Click here to download

Socio-legal introductory remarks for a debate on law, artificial intelligence and big data
Author/s: Vincenzo Ferrari 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 9-32 FullText PDF:  302 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2020-003001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This article discusses the relationships between law, artificial intelligence and big data from a socio-legal perspective. The author wonders about the extent to which these technologies can pave the way to a kind of algorithmic legal regulation, consisting of unequivocal signals that would produce effects automatically, whereas law consists of signs to be interpreted by social actors and relies upon the decisions made by "third parties" in case of conflicts. Following this reasoning, he subjects the different levels of a legal system - i.e. legislation, contracts, administration and the judiciary - to separate examinations, shedding light on what a legal system has already achieved through access to new technologies, as well as on the hitherto unresolved doubts about how far these can go in the world of law. The article ends up by stressing that, as is already well known, the algorithmic revolution may put basic constitutional rights in real jeopardy, and by framing other questions about its impact on legal culture and legal education.
Keywords: Law - New communication technologies - Signals vs. Signs - Automation vs. Decision - Achievements and Doubts

  1. Alpa, Guido (a cura di), 2020. Diritto e intelligenza artificiale. Pisa: Pacini.
  2. Avella, Davide, 2016. (Blog), 28 luglio 2016, -- (visitato il 24 agosto 2020).
  3. Bales, Kevin, 2016. Blood and Earth. Modern Slavery, Ecocide, and the Secret to Saving the World. New York: Spiegel and Grau.
  4. Basile, Fabio, 2019. Intelligenza artificiale e diritto penale: quattro possibili percorsi di indagine. Diritto penale e uomo, 3: 1-33.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre, 1986. La force du droit. Éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 64: 2-19.
  6. Campione, Roger, 2020. La plausibilidad del derecho en la era de la inteligencia artificial. Filosofía carbónica y filosofía silícica del derecho. Madrid: Dykinson.
  7. Castelli, Claudio, & Daniela Piana, 2018. Giustizia predittiva. La qualità della giustizia in due tempi. Questione giustizia, -- (visitato il 24 agosto 2020).
  8. Cavallo, Alberto, & Roberto Rigobon, 2016. The Billion Prices Project: Using Online Prices for Measurement and Research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30, 2: 151-78.
  9. Cominelli, Luigi, 2018. Cognition of the Law. Toward a Cognitive Sociology of Law and Behavior. Cham: Springer.
  10. Commissione Europea, 2020. Libro bianco sull’intelligenza artificiale – Un approccio europeo all’eccellenza e alla fiducia. Bruxelles.
  11. Daugherty, Paul R., & Jim Wilson, 2019. Human + Machine. Ripensare il lavoro nell’età dell’intelligenza artificiale, Milano: Guerini. (Edizione originale: Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Accenture Global Solutions Ltd, Boston, HBR Press, 2018).
  12. De Masi, Domenico, 2017. Lavorare gratis, lavorare tutti. Perché il futuro è dei disoccupati. Milano: Rizzoli.
  13. De Spiegeleier, Antoine, 2018. Data ergo sum? Analyse en cercles concentriques des implications du phénomène des Big Data pour l’humanité et le vivre ensemble. Revue Internationale d’Études Juridiques, 81: 371-373.
  14. Devins, Caryn, Teppo Felin, Stuart Kauffman & Roger Koppl, 2017. The Law and Big Data. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 27: 357-413.
  15. Ferrari, Vincenzo, 2010. Prima lezione di sociologia del diritto. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  16. —, 2019. El incierto futuro de los derechos en el trabajo humano. Trabajo y Derecho. Vol 52, Abril: 15.23.
  17. Findlay, Mark, 2019. Future Lawyers or Robots with Big Data? PDF, Materials for the master course at the IISL Oñati, 2019.
  18. Frade, Carlos, 2016. Social Theory and the Politics of Big Data and Method. Sociology, 50: 863-877., DOI: 10.1177/003803515614186
  19. Friedman, Lawrence M., 1975. The Legal System. A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage. (Edizione italiana Il sistema giuridico nella prospettiva delle scienze sociali, a cura di Giovanni Tarello, Bologna, il Mulino, 1978.)
  20. —, 2001. Erewhon: The Coming Global Legal Order. Stanford Journal of International Law, XXXVII: 347-64.
  21. —, 2016. Impact. How Law Affects Behavior. Cambridge, Mass., and London, England: Harvard University Press.
  22. Frosini, Vittorio, 1968. Cibernetica, diritto e società. Milano: Comunità.
  23. Garapon, Antoine, & Jean Lassègue, 2018. Justice digitale. Révolution graphique et rupture anthropologique. Paris: PUF.
  24. Governatori, Guido, Florian Idelberger, Zoran Milosevic & Regis Riveret, 2018. On Legal Contracts, Imperative and Declarative Smart Contracts, and Blockchain Systems. Artificial Intelligence & Law, 26: 377-409.
  25. Hacker, Philipp, Ralf Krestel, Stefan Grundmann & Felix Naumann, 2020. Explainable AI under Contract and Tort Law: Legal Incentives and Technical Challenges. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28: 415-439.
  26. Hildebrandt, Mireille, 2015. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology. Chaltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  27. Hirsch, Fred, 1976. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. (Edizione italiana: I limiti sociali allo sviluppo, a cura di Alberto Martinelli, Milano, Bompiani 1981).
  28. Irti, Natalino, 2007. Il salvagente della forma. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  29. Kafteranis, Dimitrios, 2019. Can Artificial Intelligence Replace Whistle-blowers in the Business Sector?. International Journal of Technology Policy and Law, Vol. 3, n. 2, 150-171., DOI: 10.1504/IJTPL2019.104948.
  30. Kelsen, Hans, 1934. Reine Rechtslehre. Leipzig-Wien: Franz Deuticke Verlag. (Edizione italiana La dottrina pura del diritto, a cura di Renato Treves, Torino, Einaudi, 1952, ora Lineamenti di dottrina pura del diritto, Torino, Einaudi).
  31. —, 1979. Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Wien: Manz‘sche Verlag und Universitätsbuchhandlung. (Edizione italiana Teoria generale delle norme, a cura di Mario G. Losano, Torino, Einaudi, 1985).
  32. Lafargue, Paul, 18832. Le droit à la paresse. Réfutation du droit au travail de 1848 [1880]. Paris: Oriol.
  33. Lagoze, Carl, 2014. Big Data, Data Integrity, and the Fracturing of the Control Zone. Big Data & Society, July-December: 1-11., DOI: 10.1177/2053951D714558281
  34. Laney, D., 2001. 3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity and Variety. META Group Research Note, 6.
  35. Larsson, Stefan, 2019. The Socio-legal Relevance of Artificial Intelligence. Droit et Société, 103: 573-93.
  36. Lauslahti, Kristian, Juri Mattila &Timo Seppälä, 2017. Smart Contracts – How Will Blockchain Technology Affect Contractual Practices?. ETLA Report, 68, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), Helsinki.
  37. Lazer, David, & Jason Radford, 2017. Data ex Machina: Introduction to Big Data. Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 29-39.
  38. Licoppe, Christian, & Laurence Dumoulin, 2019. Le travail des juges et les algorithmes de traitement de la jurisprudence. Premières analyses d’une expérimentation de ‘justice prédictive’ en France. Droit et Société, 103: 535-54.
  39. Losano, Mario G., 1969. Giuscibernetica. Macchine e modelli cibernetici nel diritto. Torino: Einaudi.
  40. Luhmann, Niklas, 1972. Rechtssoziologie. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. (Edizione italiana Sociologia del diritto, a cura di Alberto Febbrajo, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 1977).
  41. —, 1993. Das Recht der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. (Edizione italiana Il diritto della società, a cura di Luisa Avitabile, Torino, Giappichelli, 2012).
  42. Lyon, David, 2014. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique. Big Data & Society, July-September, 1-13., DOI: 10.1177/2053951714541861
  43. Manyika, James, Susan Lund, Michael Chui, Jacques Bughin, Jonathan Woetzel, Parul Batra, Ryan Ko & Saurabh Sanghvi, 2017. What the Future of Work Will Mean for Jobs, Skills, and Wages. McKinsey Global Institute Report, November 2017.
  44. Medvedeva, Masha, Michel Vols & Martijn Wieling, 2020. Using Machine Learning to Predict Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 18127-266.
  45. Morente Parra, Vanesa, 2019. Big Data o el arte de analizar datos masivos. Una reflexión crítica desde los derechos fundamentales. Derechos y libertades, 41, II: 225-60. DOI 10 14679/1216.
  46. Ost, François, 2018. Recensione a A. Garapon & J. Lassègue, Justice digitale. Revue Internationale d’Études Juridiques, 2018, 81: 395-403.
  47. Pagallo, Ugo, 2020. Algoritmi e conoscibilità. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, IX, 1: 93-106.
  48. Palmirani, Monica, 2020. Big Data e conoscenza. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, IX, 1:73-91.
  49. Perelman, Chaïm, 1945. De la justice, Bruxelles: Institut Solvay. (Edizione italiana La giustizia, prefazione di Norberto Bobbio, Torino: Giappichelli, 1959).
  50. Pocar, Valerio, 2005. Gli animali non umani. Per una sociologia dei diritti. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  51. Rissland, Edwina L., 1990. Artificial Intelligence and Law: Stepping Stones to a Model of Legal Reasoning. Yale Law Journal, 99, 8: 1957-1981.
  52. Rifkin, Jeremy, 1995. The End of Work. The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-market Era. New York: G.B. Putnam’s Sons.
  53. —, 2014. Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. Basingstoke-New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  54. Romeo, Francesco, 2020. Giustizia e produttività. Un percorso dal machine learning al concetto di diritto. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, IX, 1: 107-21.
  55. Rouvroy, Antoinette, 2018. Homo juridicus est-il soluble dans les données ? In Aa. Vv., Law, Norms and Freedom in Cyberspace – Droit, normes et libertés dans le cybermonde. Liber Amicorum Yves Poullet. Bruxelles: Larcier.
  56. Runciman, Walter Garrison, 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Edizione italiana Ineguaglianza e coscienza sociale. L’idea di giustizia nelle classi lavoratrici, a cura di Angelo Pichierri, Torino, Einaudi, 1972).
  57. Russell, Bertrand, 1932. In Praise of Idleness. Harper’s Magazine, October 1932 (quindi in Bertrand Russell, In Praise of Idleness and Other Essays, London: Routledge, 1935).
  58. Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig, 2010. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd edition), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  59. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, 1995. Toward a New Common Sense. Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.
  60. Sartor, Giovanni, 2020. Introduzione al dossier a cura di Giovanni Sartor, “L’intelligenza artificiale e il diritto”. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, IX, 165-70.
  61. Scarpelli, Uberto, [1965]1997. Cos’è il positivismo giuridico. Nuova edizione a cura di Alfonso Catania & Mario Jori. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  62. Schubert, Glendon, 1965. The Judicial Mind. Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1973. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  63. —, 1974. The Judicial Mind Revisited. Psychometric Analysis of Supreme Court Ideology. London-Toronto: Oxford University Press.
  64. Searle, John R., 1996. Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  65. Simonelli, Maria Ausilia, 2020. Algoritmo versus ermeneutica giudiziaria. L’utopia della ‘matematizzazione’ del diritto. In Annali del Dipartimento Giuridico dell’Università degli Studi del Molise, 21/2020: 365-75.
  66. Sommaggio, Paolo, & Matteo Bovo, 2021. Nuove strategie per la formazione giuridica. Torino: Giappichelli.
  67. Supiot, Alain, 2015. La gouvernance par les nombres. Cours au Collège de France (2012-2014). Paris: Fayard.
  68. Susskind, Richard, 2008. The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  69. —, 2019a. L’avvocato di domani. Il futuro della professione legale tra evoluzione tecnologica e intelligenza artificiale. Milano: Guerini. (Edizione originale Lawyers. An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, 20172).
  70. —, 2019b. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  71. Teubner, Gunther, 1997. Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In Gunther Teubner, ed., Global Law without a State. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  72. Timmer, Ivan, & Rachel Rietveld, 2019. Rule-based Systems for Decisions Support and Decision-making in Dutch Legal Practice. A Brief Overview of Applications and Implications. Droit et Société, 103: 517-34.
  73. Tomeo, Vincenzo, [1981]2013. Il diritto come struttura del conflitto. Una analisi sociologica. Nuova edizione con introduzione di Bruno M. Bilotta. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  74. Walton, Douglas N., Giovanni Sartor & Fabrizio Macagno. An Argumentation Framework for Contested Cases of Statutory Interpretation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 24: 51-91.
  75. West, Darrell M., 2018. The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  76. Žliobaitė, Indrė, & Bart Custers, 2016. Using Sensitive Personal Data May Be Necessary for Avoiding Discrimination in Data-driven Decision Models. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 24: 183-201.
  77. Zwitter, Andrej, & Amelia Hadfield, 2014. Governing Big Data. Politics and Governance, 2, 1: 1-3.

Vincenzo Ferrari, Socio-legal introductory remarks for a debate on law, artificial intelligence and big data in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2020, pp. 9-32, DOI:10.3280/SD2020-003001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content