso e immaginato un futuro capace di portare ampie fasce della popolazione all’interno della "Digital India". La retorica politica ha enfatizzato l’idea di "capacity building", intesa sia in termini di miglioramento delle infrastrutture che di miglioramento delle opportunità di formazione capaci di consentire alla popolazione indiana in grado di utilizzare le transazioni digitali. Tuttavia, nel suo racconto positivo, l’inclusione delle donne è menzionata solo di sfuggita, rendendole soggetti periferici nella visione governativa di un’economia digitale. Il presente articolo stabilisce, attraverso focus group e interviste con donne che lavorano all’incrocio tra economia formale e informale, che le nostre intervistate sono agenti periferici a causa delle strutture economiche e sociali che le vincolano dall’accesso formale ed effettivo al denaro digitale.
Keywords: Denaro digitale, economia informale, denaro senza contanti, denaro di genere

  1. Bathija M. (2018). Internet Saathi: Improving Digital Literacy among Women. Forbes India. -- Text available at the website: Accessed January 13, 2019.
  2. Bhatia P. (2017). Story behind Surge in UPI Transactions and What Can Make It Truly Transformational. Economic Times. -- Text available at the website: -- Accessed January 13, 2019.
  3. Carruthers B.G., Espeland W.N. (1998). Money, Meaning, and Morality. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(10): 1384-1408., DOI: 10.1177/0002764298041010003
  4. Committee of Chief Ministers (2017). Interim Report of the Committee of Chief Ministers on #Digital Payments. New Delhi: Niti Aayog. -- Text available at the website: Accessed January 13, 2019.
  5. Dodd N. (2014). The Social Life of Money. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  6. Doron A. (2012). Mobile Persons: Cell Phones, Gender and the Self in North India. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 13(5): 414-433., DOI: 10.1080/14442213.2012.726253
  7. Doron A., Jeffrey R. (2013). The Great Indian Phone Book: How the Cheap Cell Phone Changes Business, Politics, and Daily Life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  8. Hart K. (1985). Informal Economy. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 10(2): 54-58.
  9. Kaka N., Madgavkar A., Manyika J., Bughin J., Parameswaran P. (2014). India’s Technology Opportunity: Transforming Work, Empowering People. India: McKinsey Global Institute. -- Text available at the website:
  10. Kini S. (2018). She Is Offline: India’s Digital Gender Divide. Live Mint. -- Text available at the website: Accessed January 13, 2019.
  11. Masika R., Bailur S. (2015). Negotiating Women’s Agency through ICTs: A Comparative Study of Uganda and India. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(1): 43-69., DOI: 10.1177/0971852414561615
  12. Maurer B., Taylor N., Rea S. (2013). ‘Bridges to Cash’: Channelling Agency in Mobile Money. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(1): 52-74., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12003
  13. Niti Aayog (2018). Digital Money: Trends, Issues and Opportunities. New Delhi: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. -- Text available at the website: Accessed January 13, 2019.
  14. Pahl J. (1999). Social Polarization in the Electronic Economy. The Sociological Review, 47(2): 87-106.
  15. Parish J. (2000). From the Body to the Wallet: Conceptualizing Akan Witchcraft at Home and Abroad. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(3): 487-500., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.00028
  16. Portes A., Castells M. (1989). World underneath: The Origins, Dynamics, and Effects of the Informal Economy. In: Benton L., Portes A., Castells M., eds., The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  17. Portes A., Haller W. (2010). The Informal Economy. In: Smelser N.J., Swedberg R., eds., The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Singh S. (1997). Marriage Money: The Social Shaping of Money in Marriage and Banking. St. Leonards, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.
  19. Singh S. (1998). Understanding the Use of Electronic Money: The Missing Factor in Policy. Melbourne, Australia: CIRCIT, RMIT and Center for Information Policy Research, Harvard University.
  20. Singh S. (2013). Globalization and Money: A Global South Perspective. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
  21. Singh S. (2016). Money, Migration and Family: India to Australia. New York: Nature America Inc.
  22. Sood N. (2017). Locating Gender in Digital India: Generating Feminist Liberation or Patriarchal Control. Master’s Thesis, Helsinki: University of Helsinki. -- Text available at the website: Accessed January 13, 2019.
  23. Subramanian S. (2008). Control and Access: The Everyday Dimensions of Property. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 42(1): 93-122., DOI: 10.1177/006996670704200105
  24. Svensson J., Larsson CW. (2016). Situated Empowerment: Mobile Phones Practices among Market Women in Kampala. Mobile Media and Communication, 4(2): 205-220., DOI: 10.1177/2050157915619212
  25. Vosloo S. (2018). Designing Inclusive Digital Solutions and Developing Digital Skills: Guidelines. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Digital Library. -- Text available at the website: Accessed January 13, 2019.
  26. Zelizer V.A. (1989). The Social Meaning of Money: ‘Special Monies’. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2): 342-377.
  27. Zelizer V.A. (2017). The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief & Other Currencies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Anwesha Chakraborty, Jillet Sarah Sam, Il significato della moneta digitale per i soggetti periferici: un breve studio et-nografico sulle lavoratrici informali nell’India settentrionale in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 154/2019, pp. 60-78, DOI:10.3280/SL2019-154004


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche