Clicca qui per scaricare

Climate risk for the self and community: The role of Nature Relatedness, Personal Control and Mindfulness
Titolo Rivista: RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA' 
Autori/Curatori: Francesca Scafuto 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  20 P. 89-108 Dimensione file:  311 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RISS2019-002008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The present pilot and correlational study illustrates the role of mindfulness, nature relatedness and personal control in predicting climate change perceived risk. It was hypothesized that the two components of risk perception for climate change (CCR), one targeting self and local community (CCRS) and one targeting global community (CCRG), would be differently correlated to all the variables; mindfulness and perceived personal control would significantly predict climate risk above all for self and local community and relatedness with nature (NR) would predict climate change risk and mediate the relationship between mindfulness and risk. U.S. College students (N = 87) were provided with the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form (FFMQ-SF), Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS) and measures for Climate Risk and Personal control, adapted by previous author’s studies. The results confirmed partially the first and the second hypothesis, and totally the third one. CCRG showed no significant correlation with any facet of mindfulness and only showed a positive correlation with NR-S (Self) and NR-P (Perspective), while CCRS was negatively correlated with three facets of mindfulness (Nonjudging, Describing and Acting with awareness), positively correlated with one facet (Observing) and all the dimensions of NR. Personal control was positively correlated only with Mindfulness. In the regression model, CCRS was predicted by Mindfulness and NR while CCRG was predicted by the only NR. Nature Relatedness also mediated the relationship between Mindfulness and CCRS. Theoretical implications of these results, limitations of the study, such as the little sample size, and future research paths are discussed.


Keywords: Climate Change Risk, Mindfulness, Nature Relatedness, Personal Control, Self-Risk Perception; Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form (FFMQ-SF)

  1. Allen J. B. and Ferrand J. L. (1999). Environmental Locus of Control, Sympathy, and Proenvironmental Behavior: A Test of Geller’s Actively Caring Hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31(3): 338-353,, DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972137
  2. Amel E. L., Manning C. M., and Scott B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1): 14-25,
  3. Baer R. A., Smith G. T., Lykins E., Button D., Krietemeyer J., Sauer S., … Williams J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3): 329-342,, DOI: 10.1177/1073191107313003
  4. Bai H. and Scutt G. (2009).Touching the Earth with the Heart of Enlightened Mind: The Buddhist Practice of Mindfulness for Environmental Education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14(1): 92-106.
  5. Ballew M., Marlon J., Rosenthal S., Gustafson A., Kotcher J., Maibach E. and Leiserowitz A. (2019). Do younger generations care more about global warming?. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
  6. Barbaro N. and Pickett S. M. (2015). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness with nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93: 137-142,
  7. Barrett B., Grabow M., Middlecamp C., Mooney M., Checovich M.M., Converse A.K., Gillespie B. and Yates J. (2016). Mindful Climate Action: Health and Environmental Co-Benefits from Mindfulness-Based Behavioral Training. Sustainability, 8: 10-40,
  8. Baum A., Fleming R. and Singer J. E. (1983). Coping with Victimization by Technological Disaster. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2): 117-138,
  9. Biesbroek G.R., Klostermann J.E.M., Termeer C.J.A.M. and Kabat P. (2013). On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change, 13(5): 1119-1129,
  10. Bohlmeijer E., Ten Klooster P. M., Fledderus M., Veehof M. and Baer R. (2011). Psychometric Properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Depressed Adults and Development of a Short Form. Assessment, 18(3): 308-320,, DOI: 10.1177/1073191111408231
  11. Brown K.W. and Ryan R. M. (2003). Mindful Attention Awereness Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 822-848.
  12. Canty J. M., Amster R., Anthony C., Benally S., Dellinger D. and Rooks B. (2011). Race, environment, and sustainability (part one). Sustainability, 4: 238-241.
  13. Carrus G., Passafaro P., Bonnes M. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choice in ecological behaviours: the case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28: 51-62.
  14. Conn S. A. (1998). Living in the earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist, 26(1-3): 179-198,, DOI: 10.1080/08873267.1998.9976972
  15. Dunlap R. E., Van Liere K. D., Mertig A. G. and Jones R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 425-442,, DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176
  16. Edelstein M. R. (2004). Contaminated Communities: Coping with Residential Toxic Exposure (Second Edition). Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.
  17. Ghiroldi S., Scafuto F., Montecucco F.N. and Iani L. (in press). Effectiveness of a school-based mindfulness intervention on children’s internalizing and externalizing problems: the Gaia project. Submitted to Mindfulness.
  18. Grabow M., Bryan T., Checovich M.M., Converse A.K., Middlecamp C., Mooney M., Torres E.R., Younkin S.G., and Barrett B. (2018). Mindfulness and Climate Change Action: A Feasibility Study. Sustainability, 10: 1508,
  19. Greenway R. (2011). Can a bigger map save us? A commentary on Esbjörn-Hargens and Michael Zimmerman’s Integral Ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Ecopsychology, 3: 159-163,
  20. Grob A. (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3): 209-220., DOI: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90004-7
  21. Hart P. S., Nisbet E. C. and Myers T. A. (2015). Public attention to science and political news and support for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 5: 541-545.
  22. Heckhausen J. and Schulz R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychol. Rev., 102: 284-304.
  23. Homburg A., Stolberg A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26: 1-14.
  24. Hornsey M. J., Harris E. A., Bain P. G. and Fielding K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6: 622-626.
  25. Howell A. J., Dopko R. L., Passmore H. A. and Buro K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2): 166-171,
  26. Hunecke M., and Richter N. (2019). Mindfulness, Construction of Meaning, and Sustainable Food Consumption. Mindfulness, 10(3): 446-458,
  27. Iani L., Lauriola M. and Cafaro V. (2017). The assessment of mindfulness skills: the “what” and the “how.” Journal of Mental Health, 1-8,, DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1385738
  28. Judd C. M. and Kenny D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating Mediation in Treatment Evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5): 602-619,, DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8100500502
  29. Kabat-Zinn J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York, USA: Delacorte.
  30. Kaiser F. G., Ranney M., Hartig T. and Bowler P. A. (1999). Ecological Behavior, Environmental Attitude, and Feelings of Responsibility for the Environment. European Psychologist, 4(2): 59-74.
  31. Kaplan S. and Kaplan R. (2003). Health, Supportive Environments, and the Reasonable Person Model. American Journal of Public Health, 93: 1484-1489,, DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1484
  32. Kortenkamp K. and Moore C. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3): 261-272,
  33. Lachman M. E. and Weaver S. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and wellbeing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 74; 763-773.
  34. Langer E. J. and Moldoveanu M. (2000). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1): 1-9,, DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00148
  35. Lazarus R. S. and Launier R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In: Lawrence Pervin A., and Lewis M. (eds.). Perspectives in Interactional Psychology, pp. 287-327, NewYork: Plenum.
  36. Lee J.E.C. and Lemyre L. (2009). A social-cognitive perspective of terrorism risk perception and individual response in Canada. Risk analysis, 29(9): 1265-1280.
  37. MacKinnon D. P., Krull J. L. and Lockwood C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4): 173-181,, DOI: 10.1023/A:1026595011371
  38. MacKinnon D.P., Krull J.P and Lockwood C.M. (2000) Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Prev Sci., 1(4): 173,
  39. Mayer F. S. and Frantz C. M. (2004). The Connectedness with Nature Scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24: 503-515,
  40. Mayer F. S., Frantz C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal E. and Dolliver K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness with nature. Environment and Behavior, 41: 607-643,, DOI: 10.1177/0013916508319745
  41. Nisbet E.K., Zelenski J.M. and Murphy S.A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection With Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(05): 715-740,, DOI: 10.1177/0013916508318748
  42. Oskamp S., Harrington M. J., Edwards T. C., Sherwood D. L., Okuda S. M. and Swanson D. C. (1991). Factors Influencing Household Recycling Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23(4): 494-519,, DOI: 10.1177/0013916591234005
  43. Perrin J.L. and Benassi V.A. ( 2009). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4): 434-440,
  44. Pooley J. A. and O’Connor M. (2000). Environmental Education and Attitudes: Emotions and Beliefs are What is Needed. Environment and Behavior, 32(5): 711-723,, DOI: 10.1177/0013916500325007
  45. Preacher K. J. and Hayes A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 879-891,
  46. Scafuto F. and La Barbera F. (2016). Protest Against Waste Contamination in the ‘Land of Fires’: Psychological Antecedents for Activists and Non-activists. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
  47. Scafuto F., Sodano V. and La Barbera F. (2018). What drives recycling behavior? The role of social trust, perceived risk and self-efficacy. Quality-Access to Success, 19(s1): 463-469.
  48. Schultz P. W., Shriver C., Tabanico J. J. and Khazian A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24: 31-42,
  49. Schultz W. P. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4): 327-339.
  50. Sjöberg L. (2002). Attitudes toward technology and risk: Going beyond what is immediately given. Policy Sciences, 35: 379-400.
  51. Slovic P., McDaniels T. and Axelrod L. J. (1996). Perceptions of risk to humans and to nature: a research plan. In: Giulio R. T. D. and Monosson E. (Eds). Interconnections Between Human and Ecosystem Health. London: Chapman and Hall.
  52. Sodano V., Riverso R. and Scafuto F. (2018). Investigating the intention to reduce palm oil consumption. Quality - Access to Success, 19(s1): 500-505.
  53. Spence A., Poortinga W. and Pidgeon N. (2012). The Psychological Distance of Climate Change. Risk Analysis, 32(6): 957-972,
  54. Stoll-Kleemann S. (2001). Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4): 369-385,
  55. Twenge J.M., Campbell W.K. and Freeman E.C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults' life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol., 102(5): 1045-62,
  56. United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report IPCC (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C: an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Press release: Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5ºC. Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  57. Unsworth S., Palicki S. K., and Lustig J. (2016). The impact of mindful meditation in nature on self-nature interconnectedness. Mindfulness, 7: 1052-1060,
  58. Wamsler C., Brossmann J., Hendersson H. et al. (2018). Mindfulness in sustainability science, practice, and teaching. Sustain Sci, 13(1): 143-162,
  59. Wang J., Geng L., Schultz P. W. and Zhou K. (2019). Mindfulness Increases the Belief in Climate Change: The Mediating Role of Connectedness with Nature. Environment and Behavior, 51(1): 3-23,, DOI: 10.1177/0013916517738036
  60. Weber E. U. (2016). What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7: 125-134,
  61. Weber E. U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1): 0013, 1-2,
  62. Whitmarsh L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21: 690-700,

Francesca Scafuto, in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2019, pp. 89-108, DOI:10.3280/RISS2019-002008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche