Click here to download

Relational dynamics and functionality of families with mothers practing prolonged breast feeding
Author/s: Eugenia Treglia , Rosella Tomassoni 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  29 Pg. 431-459 FullText PDF:  283 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2019-003001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Introduction. Several studies highlight the presence of particular functioning styles in families where mothers practice prolonged breastfeeding; this practice would be associated with a condition of father's marginality, with maternal symbiotic tendencies to defer the normal process of separation and to a dysfunction of the couple relationship (Coslovi, Celestini, Fornarola, Maragliano, & Chiusuri, 1999). Methodology. The research design used is with a non-equivalent control group, since the subjects are not randomly assigned to the two groups but on the basis of pre-existing characteristics (McBurney, 1996). The independent variable taken into consideration is the presence / absence in families of a breast-fed child over 15 months. The dependent variable is the functioning of the couple. For the study of the explanatory characteristics of the family functioning processes we have used the Circumflex Model of the Conjugal and Family Systems proposed and developed by Olson et al. (Olson, Russell, & Sprenkle, 1983). Aims. To compare the perceptions of the two groups with regard to some variables of family functioning examined as marital satisfaction, the level of cohesion and adaptability (as defined within the theoretical model of Olson). Sample: 90 couples with young children took part in the study for a total of 180 subjects. The experimental group (44 couples) is composed of families in which there is a toddler of at least 15 months still breastfed by the mother; the control group (46 couples) is made up of families with children weaned within the first year of life (46 couples). Tools. Both members of the couple were given a questionnaire for the collection of personal data and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales Questionnaire (FACES III, 1985) in its two Real and Ideal versions to investigate the functioning of the couple. Results. The analysis of the frequencies shows that the percentage of couples that falls within the extreme types of functioning provided by the model is greater in the experimental group (27%) than in the control group (13%). Within the control group there are no couples that are on the disengagement side, while this type reaches a total frequency of 22.6% in the experimental group. In the experimental group the Invised / chaotic type is most represented reaching a frequency of 18.2% compared to 13% observed in the control group pairs. The analysis of variance reveals a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the two groups in the real cohesion dimension (F = 4.780; p <0.031) with a higher mean score in the control group (M = 42.00; SD = 4.222) compared to the group experimental (M = 39.43; SD = 6.697). Also the difference between the Scores of Discrepancy or Family Satisfaction between the two considered groups reaches statistical significance (F = 5.121; p <0.026) and observing the averages we find a higher average Discrepancy score in the pairs of the experimental group (M = 8.32 SD = 14.475) compared to controls (M = 2.37 SD = 10.184), which would indicate a higher level of marital dissatisfaction in the pairs of the experimental group. There is a statistically significant difference, within the experimental group, also between the average scores of men and women in the ideal adaptability dimension (F = 0.047; p <0.047) presenting the women of this group a higher average score ( M = 40.68; SD = 5.037) compared to men (M = 36.50; DS = 8.146). Correlational analysis reveals, within the experimental group, a negative linear relationship between the Family Satisfaction score and the age of the children (r = -0.462) which indicates a decrease in family satisfaction with the increase in the age of the children. In the control group, on the other hand, there is a statistically significant relationship between the duration of the marriage and the score of family satisfaction (r = 0.44) which indicates how the increase in the duration of the marriage increases conjugal satisfaction at the same time. Discussion and Conclusion. The data show that in families with prolonged breastfeeding mothers, there is a greater tendency to place themselves at the extremes of the Olson model and therefore to have more difficulty adapting to changes during the life cycle. These families have a combination of low / high cohesion with low / high adaptability. For the couples of the experimental group that are in the extreme type of enmeshed/chaotic (18.2%) we can hypothesize a difficult transition to parenthood, a poor differentiation between spouses and symbiotic and cohesive tendencies that would also extend to the child and that would justify the use of prolonged breastfeeding. For couples who are instead on the side of disengagement we can hypothesise an emotional distance and a poor involvement of the spouse in the care of the child, which then becomes the object of affective hyper-investment by the mothers. The analysis of the data also showed that the group with prolonged breastfeeding mothers experiences higher levels of dissatisfaction in the marital relationship compared to the control group; these mothers also have lower average scores than men of the same group in the dimension of marital satisfaction. The lack of satisfaction in the couple relationship could push these mothers to make compensatory use of breastfeeding. The results of the correlational analysis are in line with the data. In fact couples with prolonged breastfeeding mothers experience less marital satisfaction as the age of the children increases. On the other hand, in couples with regularly weaned children, marital satisfaction is increased at the same time as the duration of marriage increases.
Keywords: Prolonged breastfeeding, couples functioning, marital satisfaction, symbiotic tendencies

  1. Ahlborg, T., Dahlof, L. G., & Hallberg, L. R-M. (2005). Quality of the intimate and sexual relationship in first-time parents six month after delivery. The Journal of Sex Research, 42, 2., DOI: 10.1080/00224490509552270
  2. Belsky, J., Spanier, G., & Rovine, M. (1983). Stability and change in marriage across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 567-577., DOI: 10.2307/351661
  3. Belsky, J., Lang, M., & Rovine, M. (1985). Stability and change in marriage across the transition to parenthood: a second study. Journal of marriage and the family, 47, 855-865., DOI: 10.2307/352329
  4. Belsky, J., & Pensky, E. (1988). Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage and Family Review, 12, 133-156.
  5. Cigoli, V., & Galbusera, C. (1980). Coppie in attesa del primo figlio: come si programma la vita. Terapia familiare, 7, 37-52.
  6. Claxton, A., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2008). No fun anymore: leisure and marital quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 28-43.
  7. Coslovi, R., Celestini, D., Fornarola, D., Maragliano, G., Chiusuri, M. R. (1998). Attualità sull’allattamento al seno e sullo svezzamento del lattante. Età evolutiva, 61, 122-125.
  8. Cowan, C.P., & Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations. Cutrona, C. E. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9, 3-14.
  9. Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., & Gardner, K. A. (2005). The Relationship Enhancement Model of Social Support. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 73-95). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association., DOI: 10.1037/11031-004
  10. Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 601-619.
  11. Doss, B. D., & Rhoades, G. K. (2017). The transition to parenthood: impact on couples’ romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13(25). ).
  12. Engfer, A. (1988). The interrelatedness of marriage and the mother-child relationship.
  13. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson Hinde (Eds.). Relationships within families: Mutual influences (104-118). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  14. Farneti, A., & Monti, M. (1998). L’allattamento prolungato per più di due anni: un fenomeno recente. Età evolutiva, 61, 106-115.
  15. Galimberti, C., & Farina, M. (1990). FACES III uno strumento per la ricerca e l’osservazione clinica della famiglia. Vita e Pensiero, 39, 10.
  16. Hopkins, J., Marcus, M., & Campbell, S. B. (1984). Postpartum depression: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 498-515., DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.498
  17. Katz-Wise, S. L., Priess, H. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 46, 18-28.
  18. Kluwer, E. S., & Johnson, M. D. (2007). Conflict frequency and relationship quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1089-1106.
  19. Koivunen, J. M., Rothaupt, J. W., & Wolfgram, S. M. (2009). Gender dynamics and role adjustment during the transition to parenthood: Current perspectives. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 17, 323-328., DOI: 10.1177/1066480709347360
  20. Kuersten-Hogan, R. (2010). Cos’è la cogenitorialiltà e perché è così importante. In J. P. McHale (Ed.), La sfida della cogenitorialità (pp. 1-22). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  21. La Rossa, R., & La Rossa, M.(1981). Transition to parenthood. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
  22. Levy-Schiff, R.(1994). Individual and contextual correlates of marital change across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 30, 591-601.
  23. Malagoli Togliatti, M., & Lubrano Lavadera, A. (2002). Dinamiche relazionali e ciclo di vita della famiglia. Bologna: il Mulino.
  24. Mazzoni, S., & Tafà, M., (2007). L’interosggettività della famiglia. Procedure multimetodo per l’osservazione e la valutazione delle relazioni familiari. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Meyer, D., Robinson, B., Cohn, A., Gildenblatt, L., & Barkley, S., (2016). The Possible Trajectory of Relationship Satisfaction Across the Longevity of a Romantic Partnership. The Fami l y Journal, 2 4 , 4, ( 3 4 4 ) ., DOI: 10.1177/1066480716670141
  25. McGoldrick, M., Heiman, M., & Carter, B. (1995). I mutamenti nel ciclo di vita della famiglia: una prospettiva sulla normalità. In F. Walsh (a cura di), Ciclo vitale e dinamiche familiari. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  26. Miller, R. B. (2000). Misconceptions about the U-shaped curve of marital satisfaction over the life course. Family Science Review, 13, 60-73.
  27. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families e Family Therapy. Cambridge Moss: Harvard University Press. Trad. It. Famiglie e terapie della famiglia. Roma: Astrolabio, 1976.
  28. Mitnick, D. M., Heyman, R. E., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2009). Changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 848-852.
  29. Moller, K., Hwang, C. P., & Wickberg, B. (2008). Couple relationship and transition to parenthood: Does workload at home matter? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26, 57-68., DOI: 10.1080/02646830701355782
  30. Nelson, J. A., O’Brien, M., Blankson, A. N., Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2009). Family stress and parental responses to children’s negative emotions: Tests of the spillover, crossover, and compensatory hypotheses. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 671-679.
  31. Olson, D. H. (1986). Circumplex Model VII: validation studies and Faces III. Family Process, vol. 18, 337- 351.
  32. Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M. & Wilson, M. (1989). Family inventories. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University
  33. of Minnesota. Olson, D. H., Russel, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex Model VI: Theoretical update. Family Process, 2 2 , 69-83.
  34. Onodera, A. (2005). Marital changes during the transition to parenthood. Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 15-25.
  35. Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M., & Hunsberger, B. (2000). Thinking ahead: complexity ofexpectations and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality, 68, 253-278., DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.00097
  36. Porter, C. L., & Hsu, H. (2003). First-time mothers’ perceptions of efficacy during the transition to motherhood: Links to infant temperament. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 54-64., DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.17.1.54
  37. Preisner, K., Neuberger, F., Posselt, L., & Kratz, F. (2018). Motherhood, Employment, and Life Satisfaction: Trends in Germany Between 1984 and 2015, Journal of Marriage and Family, 8(5), 21-27.
  38. Pollmann-Schult, M. (2014). Parenthood and Life Satisfaction: Why Don't Children Make People Happy? Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 35-48.
  39. Scabini, E. (1995). Psicologia sociale della famiglia. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. Simonelli, A., Fava Viziello, G., Bighin, M., De Palo, F., & Petech, E. (2007). La transizione alla triade fra assunzione della genitorialità e riorganizzazione della coppia. Età Evolutiva, 86, 92-99.
  40. Van Egerenv, L. A. (2004). The development of the co-parenting relationship over the transition to parenthood. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25, 453-477.
  41. Waldron, H., & Routh, D. K. (1981). The effects of the first child on the marital relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 785-788., DOI: 10.2307/351335

Eugenia Treglia , Rosella Tomassoni, Relational dynamics and functionality of families with mothers practing prolonged breast feeding in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 3/2019, pp. 431-459, DOI:10.3280/RIP2019-003001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content