22 mesi v.m. 2017: 0,82; 2018: 0,86; 2019: 0,89) rispetto al Medico Singolo (2018: 0,56; 2019: 0,57).)" />
Click here to download

La "cartella informatizzata" del Medico di Medicina Generale nel sistema di valutazione delle performance dell’Assistenza Primaria
Journal Title: MECOSAN 
Author/s: Maria Cristina Ghiotto, Ylenia Rizzolo, Elisa Carraro, Mirko Claus 
Year:  2019 Issue: 112 Language: Italian 
Pages:  19 Pg. 41-59 FullText PDF:  873 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MESA2019-112003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Background. Good quality data registered by the GPs in the patient EHR (Electronic Health Record) is critical to ensure the continuity of care and to improve health outcomes, but data completeness and accuracy in the primary care have been shown being sub-optimal. The Veneto Region has defined and implemented an additional information flow to collect anonymized aggregate data from GPs’ EHR to measure data registration quality in specific strategic areas: health promotion, disease prevention, chronic care and disease management programs. Objective. Our study describes the definition and the first results of the information flow designed to measure data accuracy and data quality of the GPs EHR in the Veneto Region. Methods. Developed in 2016 through a shared process involving GPs representatives, IVAQ has been structured in the EHR in particular to support Integrated Medical Group contract monitoring. Each month aggregate data are collected and used to calculate for each GPs single measures (prevalence, indicators), and a composite index, the IVAQ index (score 0-1). Results. Since 2017, 2905 on 3249 GPs have sent their data at least once through IVAQ. The IVAQ index scores differently according to the organizational model adopted by GPs (MGI > 22 months mean value 2017: 0,82; 2018: 0,86; 2019: 0,89 vs. Single Physician mean value: 2018: 0,56; 2019: 0,57).
Keywords: Data quality, primary care, integrated medical group, electronic health record, organizational models.

  1. Allen P. (2000). Clinical governance in primary care. Accountability for clinical governance: Developing collective responsibility for quality in primary care. British Medical Journal, 321(7261): 608-611.
  2. Bailie R., Bailie J., Chakraborty A. & Swift K. (2015). Consistency of denominator data in electronic health records in Australian primary healthcare services: Enhancing data quality. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 21(4): 450-459., DOI: 10.1071/PY14071
  3. Barkhuysen P., De Grauw W., Akkermans R., Donkers J., Schers H. & Biermans M. (2014). Is the quality of data in an electronic medical record sufficient for assessing the quality of primary care?. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(4): 692-698.
  4. Blumenthal D. & Tavenner M. (2010, August 5). The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine. Massachussetts Medical Society.
  5. Calman N., Hauser D., Lurio J., Wu W.Y. & Pichardo M. (2012). Strengthening public health and primary care collaboration through electronic health records. American Journal of Public Health, 102(11)., DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301000
  6. Cepiku D., Hinna A., Scarozza D. & Savignon A.B. (2017). Performance information use in public administration: an exploratory study of determinants and effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 21(4): 963-991.
  7. DPCM n. 178 del 29 settembre 2015 “Regolamento in materia di fascicolo sanitario elettronico”.
  8. Dyhrberg-Noerregaard N. (2015). Calling Attention to the Nature of Professional Knowledge and Its Impact on Perceptions of Performance Measures. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(6): 397-409., DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2014.938821
  9. Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in Health (EXPH) (2017). Opinion on Tools and Methodologies for Assessing the Performance of Primary Care. -- Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/expert_panel/sites/expertpanel/files/docsdir/opinion_primarycare_performance_en.pdf.
  10. Fabiani L., Scatigna M., Panopoulou K., Sabatini A., Sessa E., Donato F. & Marchi M. (2004). [Health Search--Research Institute of the Italian Society of General Practice: the creation of a research database in general practice]. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 28(3): 156-162. -- Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15532872.
  11. Fazekas M., Ettelt S., Newbould J. & Nolte E. (2010). Framework for assessing, improving and enhancing health service planning. RAND Europe.
  12. Figueras J. (1993). Effective health care planning – the role of financial allocation mechanisms [thesis]. University of London.
  13. Friedman D.J., Parrish R.G. & Ross D.A. (2013). Electronic health records and US public health: current realities and future promise. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9): 1560-1567., DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301220
  14. Ghiotto M.C., Rizzolo Y., Gandolfo E., Zuliani E. & Mantoan D. (2018). Strengthening primary care: The Veneto Region’s model of the Integrated Medical Group. Health Policy, 122(11): 1149-1154.
  15. Giunta Regionale del Veneto. Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale n. 751 del 14 maggio 2015. Attuazione della Legge regionale 29 giugno 2012, n. 23 “Norme in materia di programmazione socio-sanitaria e approvazione del Piano Socio-Sanitario Regionale 2012-2016” e smi. Sviluppo delle Cure Primarie attraverso la diffusione del modello di Medicina di Gruppo Integrata, in attuazione della DGR n. 953/2013. Definizione del contratto di esercizio tipo per le Medicine di Gruppo Integrate. DGR n. 127/CR del 3 ottobre 2013. (2015).
  16. Julnes P. de L. & Holzer M. (2001). Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6): 693-708., DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00140
  17. Kerpershoek E., Groenleer M. & de Bruijn H. (2016). Unintended responses to performance management in dutch hospital care: Bringing together the managerial and professional perspectives. Public Management Review, 18(3): 417-436.
  18. Ministero della Salute (2010). Il Fascicolo Sanitario Elettronico. Linee guida nazionali. Ministero della Salute, Dipartimento della Programmazione e dell’Ordinamento del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale, Direzione Generale della Programmazione Sanitaria (2012). Manuale di formazione per il governo clinico: monitoraggio delle performance cliniche. Ministero della Salute, Dipartimento della qualita, Direzione Generale della Programmazione Sanitaria, dei livelli essenziali di assistenza e dei principi etici di sistema (2011). L’audit clinico.
  19. Moynihan D.P. & Pandey S.K. (2010). The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4): 849-866.
  20. Neves A.L., Poovendran D., Freise L., Ghafur S., Flott K., Darzi A. & Mayer E.K. (2019). Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on the secondary use of health records to improve quality and safety of care: a qualitative study in England (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research., DOI: 10.2196/14135
  21. Oppi C., Campanale C., Cinquini L. & Vagnoni E. (2019). Clinicians and accounting: A systematic review and research directions. Financial Accountability and Management, 35(3): 290-312.
  22. Regione del Veneto. Legge regionale n. 23 del 29 giugno 2012. Norme in materia di programmazione socio sanitaria e approvazione del Piano socio-sanitario regionale 2012-2016.
  23. Reid R., Haggerty J. & Ma R.M. (2002). Defusing the Confusion: Concepts and Measures of Continuity of Healthcare. Final Report. -- Retrieved from www.chsrf.ca.
  24. Russo S. (2012). Economia e management delle aziende sanitarie pubbliche. Profili Evolutivi, Assetto Istituzionale e Performance. Padova: Cedam.
  25. World Health Organization (2018a). Continuity and coordination of care: a practice brief to support implementation of the WHO Framework on integrated people-centred health services.
  26. World Health Organization (2018b). Digital technologies: shaping the future of primary health care (Technical series on primary health care).
  27. World Health Organization (2018c). Quality in primary health care (Technical series on primary health care).

Maria Cristina Ghiotto, Ylenia Rizzolo, Elisa Carraro, Mirko Claus, in "MECOSAN" 112/2019, pp. 41-59, DOI:10.3280/MESA2019-112003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content