Click here to download

Mutual intercultural relations among immigrant and autochthonous youth in Italy. Testing the integration, multiculturalism, and contact hypotheses
Author/s: Cristiano Inguglia, Pasquale Musso, Paolo Albiero, Rosalinda Cassibba, Nicolò Maria Iannello, Maria Grazia Lo Cricchio, Francesca Liga, John W. Berry, Alida Lo Coco 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  35 Pg. 45-79 FullText PDF:  315 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2020-001004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Italy is increasingly becoming a culturally complex society. This poses numerous challenges for developmental and educational psychology, mainly in terms of how to encourage adequate levels of social harmony by promoting positive development of both immigrant and autochthonous youth. Within this perspective, the current paper presents the Italian findings of the Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies (MIRIPS) international project, postulating the centrality of three core hypotheses: integration, multiculturalism, and contact. Two studies were performed to investigate these hypotheses. Study 1 comprised 188 Tunisian adolescents aged 13-18 (51% F; Mage=15.94), while Study 2 included 282 Italian adolescents aged 13-18 (58% F; Mage=16.34). Data collection involved completion of the Italian version of the MIRIPS questionnaires, including security, contact, attitudes, acculturation, and well-being measures. In both studies, hypotheses were simultaneously tested by a SEM approach. The tested theoretical models fit the data well. For Tunisian adolescents, establishing contacts with Italian peers was associated with acculturation outcomes of integration (contact hypothesis), that, in turn, were related to higher well-being (integration hypothesis). Also, higher levels of perceived discrimination were related to acculturation outcomes of separation (multiculturalism hypothesis). For Italian adolescents, feelings of security were linked to higher multicultural ideology and tolerance (multiculturalism hypothesis) as well as to higher contact with immigrants, that, in turn, were connected to lower segregationist attitudes (contact hypothesis). Moreover, higher levels of acculturation expectation of multiculturalism (the idea that nondominant/ immigrant groups should be integrated by both maintaining the original culture and adopting the dominant/hosting culture) were linked to higher self-esteem (integration hypothesis). The findings substantially supported the three core hypotheses and provided insights for decision-makers and practitioners to design effective social policies and educational programs to enhance the quality of intercultural relations among youth in Italy.
Keywords: Integration, multiculturalism, contact, intercultural relations, immigration, acculturation.

  1. Abu-Rayya, H. M., & Sam, D. L. (2017). Is integration the best way to acculturate? A reexamination of the bicultural-adaptation relationship in the ‘ICSEY dataset’ using the bilineal method. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 287-293., DOI: 10.1177/0022022116685846
  2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  3. Annis, R., Gibson, R., & Berry, J. W. (2010, October). Intercultural relations in a rural Canadian prairie city. Paper presented at Mi/Mas Konferencia, Eger, Hungary. -- Retrieved from
  4. Asendorpf, J. B., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2017). A longitudinal study of immigrants’ peer acceptance and rejection: Immigrant status, immigrant composition of the classroom, and acculturation. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23, 486-498.
  5. Barratt, W. (2006). The Barratt Simplified Measure of Social Status (BSMSS). Unpublished manuscript, Indiana State University, Indiana. -- Retrieved from
  6. Benbow, A. E. F., & Rutland, A. (2017). Competence matters! Understanding biculturalism in ethnically diverse adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 366-373.
  7. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-68.
  8. Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. Chun, P. Balls-Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and application (pp. 17-37). Washington, DC: APA Books.
  9. Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697-712.
  10. Berry, J. W. (2006). Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 719-734.
  11. Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2018). Resilience among immigrant youth: The role of culture, development and acculturation. Developmental Review, 50, 99-109.
  12. Berry, J. W. (2013). Intercultural relations in plural societies: Research derived from multiculturalism policy. Acta de Investigacion Psicologica, 3, 1122-1135., DOI: 10.1016/S2007-4719(13)70955-4
  13. Berry, J. W. (2017). Mutual intercultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/9781316875032.010
  14. Berry, J. W., & Kalin, R. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 310-320.
  15. Berry, J. W., & Sabatier, C. (2010). Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 191-207.
  16. Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M., & Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology, 38, 185-206.
  17. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L. & Vedder, P. (2006a). Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L. & Vedder, P. (2006b). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 303-332.
  19. Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767-2796.
  20. Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Maquil, A., Demoulin, S., & Leyens, J.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856.
  21. Blair, I. V., Park, B., & Bachelor, J. (2003). Understanding intergroup anxiety: Are some people more anxious than others? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 151-169., DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006002002
  22. Broad, G. M., Gonzalez, C., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2014). Intergroup relations in South Los Angeles – Combining communication infrastructure and contact hypothesis approaches. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 47-59.
  23. Brown, R. & Zagefka, H. (2011). The dynamics of acculturation: An intergroup perspective. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 129–184). Burlington, VA: Academic Press Caritas Italiana & Fondazione Migrantes. (2019). XXVIII Rapporto immigrazione 2018-2019: Non si tratta solo di migranti. Todi, Italy: TAU.
  24. Carlo, G., Basilio, C. D., & Knight, G. P. (2016). The associations of biculturalism to prosocial tendencies and positive self-evaluations. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 4, 189-201.
  25. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159., DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  26. Dandy, J., & Pe-Pua, R. (2010). Attitudes to multiculturalism, immigration and cultural diversity: Comparison of dominant and non-dominant groups in three Australian states. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 34-46.
  27. Eller, A., & Abrams, D. (2003). “Gringos” in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 55-75., DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006001012
  28. Eller, A., & Abrams, D. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the Common Ingroup Identity Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229-256.
  29. Gieling, M., Thijs, J., & Verkuyten, M. (2014). Dutch adolescents’ tolerance of Muslim immigrants: The role of assimilation ideology, intergroup contact and national identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 155-165.
  30. Giuliani, C., Tagliabue, S., & Regalia, C. (2018). Psychological well-being, multiple identities, and discrimination among first- and second-generation immigrant Muslims. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14, 66.
  31. Hui, B. P. H., Chen, C. X., Leung, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2015). Facilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of bicultural integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 70-84.
  32. Inguglia, C., & Musso, P. (2015). Intercultural profiles and adaptation among immigrant and autochthonous adolescents. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11, 79-99,
  33. Inguglia, C., Musso, P., & Lo Coco, A. (2017). Intercultural Relations in Italy.
  34. In J. W. Berry (Ed.), Mutual Intercultural relations (pp. 187-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/9781316875032.010
  35. Italian Association of Psychology (2015). Codice etico per la ricerca in psicologia. -- Retrieved from
  36. Italian National Institute for Statistics. (2019a). Datawarehouse. -- Retrieved from
  37. Italian National Institute for Statistics. (2019b). La soddisfazione dei cittadini per le condizioni di vita. -- Retrieved from
  38. Kiang, L. & Harter, S. (2008). Do pieces of the self-puzzle fit? An examination of integrated/fragmented selves in Chinese Americans. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1657-1622.
  39. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  40. Kunst, J. R., & Sam, D. L. (2013). Relationship between perceived acculturation expectations and Muslim minority youth’s acculturation and adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 477-490.
  41. 2013.04.007. Lebedeva, N., Tatarko, A., & Berry, J. W. (2016). Intercultural relations among migrants from Caucasus and Russians in Moscow. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 52, 27-38.
  42. Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76-92., DOI: 10.1177/1368430203006001013
  43. Lorenzo-Blanco, E. I., Unger, J. B., Ritt-Olson, A., Soto, D., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2011). Acculturation, gender, depression, and cigarette smoking among U.S. hispanic youth: The mediating role of perceived discrimination. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1519-1533.
  44. Mak, A. S., Brown, P. M., & Wadey, D. (2014). Contact and Attitudes Toward International Students in Australia: Intergroup Anxiety and Intercultural Communication Emotions as Mediators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 491–504., DOI: 10.1177/0022022113509883
  45. Miconi, D., Altoe, G., Salcuni, S., Di Riso, D., Schiff, S., & Moscardino, U. (2018). Discrimination and externalizing problems among Moroccan- and Romanian-origin early adolescents in Italy: Moderating role of cultural orientations and impulse control. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24, 374-388.
  46. MIRIPS. Mutual intercultural relations in plural societies [Research presentation]. (n.d.). -- Available from
  47. Motti-Stefanidi, F., Berry, J.W., Chryssochoou, X., Sam, D.L.& Phinney, J. (2012). Positive immigrant youth adaptation in context: Developmental, acculturation, and social psychological perspectives. In A. Masten, K.
  48. Liebkind & D. Hernandez (Eds). Capitalizing on migration: The Potential of immigrant youth (pp.117-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  49. Motti-Stefanidi, F., & Masten, A. S. (2017). A resilience perspective on immigrant youth adaptation and development. In N. J. Cabrera & B. Leyendecker (Eds.), Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 19-34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43645-6_2
  50. Musso, P., Inguglia, C., & Lo Coco, A. (2015). Acculturation profiles and perceived discrimination: Associations with psychosocial well-being among Tunisian adolescents in Italy. Social Inquiry into Wellbeing, 1, 76-90., DOI: 10.13165/SIIW-15-1-1-06
  51. Musso, P., Inguglia, C., & Lo Coco, A. (2017). Relationships between ethnic identity, ethnic attitudes, and acculturative stress in Tunisian individuals in early and middle adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 1309-1340.
  52. Neto, F. (2019). Acculturation, adaptation and saudade among Portuguese migrants. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 153, 1-13., DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2019.1590298
  53. Neto, F., Barros, J., & Schmitz, P. G. (2005). Acculturation attitudes and adaptation among Portuguese immigrants in Germany: Integration or separation. Psychology and Developing Societies, 17, 19-32., DOI: 10.1177/097133360501700102
  54. Nguyen, A.-M. T., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 122-159., DOI: 10.1177/0022022111435097
  55. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: Mc-Graw-Hill.
  56. Oppedal, B. (2006). Development and acculturation. In D. L. Sam & J. W.
  57. Berry (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 97-112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  58. Pavlopoulos, V., & Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2017). Intercultural relations in Greece. In J. W. Berry (Ed.), Mutual intercultural relations (pp. 167-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/9781316875032.009
  59. Pettigrew, T. F (1998). Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
  60. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does contact reduce prejudice? A meta-analytic test of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934.
  61. Pfafferott, I., & Brown, R. (2006). Acculturation preferences of majority and minority adolescents in Germany in the context of society and family. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 703-717.
  62. Phinney, J. S., Berry, J. W., Vedder, P., & Liebkind, K. (2006). The acculturation experience: Attitudes, identities and behaviors of immigrant youth. In J. W. Berry, J. S. Phinney, D. L. Sam, & P. Vedder (Eds.), Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts (pp. 71-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  63. Piontkowski, U., Rohmann, A., & Florack, A. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 221-232., DOI: 10.1177/1368430202005003003
  64. Prezza, M., Trombaccia, F. R., & Armento, L. (1997). La scala dell’autostima di Rosenberg: Traduzione e validazione italiana. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 223, 35-44.
  65. Robinson, L. (2009). South Asians in Britain: Acculturation, cultural identity and perceived discrimination. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 9, 71-84. -- Retrieved from
  66. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  67. Rudmin, F. W. (2003). Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of General Psychology, 7, 3-37., DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.3
  68. Rudmin, F. W., & Ahmadzadeh, V. (2001). Psychometric critique of acculturation psychology: The case of Iranian migrants in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 41-56., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9450.00213
  69. Salvati, M., Carone, N., De Cristofaro, V., Giacomantonio, M., & Baiocco, R. (2019). Support for discriminatory behaviours against immigrants in Italy: Perceived threat and positive beliefs mediate the effect of contact with immigrants. International Journal of Psychology. Advanced online publication.
  70. Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316219218
  71. Scardigno, R., Pastore, S., & Mininni, G. (2019). La famiglia mista come crogiolo discorsivo di culture. Psicologia sociale, 14, 73-98.
  72. , DOI: 10.1482/9292
  73. Schachner, M. K., Noack, P., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Eckstein, K. (2016). Cultural diversity climate and psychological adjustment at school – Equality and inclusion versus cultural pluralism. Child Development, 87,1175-1191.
  74. Schmitz, P. G., & Schmitz, F. (2012). Emotional intelligence and acculturation. Behavioral Psychology, 20(1), 15-41.
  75. Schotte, K., Stanat, P., & Edele, A. (2018). Is integration always most adaptive? The role of cultural identity in academic achievement and in psychological adaptation of immigrant students in Germany. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 16-37.
  76. Schwartz, S. J., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2008). Testing Berry’s model of acculturation: A confirmatory latent class approach. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 275-285.
  77. Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., Cordova, D., Mason, C. A., Huang, S., & Villamar, J. A. (2015). Developmental trajectories of acculturation: Links with family functioning and mental health in recent-immigrant Hispanic adolescents. Child Development, 86, 726-748.
  78. Sklad M., Park E. (2017). Examining the potential role of education in the prevention of radicalization from the psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 432-437.
  79. Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221-1238.
  80. Titzmann, P. F., & Jugert, P. (2017). Transition to a new country: Acculturative and developmental predictors for changes in self-efficacy among adolescent immigrants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2143-2156.
  81. Titzmann, P. F., & Lee, R. M. (2018). Adaptation of young immigrants: A developmental perspective on acculturation. European Psychologist, 23, 72-82.
  82. Titzmann, P. F., Brenick, A., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2015). Friendships fighting prejudice: A longitudinal perspective on adolescents’ cross-group friendships with immigrants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1318-1331.
  83. Umana-Taylor, A. J., Quintana, S. M., Lee, R. M., Cross, Jr., W. E., Rivas-Drake, D., Schwartz, S. J.,Syed, M., Seaton, E. (2014). Ethnic and racial identity during adolescence and into young adulthood: An integrated conceptualization. Child Development, 85, 21-39.
  84. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Breugelmans, S. M., & Schalk-Soekar, S. R. G. (2008). Multiculturalism: Construct validity and stability. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 93-104.
  85. Vedder, P., Wenink, E., & van Geel, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and prejudice between Dutch majority and Muslim minority youth in the Netherlands. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23, 477-485.
  86. Verkuyten, M. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  87. Verkuyten, M. (2009). Self-esteem and multiculturalism: An examination among ethnic minority and majority groups in the Netherlands. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 419-427.
  88. Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Trifiletti, E., & Di Bernardo, G. A. (2017). Improving intergroup relations with extended contact among young children: Mediation by intergroup empathy and moderation by direct intergroup contact. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 35-49.
  89. Ward, C. (2013). Probing identity, integration and adaptation: Big questions, little answers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 391-404.
  90. Ward, C., & Masgoret, A. M. (2008). Attitudes toward immigrants, immigration, and multiculturalism in New Zealand: A social psychological analysis. International Migration Review, 42, 227-248.
  91. Ward, C., Gale, J., Staerkle, C., & Stuart, J. (2018). Immigration and multiculturalism in context: A framework for psychological research. Journal of Social Issues, 74, 833-855.
  92. Ward, C., Stuart, J., & Kus, L. (2011). The construction and validation of a measure of ethno-cultural identity conflict. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 462-473., DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2011.558872
  93. Yucel, D., & Psaltis, C. (2019). Intergroup contact and willingness for renewed cohabitation in Cyprus: Exploring the mediating and moderating mechanisms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations., DOI: 10.1177/1368430219845053

Cristiano Inguglia, Pasquale Musso, Paolo Albiero, Rosalinda Cassibba, Nicolò Maria Iannello, Maria Grazia Lo Cricchio, Francesca Liga, John W. Berry, Alida Lo Coco, in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2020, pp. 45-79, DOI:10.3280/RIP2020-001004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content