Clicca qui per scaricare

Una inclusione esclusiva. Hong Kong (sar), Cina
Titolo Rivista: TERRITORIO 
Autori/Curatori: Anna Vincenza Nufrio, José Miguel Fernández Güell 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 88 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  11 P. 109-119 Dimensione file:  2519 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2019-088017
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Questo saggio analizza, con un approccio storico-critico e interdisciplinare, come la mutevolezza delle relazioni tra territorio, potere, governance e identità sociale si siano espresse nel tempo e su questioni territoriali tra Hong Kong e la Cina. Si osserva come la pratica di continua (ri)definizione del confine internazionale, risultato della flessibile geopolitica coloniale britannica, abbia portato all’applicazione di un paradigma di sviluppo centroperiferia e, a scala urbana, all’adozione di modelli di ‘segregazione spaziale’ e di ‘inclusione sociale esclusiva’, oltre che alla progettazione e produzione di spazi di vita di qualità solo per i gruppi sociali privilegiati.


Keywords: Frontier Closed Area; pianificazione transfrontaliera; studi di frontiera

  1. Agnew J., 2008, ≪Borders on the Mind: Re-framing Border Thinking≫. Ethics and Global Politics, 1, 4: 175-191.
  2. Appadurai A., 1996, ≪Sovereignty Without Territoriality: Notes for a Postnational Geography≫. In: Yaeger P. (ed.), The Geography of Identity. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 40-58.
  3. Balibar E., 1998, ≪The borders of Europe≫. In: Cheah P., Robbins B. (eds.), Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 216-229.
  4. Boggs W., 1940, International Boundaries. A Study of Boundary Functions and Problems. New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Breitung W., 2009, ≪Macau Residents as Border People-A Changing Border Regime from a Sociocultural Perspective≫. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38, 1: 102-127 (online).
  6. Breitung W., 2011, ≪Borders and the City: Intra-urban Boundaries in Guanzhou (China)≫. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30, 4: 55-61.
  7. Bremmer A.G., Lung D.P.Y., 2003, ≪Spaces of Exclusion: The Significance of Cultural Identity in the Formation of European Residential Districts in British Hong Kong, 1877-1904≫. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 2: 223-252.
  8. Brigham A.P., 1919, ≪Principles in the Determination of Boundaries ≫. Geographical Review, 7, 4: 201-219.
  9. Brunet-Jailly E., 2010, ≪The State of Borders and Borderlands studies 2009: A Historical View and View from the Journal of Borderland Studies≫. Eurasia Border Review, 1, 1: 1-15. -- http://srch.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/BorderStudies/en/publications/review/data/ebr/1_Brunet7.pdf (ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  10. Carrol J.M., 1999, ≪Chinese Collaboration in the Making of British Hong Kong≫. In: Ngo T-W., Hong Kong’s History. State and society under Colonial Rule. London: Routledge, 13-29.
  11. Law W.S., 2009, Collaborative Colonial Power. The Making of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  12. Chadwick O., 1882, Mr. Chadwick’s Reports on the Sanitary Condition of Hong Kong. With Appendices and Plans. Hong Kong: Colonial Office. -- https://ia902603.us.archive.org/5/items/b2136591x/b2136591x.pdf (ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  13. Chan W.K., 1991, The making of Hong Kong Society: Three Studies of Class Formation in the Early Hong Kong. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Chan R.C.K., Yao, Y.M., Zhao S.X.B., 2003, ≪Self-help Housing Strategy for Temporary Populations in Guanzhou≫. Habitat International, 27, 1: 9-35., 10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00033-4DOI: 10.1016/S0197-3975(02)00033-4
  15. Chen X., 2005, As Border Bend. Transnational Spaces on the Pacific Rim, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  16. Cheng A.K.C., 2012, The Blame Game: How Colonial Legacies in Hong Kong Shape Street Vendor and Public Space Policies, Tesi di Master in Urban Studies and Planning. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. -- http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73700 (ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  17. Cutberth A.R., McKinnel K.G., 1997, ≪Ambiguous space, ambiguous rights-corporate power and social control in Hong Kong≫. Cities, 14, 5: 295-311., 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00020-6DOI: 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00020-6
  18. Deleuze G., Guattari F., 2010, Millepiani. Capitalismo e Schizofrenia. Roma: Castelvecchi.
  19. Elden S., 2013, ≪Secure the Volume: Vertical Geopolitics and the Depth of Power≫. Political Geography, 34: 52-54.
  20. Endacott G. B., 1964, An Eastern Entrepot. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  21. Epstein C.F., 1992, ≪Thinkerbells and Pinups: The Construction and Reconstruction of Gender Boundaries at Work≫. In: Lamont M., Fourier M. (eds.), Cultivating Differences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 233-256.
  22. Faure D., 2005, ≪The Common People in Hong Kong History: Their Livelihood and Aspirations Until the 1930s≫. In: Lee P.T. (ed.), Colonial Hong Kong and Modern China. Interaction and Reintegration. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 9-38.
  23. Fontanari E., 2016, ≪Soggettivita en transit. (Im)mobilita dei rifugiati in Europa tra sistemi di controllo e pratiche quotidiane di attraversamento dei confini≫. Mondi Migranti, 1: 39-60.
  24. Franco M., 2016, L’assedio. Come l’immigrazione sta cambiando il volto dell’Europa e la nostra vita quotidiana. Milano: Mondadori.
  25. Grosfoguel R., 2002, ≪Colonial Difference, Geopolitics of Knowledge and global Coloniality in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist World-System≫. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 25, 3: 203-224.
  26. Howell P., 2009, Geographies of Regulation: Policing Prostitution in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Hui P-K., 1999, ≪Compradors Politics and Middleman Capitalism≫. In: Ngo T-W. (ed.), Hong Kong’s History. State and society under Colonial Rule. London: Routledge, 30-45.
  28. Ip I.C., 2004, ≪Welfare Good or Colonial Citizenship? A Case Study of Early Resettlement Housing≫. In: Ku A.S., Pun N. (eds.), Remaking citizenship in Hong Kong: Community, nation and the global city. Curzon: Routledge, 37-53.
  29. Kahler M., Walter B.F., 2006, Territoriality and conflict in an era of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Kymlicka W., 2006, Fronteras Territoriales. Madrid: Trotta.
  31. Lam J., 2002, ≪Globalization and Fiscal Management in Hong Kong≫. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 4, 1: 62-83., 10.1111/1540-6210.00275DOI: 10.1111/1540-6210.00275
  32. Lamont M., Molnar V., 2002, ≪The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences≫. Annual Reviews of sociology, 28, 1: 167-195.
  33. Lee L.O-F., 2010, City Between Worlds: My Hong Kong. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  34. Lethbridge H.J., 1969, ≪Hong Kong under Japanese Occupation: Changes in Social Structure≫. In: Jarvie C., Agassi J. (eds.), Hong Kong: A Society in Transition. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 77-128.
  35. Mar P., 2002, Accommodating Places: A Migrant Ethnography of two Cities (Hong Kong and Sidney), tesi di Dottorato, Department of Anthropology. Sidney: University of Sidney. -- https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/1209 (ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  36. McGee T.G., 1967, The Southeast Asian City. Londra: Bell.
  37. Newman D., 2006, ≪The Resilience of Territorial Conflict in an Era of Globalization≫. In: Kahler, Walter (2006: 85-110).
  38. McDonogh G., Wong C.H.Y., 2010, ≪Istantanee di una citta divisa. Spazi della differenza nella Hong Kong coloniale e post-coloniale≫. In: Nufrio A.V. (a cura di), Le frontiere infra-architettoniche. Barcelona, l’Avana, Hong Kong. Ginevra: Nomad//Yuzu-Lab.
  39. O’Dowd L., 2003, ≪The Changing Significance of European Borders≫. In: O’Dowd L., Anderson J., Wilson T. (eds.), New Borders for a New Europe. London: Routledge, 13-36.
  40. Ohmae K., 1995, The End of the Nation-State. New York: Free Press.
  41. Paasi A., Prokkola E.K., 2008, ≪Regional Dynamics, Cross-border Work and Everyday Life at the Finnish-Swedish Border≫. Space and Polity, 12, 1: 13-29., 10.1080/13562570801969366DOI: 10.1080/13562570801969366
  42. Paasi A., 2009a, ≪The Resurgence of the ‘Region’ and ‘Regional Identity’: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Observations on the Regional Dynamics in Europe≫. Review of International Studies, 35, S1: 121-146., 10.1017/S0260210509008456DOI: 10.1017/S0260210509008456
  43. Paasi A., 2009b, ≪Bounded Spaces in a ‘Borderless World’: Border Studies, Power and the Anatomy of Territory≫. Journal of Power, 2, 2: 213-234., 10.1080/17540290903064275DOI: 10.1080/17540290903064275
  44. Pratt M., 2010, ≪The Scholar-Practitioner Interface in Boundary Studies≫. Eurasia Border Review, 1, 1: 29-36.
  45. Robbins A., 2003, ≪Almost Liberal: The British Government of Hong Kong in the Mid-Nineteenth Century≫. Stanford Undergraduate Research Journal, Spring: 32-38. -- https://web.stanford.edu/group/journal/cgibin/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2012/09/Robbins_Hum_2003.pdf (ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  46. Rosneau J.N., 1999, Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Rumford C., 2006, ≪Theorizing Borders≫. European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 2: 155-169., 10.1177/1368431006063330DOI: 10.1177/1368431006063330
  48. Sassen S., 2013, ≪When the Center no Longer Holds: Cities as Frontier Zones≫. Cities, 34, 2: 67-70.
  49. Scott J.W., 2012, ≪European Politics of Borders. Borders Symbolism and Cross-Border Cooperation≫. In: Wilson T. M., Donnan H. (eds.), A Companion to Border Studies. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 83-89.
  50. Sloterdijk P., 2004, Spheres III: Foams, Plural Spherology. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Smart A., Tang W-S. tang, 2005, ≪Irregular Trajectories: Illegal building in Mainland China and Hong Kong≫. In: Ma L.J.C., Wu F. (eds.), Restructuring the Chinese city: Changing Society, Economy and Space. London: Routledge, 71-86.
  51. Strange S., 1996, The Retreat of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Tang W-Y, 1996, Hong Kong: An Unidentified Subject Under Colonialism, tesi di Master, Institute of Education, The University of Hong Kong. -- http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/40404/1/FullText.pdf?accept=1(ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  53. Treagear T.R., Berry L., 1959, The Development of Hongkong and Kowloon as Told in Maps. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  54. Tse C.K.C., 2006, The Fortified Line: Police Observation Posts in the Frontier Closed Area at the Border of Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Tesi di Master, Faculty of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong. -- https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/56063/3/FullText.pdf?accept=1 (ultimo accesso: 2019.02.20).
  55. Wue R., Lai E.K., Waley-Cohen J., 1997, Picturing Hong Kong: Photography 1855-1910. New York: Asia Society Galleries.
  56. Yeoh B.S.A., 2003, Contesting Space in Colonial Singapore: Power Relations and the Urban Built Environment. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
  57. Yin L.H., 2010, ≪Pre-war Tong Lau: A Hong Kong Shophouse Typology≫. Documento d’archivio, d’uso ristretto dell’Hong Kong Antiquities and Monuments Office, Hong Kong Development Bureau. Commissioner for Heritage’s Office, 19 April, 1-17.
  58. Vinokurov E.Y., 2007, A Theory of Enclaves, Lanham: Lexington Books.
  59. Zanini P., 2002, Significati del confine. I limiti naturali, storici, mentali. Milano: Mondadori.

Anna Vincenza Nufrio, José Miguel Fernández Güell, in "TERRITORIO" 88/2019, pp. 109-119, DOI:10.3280/TR2019-088017

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche