Clicca qui per scaricare

How upright a public bus transport system is desirable for sustainable mobility?
Titolo Rivista: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Autori/Curatori: Pragati Jain, Prerna Jain, Roopesh Kaushik 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: 1  Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 47-61 Dimensione file:  199 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2020-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Sustainable mobility demands the inclusion of environment, social and economic sustainabil-ity. Public transport especially the bus system can be explored to fulfill these three sub goals. Globally the uses of personal vehicles have noticed an exponential growth owing to high per capita income and not up to the mark standards of public transport system. The emphasis on the requirement to probe significant questions while designing urban transport policies moti-vates this study to investigate what an ideal public bus system should be like, in the eyes of, those who either do not use or have shifted from public to private mode of travel. A survey on 1554 respondents is conducted to identify the various attributes that the public desire for, of a public bus system. These 12 items or attributes are clubbed into four categories using factor analysis. The logit regression run on the binary outcome "Shift" variable of opting or not opt-ing for public bus system with the four predicator variables (institutional, personnel, personal and qualitative) obtained using factor analysis shows positive association of improvement in these predicators to the outcome of opting for public transport.


Keywords: Sustainable mobility, public bus transport, environment sustainability, social sus-tainability, economic sustainability, rebound effect.
Jel Code: O1, Q4, Q5, R4

  1. AASHTO (2009). Transportation and Sustainability Best Practices Background Transportation and Sustainability Peer Exchange, May 27-29, Gallaudet University Kellogg Center.
  2. Alcott B. (2005). Jevons’ paradox, Ecological Economics, 54(1), 1 July: 9-21.
  3. Assadourian E. (2016). Degrowth and the relationship between consumerism and sustainability. The Beam No. 3. -- https://medium.com/thebeammagazine/eric‐assadourian‐f049886e19f9.on 6.1.2020.
  4. Ayres R., Warr B. (2009). Energy efficiency and economic growth: the ‘Rebound Effect’ as driver. In: Herring H., Sorrell S. (Eds.). Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 119-135., DOI: 10.1057/9780230583108.
  5. BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2019). -- http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview. Retrieved on 7.1.2020.
  6. Brockway P.E., Saunders H., Heun M.K., Foxon T.J., Steinberger J.K., Barrett J.R. et al. (2017). Energy Rebound as a Potential Threat to a Low-Carbon Future: findings from a new exergy-based national-level rebound approach. Energies, 10: 51
  7. Cervero R. (2013). Transport Infrastructure and the Environment: Sustainable Mobility and Urbanism. Paper prepared for the 2nd Planocosmo, International Conference Bandung Institute of Technology, October.
  8. Chakravarty D., Shyamasree D., Joyashree R. (2013). Rebound effect: how much to worry? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(2), June: 216-228.
  9. Clark M. (2014) Transport Infrastructure in Developing Countries: The Sleeping Giant. -- https://sites.utexas.edu/mecc/2014/04/26/transport-infrastructure-in-developing-countries-the-sleeping-giant/ Retrieved on 4.1.2020.
  10. CMP (2010). Comprehensive Mobility Plan, Wilbur Smith Associates, Jaipur.
  11. Creutzig F., Jochem P., Edelenbosch O.Y., Mattauch L., van Vuuren D.P., McCollum D. et al. (2015). Transport: a roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science, 350: 911-912.
  12. DelDOT (2006). Report on Customer satisfaction Survey. Delaware Department of Transportation.
  13. Depuy G. (1999). From the “magic circle” to “automobile dependence”: measurements and political implications. Transport Policy, 6: 1-17.
  14. Freeman R. (2018). A Theory on the Future of the Rebound Effect in a Resource-Constrained World, Front. Energy Res., 17 August 2018
  15. Frondel M., Peters J., Vance C. (2009). Fuel Efficiency and Automobile Travel in Germany: Don’t Forget the Rebound Effect! In: Herring H., Sorrell S. (Eds.). Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Gakenheimer R., Dimitriou H. (2011). Introduction. In: Dimitriou H., Gakenheimer R. (Eds.). Urban Transport in the Developing World: A Handbook of Policy and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  17. Geyer A.E., Zacarias F.A. (2002). Towards sustainable household consumption: Trends and policies in OECD countries. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development.
  18. Gillingham K., David R., Gernot W. (2014). The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy, Discussion papers 14-39. Resources for the Future.
  19. Goodwin P., Dargay J., Hanly M. (2004). Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: a review. Transport Reviews, 24(3): 275-92.
  20. Gwilliam K. (1997). Sustainable Transport and Economic Development. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 31(3).
  21. IEA (International Energy Outlook) (2016). U.S. Energy Information Administration. -- https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/transportation.pdf. Accessed on 2.1.2020.
  22. IEA (2010). Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels. Paris: IEA Information Paper.
  23. Jain P., Jain P. (2019). Ensuring sustainable development by curbing consumerism: An eco‐spiritual perspective. Sustainable Development, 27: 474-480.
  24. Jean-Paul R. (2020). Transport, Energy and Environment in The Geography of Transport Systems. 5th Ed. New York: Routledge.
  25. Johnston M. (2019). Is Infinite Economic Growth on a Finite Planet Possible? -- https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/120515/infinite-economic-growth-finite-planet-possible. asp accessed on 7.1.2020.
  26. Jonsson D.K., Johansson J. (2006). Indirect effects to include in strategic Environmental assessments of transport infrastructure investments. Transport Review, 26(2): 151-166.
  27. Kaiser H.F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39: 31-36.
  28. Kaiser H.F., Rice J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34: 111-117.
  29. Kaustuva B. (2016). Road Rationing and Economic Gains Assessing Delhi’s Odd-Even Formula. Economic & Political Weekly, I(2), 09 January.
  30. Klunker C.K. (2018). The right cost-benefit analysis for e-vehicles. Live Mint, 05 March.
  31. Lovins A.B. (1988). Energy saving resulting from the adoption of more efficient appliances: another view. Energy Journal, 9(2): 155-62.
  32. Newman P.W.G., Kenworthy J.R. (1999). Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Washington DC: Island Press.
  33. Orecchia C., Zoppoli P. (2007). Consumerism and environment: Does consumption behavior affect environmental quality? Tor Vergata University, CEIS, Departmental Working Papers. No. 261.
  34. Pourbaix J. (2011). Towards a smart future for cities: urban transport scenarios for 2025. Public Transport International, 60(3).
  35. Saunders H.D. (1992). The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth. The Energy Journal, 13(4): 131-148.
  36. Scheurer J., Peter N., Jeff K. (Date Unknown). Why Light Rail, Not Buses? The Knowledge Arc Light Rail. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute.
  37. Schreurs J. (2010). Living with less: Prospects for sustainability. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Schrijen-Lippertz.
  38. Sharma S. (2019). The fight against air pollution should not be Just Delhi-Centric. The Live Mint Saturday, 16 November, New Delhi.
  39. Small K.A., Erik T.V. (2007). Economics of Urban Transportation. New York: Routledge.
  40. Sustainable Mobility for All (2019). Global Roadmap of Action Toward Sustainable Mobility. Washington DC.
  41. TSW (2014). Transport for NSW. Customer Satisfaction Index 2014. UK: Edward Elgar.
  42. United Nations Interactive Dialogue 3 (2015). -- https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Accessed on 2.1.2020.
  43. Wortzel R. (1979). New Life Style Determinants of Women’s Food Shopping Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43: 28-29.



  1. Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: The request was aborted: Could not create SSL/TLS secure channel.

Pragati Jain, Prerna Jain, Roopesh Kaushik, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2020, pp. 47-61, DOI:10.3280/EFE2020-001004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche