Click here to download

Exit paths from partner violence: role of children, women's agency and ob-stacles in society
Author/s: Federica Bastiani, Mariachiara Feresin, Patrizia Romito 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  20 Pg. 65-84 FullText PDF:  206 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SISS2019-003006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Few studies have investigated the personal and social factors that predict the end of the partner violence and which factors could support women on their path to liberation. The aim of this research is to examine under what conditions women manage to get out of partner violence and what obstacles they find in this path. The study is multi-method and the data collected are related to women who turned to 5 anti-violence centers in Northern Italy. The quantitative results revealed that the presence of children is a key element in the path of women: when they shared children with the abuser, they were more likely to continue to suffer violence even after separation: 18 months after the first contact, violence had significantly decreased or ceased for 98% of childless wom-en, 84% of those with one child and only 55% of those with two or more children. The qualitative results showed that the women interviewed had been active in re-acting to violence, separating from the partner and going to an anti-violence cen-ter. However, social and legal services often hinder this path in the name of the principle of bi-parenthood and the belief that a father figure, even if violent, is necessary. In particular, it emerged that: they oblige women and children to meet violent ex-partners / fathers even at the cost of endangering them; they always fa-vor the father/child relationship; they adhere to pseudo-theories such as Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) or Parental Alienation (PA). Paradoxically, it seems that when a woman victim of violence manifests agency, it causes the irritation of operators and operatives and clashes with a lack of willingness to help her effec-tively.
Keywords: Partner violence; agency; children; obstacles.

  1. Babbie E. (2010). Ricerca sociale. Rimini: Maggioli Editore.
  2. Bastiani F. (2018) The predictors of escaping violence: a two years’ follow-up of women who sought help at an anti-violence centre, Tesi di dottorato, Università di Trieste.
  3. Bastiani F., Saurel-Cubizolles, M.-J. & Romito P. (2018) The help-seeking process among women victims of partner violence in Italy, Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 2(1), 75–92.
  4. Bell M.E., Goodman L.A., & Dutton M.A. (2007). The dynamics of staying and leaving: Implications for battered women’s Emotional well-being and experiences of violence at the end of a year. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6): 413–428. --
  5. Brosi M.W., & Rolling E.S. (2010). A narrative journey for intimate partner violence: From victim to survivor. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 38, 237–250., DOI: 10.1080/01926180902961761
  6. Cardi C. (2010). La construction sexuée des risques familiaux. Politiques sociales et familiales, 101: 35-45.
  7. Casas Vila G. (2017). Mediazione familiare e violenza domestica: prospettive internazionali. In: Romito P., Folla N., Melato M. (Eds.), La violenza sulle donne e i minori. Una guida per chi lavora sul campo. Roma: Carocci.
  8. Casas Vila G. (2020). Parental alienation syndrome in Spain: opposed by the government but accepted in the courts. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42, 1.
  9. CISMAI. (2017). Requisiti minimi degli interventi nei casi di violenza assistita. Disponibile in:
  10. Cole A. (2007). The Cult of True Victimhood. Stanford: University Press.
  11. Council of Europe. (2011). Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. -- Disponibile in:
  12. Creazzo G. (2013). (a cura di) Se le donne chiedono giustizia. Le risposte del sistema penale alle donne che subiscono violenza nelle relazioni di intimità: ricerca e prospettive internazionali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Crisma M., Romito P. (2007). L’occultamento delle violenze sui minori: il caso della sindrome da alienazione parentale. Rivista di sessuologia, 31: 263-270.
  14. Dragiewicz M., Barkwell C. (2016). Luke ’ s Place : An Innovative Program for Assisting Abused Mothers Postseparation. In: Hannah M.T. & Goldstein B. (Eds.), Domestic Violence, Abuse and Child Custody: Legal Strategies and Policy Issues: 1–18. N.J.: Civic Research Institute, Kingston.
  15. Dragiewicz, Molly. (2008). Patriarchy Reasserted. Feminist Criminology, 3(2), 121-144. --
  16. Eures, Ansa. (2012). Il femminicidio in Italia nell’ultimo decennio. Dimensioni, caratteristiche e profili di rischio. Indagine istituzionale. -- Disponibile in:
  17. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. Publications Office of the European Union. --
  18. Feresin M. (2019). Affido dei figli e delle figlie in contesti di violenza del partner: esperienze delle donne e logiche dei servizi. Tesi di dottorato. Università di Trieste.
  19. Feresin M. (2020). Parental alienation (syndrome) in child custody cases: survivors’ experiences and the logic of psycho-social and legal services in Italy. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42, 1.
  20. Ferguson H. (2017). How children become invisible in child protection work: Findings from research into day-to-day social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1007–1023. --
  21. Garcia-Moreno C., Jansen H., Ellsberg M., Heise L., & Watts C. (2005). WHO Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. World Health Organization.
  22. Hester M. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and childrens safety in contexts of domestic violence, British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 837-853. --
  23. Jeffries S. (2016). In the Best Interests of the Abuser: Coercive Control, Child Custody Proceedings and the “Expert” Assessments That Guide Judicial Determinations, Laws, 5(1), 14.
  24. Kabeer N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30: 435-464., DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00125
  25. Kauffman J. C. (2009). L’intervista. Bologna: il Mulino.
  26. Kelly L., Sharp N., Klein R. (2014). Finding the Costs of Freedom. How women and children rebuilt their lives after domestic violence. Solace Women’s Aid.
  27. Laing L. (2016). Secondary victimization: Domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence Against Women, 1-22.
  28. Lapierre S. (2010). More responsibilities, less control: Understanding the challenges and difficulties involved in mothering in the context of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 40(5), 1434–1451. --
  29. Lapierre S. et al. (2020). The legitimization and institutionalization of ‘parental alienation’ in the Province of Quebec. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42, 1.
  30. Mahoney M.R. (1994). Victimization or oppression? Women’s lives, violence, and agency. In: Fineman M.A. & Mykitiuk R. (Eds.), The public nature ofprivate violence: The discovery ofdomestic abuse. New York, NY: Routledge.
  31. Mardorossian C.M. (2002). Toward a new feminist theory ofrape. Signs, 27, 743-775., DOI: 10.1086/337938
  32. Meier J.S., Dickson S. (2017). Mapping Gender: Shedding Empirical Light on Family Courts’ Treatment of Cases Involving Abuse and Alienation, Law & Inequality, 35, 311-328.
  33. Montero I., Martin-Baena D., Escribà-Aguir V., Vives-Cases C., & Ruiz-Pérez I. (2015). Factors Associated with the Cessation of Intimate Partner Violence in Women Attending Primary Care in Spain. Journal of Family Violence, 30(4), 453-460. --
  34. Pomicino L., Beltramini L., Romito P. (2018). Freeing oneself from intimate partner violence: a follow up of women who contacted an anti-violence centre in Italy. Violence Against Women, 25(8): 925-944.
  35. Romito P. (2005 e 2018). Un silenzio assordante: la violenza occultata su donne e minori. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  36. Romito P. (2010). Creare la confusione per far sparire i fatti: l’occultamento delle violenze maschiliste contro le donne. Blog Donne della realtà, 6/6/2010.
  37. Salazar C.F., & Casto C. (2008). Moving from victim to survivor of cultural violence: A conceptual model. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 47(1), 82–98.
  38. Silberg J., Dallam S., Samson E. (2013). Crisis in Family Court: Lessons From Turned Around Cases, Final Report submitted to the Office of Violence Against Women, Department of Justice.
  39. Sokoloff N.J., & Dupont I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections ofrace, class, and gender challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence against Women, 11(1), 38–64., DOI: 10.1177/1077801204271476
  40. Turan J.M., Hatcher A.M., Romito P., Mangone E., Durojaiye M., Odero M., et al. (2016). Intimate partner violence and forced migration during pregnancy: Structural constraints to women’s agency. Global Public Health, 11, 153-168.
  41. WHO. (2002). World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. -- Disponibile in:
  42. WHO. (2013). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Versione italiana: De Girolamo, G. & Romito, P. (a cura di) (2014) Come rispondere alla violenza del partner e alla violenza sessuale contro le donne. Orientamenti e linee-guida cliniche dell’Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità (Fioriti Editore).
  43. Zeilinger I. (2008). Non c’est non. Paris: La Découverte.

Federica Bastiani, Mariachiara Feresin, Patrizia Romito, Exit paths from partner violence: role of children, women's agency and ob-stacles in society in "SICUREZZA E SCIENZE SOCIALI" 3/2019, pp. 65-84, DOI:10.3280/SISS2019-003006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content