Clicca qui per scaricare

The role of the individual in the protection of their rights and interests in international courts
Titolo Rivista: RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA' 
Autori/Curatori: Lyazzat B. Nyssanbekova, Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer, Zhuldyz T. Sairambaeva, Shaimardan M. Sharipov, Ilyas K. Kuderin 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  20 P. 403-422 Dimensione file:  110 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RISS2020-001024
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The article deals with the theoretical issue of the legal personality of an individual. The main focus was on whether an individual is a subject of international law or not. The authors analyzed the provisions of normative legal acts of the interna-tional and national level of legal regulation of the citizen’s right to appeal to state authorities and local self-government. The authors analyze the conservative view that only collective actors, such as states or state organizations (like the United Na-tions), can be subject to the rights and obligations of international law. This is what the article refers to as "a subject of international law", the holder of rights and ob-ligations in international law. The authors also argue that all laws exist in order to regulate the behavior of people; that states and state organizations can act only through individuals. According to the authors, many of the norms of international law are designed to regulate the behavior of people, regardless of whether they act as individuals or agents of the state (Karmaza et al., 2018). The authors agree that a lot of international law is designed to require or prohibit certain behavior. The article shows that regardless of whether the principles and norms of international law directly affect individuals or only indirectly by incorporating these norms - in-ternational law into national law, this is an important point in the theory of inter-national law.


Keywords: International law, regulation, litigation, court, defense of rights.

  1. Andreev A.V. (2016). Actual problems of reparation to detained persons subsequently recognized as innocent by international criminal courts and tribunals. International Criminal Law and International Justice, 6: 27-30.
  2. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2007). -- Available from: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901888686.
  3. Cherabaeva V.N. (2016). Decisions of international courts as a precedent. Dagestan State University of National Economy, Makhachkala.
  4. Convention on laws and customs of land war, October 18, 1907 18-10-1907 Treaty with the appendix: Provision on the laws and customs of land war. (1907). -- Available from: https://www.icrc.org/rus/resources/documents/misc/hague-convention-iv-181007.htm.
  5. Dmitrenko A.A. (2017). International justice and protection of human rights (on the example of the European Court of Human Rights). Science and Education: Economy and Economics; Entrepreneurship; Law and Administration, 1(80): 110-112.
  6. Dzhantaev H.M. (2016). International courts of mixed membership (features of formation, activity, efficiency. Modern Humanities Studies, 5(72): 100-103.
  7. Epifanova E.V. (2016). The practice of international courts in the field of human rights and the formation of a uniform understanding of crime. Essays of the Latest Camelistics, 2: 33-46.
  8. Ermolovich G.P. (2016). International courts: the long journey of creation. ANO VPO Institute of Jurisprudence and Management VPA, Tula.
  9. Gulasaryan A.S. (2016). The proliferation of international courts and international law. Future of international law. Nauka, Moscow.
  10. Ispolinov A.S. (2017). Execution of decisions of international courts: theory and practice. International Justice, 1(21): 45-67.
  11. Karmaza O.O., Sarana S.V., Fedorenko T.V., Gurzhii T.O., Nefedova A.V. (2018). The protection of civil rights and interests in the court. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(8): 2622-2630.
  12. Lits M.O., Prokopyeva N.V. (2006). Some problems of the international legal personality of unrecognized states and their citizens. Tyumen State University Publishing House, Tyumen.
  13. Mishchikhina E.S. (2017). Approaches to the study of the personality of the person in international legal relations. Nauka i Prosveshcheniye, Penza.
  14. Muradov A.A. (2016). On the issue of international standards of courts in protecting the rights of people to life and health. Education and Law, 10: 167-172.
  15. Nowak M. (2005). Commentary on the U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. N.P. Engel Verlag, Kehl.
  16. Pechegin D.A. (2016). The combination of adversarial and investigative began in the proceedings of the international criminal court. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow.
  17. Podshibyakin A.S. (2016). International Criminal Court and the problems of national legislation. Moscow State University, Moscow.
  18. Romanov R.V. (2016). Reasonable doubts: standard of proof in international criminal courts. International Law, 4: 39-46.
  19. Romanovsky G.B., Romanovskaya O.V. (2013). Constitutional legal personality of citizens and modern biotechnology. Law Issues, 2(18): 309-333.
  20. Romashov R.A., Nizhnik N.S. (2007). Legal status and legal personality of a person: theory, history, comparativistics. St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, St. Petersburg.
  21. Ryzhova A.A. (2016). The right to recognition of legal personality. Human Rights Activist, 2: 25-28.
  22. Shcherbakov A.A. (2016). Decisions of the international court of the United Nations as a source of law. SAFU, Arkhangelsk.
  23. Stamboltsyan S.A. (2016). The value of decisions of international courts in the modern law and order. New Science: Problems and Prospects, 3-1(67): 247-249.
  24. Statute of the International Court of Justice (1920). -- Available from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute.
  25. Tokatov R.A., Myrzaliyeva Zh.T., Zhagalov R.B. (2016). Arbitration Court at the International Financial Center “Astana”. International Journal of Experimental Education, 7: 119-122.
  26. Tumanov V.A., Entin L.M. (2002). Commentary on the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its application. Norma, Moscow.
  27. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of December 10, 1948. -- Available from: http://www.un.org/ru/ documents/decl_conv/declarations/declhr.shtml.
  28. Velikaya E.V. (2017). Consideration of a criminal case in the absence of the accused: international standards and practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Russian justice, 2(130): 103-110.
  29. Vylegzhanin A.N., Alfereva K.E. (2016). Contribution of the International Court of Justice to the development of international economic law. Moscow Journal of International Law, 3(103): 31-48.



  1. Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found.

Lyazzat B. Nyssanbekova, Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer, Zhuldyz T. Sairambaeva, Shaimardan M. Sharipov, Ilyas K. Kuderin, in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2020, pp. 403-422, DOI:10.3280/RISS2020-001024

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche