Click here to download

Professions in the Digital Age: Architects and Engineers Skills Updating in the Provinces of Udine and Pordenone
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Augusto Cocorullo, Gabriele Giacomini 
Year:  2020 Issue: 156 Language: Italian 
Pages:  25 Pg. 170-194 FullText PDF:  284 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2020-156008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The essay analyzes if, how much and how there is an aptitude for professional updating and digital training by engineers and architects of Udine and Pordenone Provinces, as a consequence of the structural changes that these professions have had due to the diffusion of the most modern digital technologies. Particular em-phasis was given to the role of training as a tool to ensure a productive encounter between the subjective professionals’ conditions and the objective territorial con-text situation. About that, the following aspects have been analyzed: strengths and weaknesses of new technologies; factors that influence new technologies’ adop-tion and the skills centrality; policies to improve the territorial context; the future of the profession between the network and specialization; the role of training in the new technologies adoption linked to the lifelong learning.
Keywords: Professions, skills updating, lifelong learning, digital technologies

  1. Abbott A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Adler P., Kwon S.W., Heckscher C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2): 359-376.
  3. Alacevich F., Bellini A., Tonarelli A. (2017). Una professione plurale. Il caso dell’avvocatura fiorentina. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  4. Anderson B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
  5. Barley S.R., Tolbert P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18(1): 93-117., DOI: 10.1177/017084069701800106
  6. Becker H.S., Geer B., Hughes E., Strauss A. (1961). Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bennardo A. (2018). Il ruolo dei team nell’industria 4.0. In: Cipriani A., Gramolati A., Mari G., a cura di, Il lavoro 4.0: La Quarta Rivoluzione industriale e le trasformazioni delle attività lavorative. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  8. Brante T. (2010). Professional fields and truth regimes: In search of alternative approaches. Comparative Sociology, 9(6): 843-886., DOI: 10.1163/156913310X522615
  9. Brewer J.D., Hunter A. (2006). Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  10. Brint S. (2006). Saving the ‘soul of professions’: Freidson’s institutional ethics and the defence of professional autonomy. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(2): 101-129.
  11. Bruns A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
  12. Burrage M., Torstendahl R., a cura di (1990). Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions. London: Sage.
  13. Carrozza M.C. (2018). L’istruzione al tempo della Quarta Rivoluzione Industriale. Sulla necessità di evocare le competenze trasversali ed il pensiero antidisciplinare negli studenti italiani. In: Cipriani A., Gramolati A. e Mari G., a cura di, Il lavoro 4.0: La Quarta Rivoluzione industriale e le trasformazioni delle attività lavorative. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  14. Cech E. (2013). Ideological Wage Gaps? The Technical/Social Dualism and the Gender Wage Gap in Engineering. Social Forces, 91(4): 1147-82.
  15. Cech E. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1): 34-63., DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504305
  16. Corbetta P. (2003). La ricerca sociale: metodologie a tecniche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  17. Costello C.Y. (2005). Professional Identity Crisis: Race, Class, Gender, and Success at Professional Schools. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  18. Creswell J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  19. De Arcangelis G. (2017). Economia internazionale. Milano: McGrAw-Hill.
  20. De Nardis P. (1995). Sociologia delle professioni. In: Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani.
  21. Demazière D., Gadea C. (2009). Sociologie des groupes professionnels: aquis recent et nouveaux défit. Paris: La Découverte.
  22. Donovan K., Gkartzios M. (2014). Architecture and rural planning: ‘Claiming the vernacular’. Land Use Policy, 41: 334-343.
  23. Dovey K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism/architecture/identity/power. London: Routledge.
  24. Dryburgh H. (1999). Work Hard, Play Hard: Women and Professionalization in Engineering – Adapting to the Culture. Gender & Society, 13(5): 664-82., DOI: 10.1177/089124399013005006
  25. Eastman C. (2016). Il BIM: Guida completa al Building Information Modeling per committenti. Milano: Hoepli.
  26. Etzioni A. (1969). The Semi-professionals and their Organization: Teachers, Nurses and Social Workers. New York: Free Press.
  27. Evetts J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism: Occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18(2): 395-415., DOI: 10.1177/0268580903018002005
  28. Evetts J. (2006). Short note: The sociology of professional groups: new directions. Current Sociology, 54(1): 133-143., DOI: 10.1177/0011392106057161
  29. Evetts J. (2008). Introduction: Professional work in Europe: Concepts, theories and methodologies. European Societies, 10(4): 525-544., DOI: 10.1080/14616690701871696
  30. Faulkner W. (2000). Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering. Social Studies of Science, 30(5): 759-92., DOI: 10.1177/030631200030005005
  31. Gallino L. (1978). Sociologia delle Professioni. In: Gallino L., Dizionario di Sociologia. Torino: Utet.
  32. Garber R. (2014). BIM Design: Realising the Creative Potential of Building Information Modelling. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  33. Gauntlett D. (2011). Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to Youtube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity Press (trad. it.: La società dei makers. La creatività dal fai da te al web 2.0. Venezia: Marsilio, 2013).
  34. Giannini M., Minardi E. (1999). I gruppi professionali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  35. Goldthorpe J. (1982). On the service class, its formation and future. In: Giddens A., MacKenzie G., a cura di, Classes and the Division of Labour: Essays in Honour of Ilya Neustadt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 162-185.
  36. Greenwood E. (1957). The attributes of a profession. Social Work, 2: 44-55.
  37. Gresle F. (1989). Profession. In: Boudon R. et al., a cura di, Dictionnaire de Sociologie. Paris: Larousse.
  38. Grusky D.B. (2005). Foundations of Neo-Durkheimian Class Analysis. In: Wright E.O., a cura di, Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51-81.
  39. Jones P.R. (2006). The sociology of architecture and the politics of building: The discursive construction of Ground Zero. Sociology, 40(3): 549-565., DOI: 10.1177/003803850663674
  40. Kensek K., Noble D. (2014). Building Information Modeling: BIM in Current and Future Practice. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
  41. Larson M.S. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  42. Levy F., Murnane R. (2006). The New Division of Labor. How Computers are Creating the New Yob Market. New York: Russel Age Foundation.
  43. McIlwee J.S., Gregg Robinson J. (1992). Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  44. Molina S. (2017). 2030: Quali competenze per imprese a prova di futuro?. Torino: Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli.
  45. National Academy of Engineering (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington: The National Academies Press.
  46. Noordegraaf M. (2007). From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism: Present day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration and Society, 39(6): 761-785., DOI: 10.1177/0095399707304434
  47. Olofsson G. (2009). “The coming of the proto-professions: A third stage of professionalization?”. In: ESA Conference, Lisbon, RN19.
  48. Orzack L.H. (1998). Professions and world trade diplomacy: National systems of international authority. In: Olgiati V., Orzack L., Saks M., a cura di, Professions, Identity and Order in Comparative Perspective, “Onati Papers” 4/5, Onati: The International Institute for the Sociology of Law.
  49. Osservatorio del mercato del lavoro della Provincia di Milano (2012). Gli anni dell'incertezza. Economia e mercato del lavoro in provincia di Milano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  50. Pratt M.G., Rockmann K.W., Kaufmann J.B. (2006). Constructing Professional Identity: The Role of Work and Identity Learning Cycles in the Customization of Identity among Medical Residents. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 235-62., DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786060
  51. Rullani E. (2018). Lavoro in transizione: prove di Quarta Rivoluzione industriale in Italia. In: Cipriani A., Gramolati A., Mari G., a cura di, Il lavoro 4.0: La Quarta Rivoluzione industriale e le trasformazioni delle attività lavorative. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  52. Salas E., Coke N.J., Rosen M.A. (2008). On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3): 540-547., DOI: 10.1518/001872008X288457
  53. Schwab K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
  54. Sciulli D. (2005). Continental sociology of professions today: Conceptual contributions. Current Sociology, 53(6): 915-942., DOI: 10.1177/0011392105057155
  55. Shirky C. (2011). The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1): 28-41.
  56. Svensson L., Evetts J., a cura di (2003). Conceptual and Comparative Studies of Continental and Anglo-American Professions. Göteborg Studies in Sociology, 129, Göteborg: Göteborg University.
  57. Temporelli M., Colorni F., Gamucci B. (2017). 4 punto 0: Fabbriche, professionisti e prodotti della Quarta rivoluzione industriale. Milano: Hoepli.
  58. Trice H.M. (1993). Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace. Ithaca: ILR Press.
  59. Unioncamere (2016). La domanda di professioni e di formazione delle imprese italiane. Progetto Excelsior.
  60. Vale L.J. (1992). Architecture, power, and national identity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  61. Van Dijk J. (2006). The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. London: Sage.
  62. Veltri F. (2018). Verso una nuova divisione del lavoro sociale?. In: Cipriani A., Gramolati A., Mari G., a cura di, Il lavoro 4.0: La Quarta Rivoluzione industriale e le trasformazioni delle attività lavorative. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  63. Weeden K.A., Grusky D.B. (2005). The Case for a New Class Map. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1): 141-212., DOI: 10.1086/428815
  64. Wilensky H. (1964). The professionalization of everyone?. American Journey of Sociology, 70(2): 137-158.

Augusto Cocorullo, Gabriele Giacomini, Professions in the Digital Age: Architects and Engineers Skills Updating in the Provinces of Udine and Pordenone in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 156/2020, pp. 170-194, DOI:10.3280/SL2020-156008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content