Clicca qui per scaricare

La qualità dei dati all’interno dell’evoluzione dei servizi territoriali: il caso del Servizio Dipendenze
Titolo Rivista: MECOSAN 
Autori/Curatori: Silvana Secinaro, Davide Calandra, Carolina Cappa, Emanuele Bignamini 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: 116  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  21 P. 31-51 Dimensione file:  293 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MESA2020-116003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

L’articolo ha l’obiettivo di analizzare la percezione degli operatori sanitari e i loro bisogni in merito alla qualita dei dati in modo da individuare eventuali carenze dei sistemi informativi utilizzati. Lo studio utilizza una metodologia di analisi qualitativa secondo un approccio induttivo, che si avvale di interviste a campione. I risultati dimostrano come la gestione dei pazienti nel campo delle dipendenze richieda appositi strumenti informativi e la creazione di un processo interno strutturato che valorizzi, in primis, gli operatori sanitari e, in secundis, i dati per la valutazione epidemiologica dei pazienti. La ricerca attraverso una discussione dei risultati basata sull’analisi SWOT conferma l’esigenza di attivare attivita di formazione mirate nonche la costruzione di sistemi standardizzati di gestione dei dati che possano aiutare gli operatori a comprenderne le modalita di inserimento e di successiva valorizzazione.

Keywords: Qualita dei dati, sanita, gestione pazienti, management sanitario, cartella clinica elettronica, dipendenze.

  1. Acampora G., Cook D.J., Rashidi P. and Vasilakos A.V. (2013). A Survey on Ambient Intelligence in Health Care. Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 101(12): 2470-2494.
  2. Bartunek J.M. (2007). Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1323-1333.
  3. Batini C. and Scannapieco M. (2008). Qualità dei dati: concetti, metodi e tecniche. Berlino, Germania: Springer Science & Business Media.
  4. Biancone P., Secinaro S., Brescia V. and Calandra D. (2019a). Management of Open Innovation in Healthcare for Cost Accounting Using HER. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4): 99.
  5. Biancone P.P., Secinaro S., Brescia V. and Calandra D. (2019b). Data Quality Methods and Applications in Health Care System: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(4): 35.
  6. Borgonovi E., Rivenbark W.C. and Bianchi C. (2017). Introduction to the Symposium on Exploring the Complexities of Performance Management. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(10): 805-807.
  7. Breakwell G.M., Hammond S. and Fife-Schaw C. (2000). Research Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.
  8. Casalini F., Seghieri C., Emdin M. and Nuti S. (2017). Nuovi strumenti di management per la gestione integrata dei percorsi assistenziali dei pazienti cronici. Mecosan, 102: 35-59., DOI: 10.3280/MESA2017-102003
  9. Charmaz K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications – Available at: (accessed 11 June 2020).
  10. Dal Mas F., Matos F., Vairinhos V., Selig P.M. and Edvinsson L. (2019). The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Sustainability: An Analysis of Practitioner’s Thought. Intellectual Capital Management as a Driver of Sustainability: Perspectives for Organizations and Society. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 11-24.
  11. Davidson E. and Chiasson M. (2005). Contextual Influences on Technology Use Mediation: A Comparative Analysis of Electronic Medical Record Systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 14.
  12. Demirhan H. (2020). The Control of Transfer Pricing of Corporations by Blockchain Technology: Challenges and Solutions, Handbook of Research on Strategic Fit and Design in Business Ecosystems. IGI Global.
  13. Demirkan H. (2013). A Smart Healthcare Systems Framework. IT Professional, 15(5): 38-45.
  14. Dipartimento per le politiche antidroga (2018). Relazione annuale al Parlamento sul fenomeno delle Tossicopendenze in Italia Anno 2018 (Dati 2017). Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Available at: (accessed 30 December 2018).
  15. D.P.R. n. 309/1990 (1990). Testo unico delle leggi in materia di disciplina degli stupefacenti e sostanze psicotrope, prevenzione, cura e riabilitazione dei relativi stati di tossicodipendenza. – Available at: (accessed 21 August 2019).
  16. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (2017). Drug treatment expenditure: a methodological overview, EMCDDA Insights 24, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  17. Ferri M., Dias S., Bo A., Ballotta D., Simon R. and Carrà G. (2016). Quality assurance in drug demand reduction in European countries: an overview. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 25: 2, 198-204., DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2016.1236904
  18. Fichman R., Kohli R. and Krishnan R. (2011). Editorial Overview: The Role of Information Systems in Healthcare: Current Research and Future Trends. Information Systems Research, 22: 419-428.
  19. Gibbert M. and Ruigrok W. (2010). The ‘“What”’ and ‘“How”’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4): 710-737.
  20. Glasner-Edwards S. and Rawson R. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Addiction Treatment: Review and Recommendations for Public Policy. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 97(2-3): 93-104.
  21. Hardee K. (2008). Data Quality Audit Tool: Guidelines for implementation. – Available at: (accessed 3 December 2018).
  22. Hser Y.-I., Longshore D. and Anglin M.D. (2007). The life course perspective on drug use: a conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Evaluation Review, 31(6): 515-547.
  23. Hsieh H.-F. and Shannon S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277-1288.
  24. Islam M.S., Hasan M.M., Wang X., Germack H.D. and Noor-E-Alam M. (2018). A Systematic Review on Healthcare Analytics: Application and Theoretical Perspective of Data Mining. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 6(2).
  25. ISO (2015). Data quality – Part 8: Information and data quality: Concepts and measuring. ISO – Available at: (accessed 3 December 2018).
  26. Iyawa G.E., Herselman M. and Botha A. (2016). Digital Health Innovation Ecosystems: From Systematic Literature Review to Conceptual Framework. Procedia Computer Science, 100: 244-252.
  27. Kerr K., Norris T. and Stockdale R. (2007). Data quality Information and Decision Making: A Healthcare Case Study. Presented at the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Toowoomba – Available at: (accessed 30 December 2018).
  28. Kerr K.A., Norris T. and Stockdale R. (2008). The strategic management of data quality in healthcare. Health Informatics Journal, 14(4): 259-266.
  29. Kuckartz U. and Rädiker S. (2019). Working with Coded Segments and Memos. In: Kuckartz U. and Rädiker S. (Eds.). Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video, 107-122. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  30. Latorre V., Prenestini A. and Semisa D. (2016). Il Performance Management nei Dipartimenti di Salute Mentale (DSM): proposta di un cruscotto multidimensionale e prospettive di implementazione. Mecosan, 97: 71-89., DOI: 10.3280/MESA2016-097005
  31. Ledikwe J.H., Grignon J., Lebelonyane R., Ludick S., Matshediso E., Sento B.W., ... and Semo B.W. (2014). Improving the quality of health information: a qualitative assessment of data management and reporting systems in Botswana. Health research policy and systems, 12(1): 1-10.
  32. Levin-Zamir D. and Peterburg Y. (2001). Health literacy in health systems: perspectives on patient self-management in Israel. Health promotion international, 16(1): 87-94.
  33. McLellan A., Lewis D. and Kleber H. (2000). Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA, 284(13): 1689-1695.
  34. McLellan A.T., Lewis D.C., O’Brien C.P. and Kleber H.D. (2000). Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA, 284(13): 1689-1695.
  35. Mehmetoglu M. and Altinay L. (2006). Examination of grounded theory analysis with an application to hospitality research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25: 12-33.
  36. Menon G., Raghubir P. and Agrawal N. (2006). Health Risk Perceptions and Consumer Psychology. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-27.
  37. OECD (2019). Health at a Glance. – Available at: (accessed 3 December 2018).
  38. Orlikowski W. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11: 404-428.
  39. Pai F.-Y. and Huang K.-I. (2011). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4): 650-660.
  40. Pramanik I., Lau R., Demirkan H. and Azad M. (2017). Smart Health: Big Data Enabled Health Paradigm within Smart Cities. Expert Systems with Applications, 87.
  41. Riley M. (2019). The Mentoring Networks of Outdoor Educators. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 11(3): 207-221.
  42. Rowley J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, 35(3/4): 260-271.
  43. Saitz R., Larson M.J., LaBelle C., Richardson J. and Samet J.H. (2008). The Case for Chronic Disease Management for Addiction. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 2(2): 55-65.
  44. Schalk-Zaitsev S. (2011). Engaging stakeholders in health system assessments: a guide for hsa teams. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) – Available at: (accessed 16 January 2019).
  45. Silverman D. (2010). Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
  46. Skyttberg N., Vicente J., Chen R., Blomqvist H. and Koch S. (2016). How to improve vital sign data quality for use in clinical decision support systems? A qualitative study in nine Swedish emergency departments. Bmc Medical Informatics And Decision Making, 16(1): 61.
  47. Storti C.C., De Grauwe P., Sabadash A. and Montanari L. (2011). Unemployment and drug treatment. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22(5): 366-373.
  48. Strauss A. and Corbin J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In: Denzin N.K. and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research, 273-285. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
  49. van der Heide I., Poureslami I., Mitic W., Shum J., Rootman I. and FitzGerald J.M. (2018). Health literacy in chronic disease management: a matter of interaction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 102: 134-138.
  50. Verma R. (2014). Data quality and clinical audit. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 15(8): 392-394.
  51. Wagner E.H. (2000). The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7234): 569-572.
  52. Wills M.J. (2014). Decisions through data: Analytics in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management, 59(4): 254-262.
  53. World Health Organization (2003). Improving Data Quality: A Guide for Developing Countries. Manila: World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Western Pacific.
  54. World Health Organization (2010). Monitoring the Building Blocks of Health Systems: A Handbook of Indicators and Their Measurement Strategies. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  55. Xu H. (2011). Data quality issues for accounting information systems’ implementation: Systems, stakeholders, and organizational factors. Journal of Technology Research, 1: 11.
  56. Zuccolo L. (2013). Claudia Costa Storti, Paul De Grauwe (eds.), Illicit Trade And Global Economy. Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea, 13(1) – Available at: (accessed 26 July 2020).

  1. Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found.

Silvana Secinaro, Davide Calandra, Carolina Cappa, Emanuele Bignamini, in "MECOSAN" 116/2020, pp. 31-51, DOI:10.3280/MESA2020-116003


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche