The intricacies of power relations and digital technologies in organizational processes

Titolo Rivista STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
Autori/Curatori Attila Bruni, Francesco Miele, Daniel Pittino, Lia Tirabeni
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/1 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 18 P. 7-24 Dimensione file 238 KB
DOI 10.3280/SO2021-001001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The relationship between power, technology and organizing is a longstanding theme in organization studies, typically articulated along two polarized positions: a pessimistic and an optimistic one. Both positions assume a deterministic view in which technology "impacts" society and organizations, thus missing the intricate and often ambiguous dynamics that surround power and technology. Accordingly, this Special Issue focuses on the intricacies of power, digital technologies and organizational processes. Presenting the rationale of the papers that compose the Special Issue, we suggest five themes arising when empirically and theoretically approaching these intricacies: 1) digital technologies and power relationships in organizational structure and processes; 2) relationships between technology, power and workers’ participation; 3) digital technologies, algorithmic control and power renegotiation; 4) digital technologies, practices of human resources management and the joint design of technology, work, and organization; 5) hyper-industrialization as a critical lens to approach technology, work, and organizing. Taken all together, the papers help overcoming simplifications as well as polarized representations of the relationship between power, digital technologies and organizing.

La relazione tra potere, tecnologia e processi organizzativi è un tema di lunga data negli studi organizzativi, tipicamente articolato lungo due principali posizioni polarizzate: una pessimistica e una ottimistica, entrambe caratterizzate da una visione deterministica per cui la tecnologia "impatta" la società e le organizzazioni. A ben vedere, tuttavia, questa visione deterministica manca di cogliere le complesse, e spesso ambigue, dinamiche che caratterizzano la relazione fra potere e tecnologia. Il presente Special Issue si focalizza al contrario sulle complessità della relazione fra potere, tecnologie digitali e processi organizzativi. Nel presentare le ragioni degli articoli che compongono lo Special Issue, si suggeriscono cinque tematiche emergenti quando si approcciano empiricamente e teoricamente tali complessità: 1) tecnologie digitali e relazioni di potere nella struttura e nei processi organizzativi; 2) il legame fra tecnologia, potere e partecipazione dei lavoratori; 3) tecnologie digitali, controllo algoritmico e rinegoziazione del potere; 4) tecnologie digitali, pratiche di gestione delle risorse umane e progettazione congiunta di tecnologia, lavoro e organizzazione; 5) l’iperindustrializzazione come approccio critico per meglio comprendere la relazione fra tecnologia, lavoro e organizzazione. Presi insieme, questi articoli vanno oltre la semplificazione e la polarizzazione che caratterizza il dibattito e offrono una rappresentazione sfumata della relazione fra potere, tecnologia e organizzazione.

Keywords:potere, tecnologia digitale, processi organizzativi, gestione algoritmica, pratiche di lavoro

  1. Hall, J.V., Horton, J.J., Knoepfle, D.T. (2019), “Pricing efficiently in designed markets: The case of ride-sharing”, available at https://john-joseph-horton.com/papers/uber_price.pdf.
  2. Hallett, T., Ventresca, M.J. (2007), “Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy”, Theory and Society, 35(2): 213-236,
  3. Honold, L. (1997), “A review of the literature on employee empowerment”, Empowerment in Organizations, 5(4): 202–212, DOI: 10.1108/1463444971019547
  4. Introna, L.D., Hayes, N., Al-Hejin, Z. (2019), “The Negotiated Order and Electronic Patient Records: A Sociomaterial Perspective”, Journal of Information Technology, 34(4): 333-349, DOI: 10.1177/026839621987054
  5. Ivanova, M., Bronowicka, J., Kocher, E., Degner, A. (2018), Foodora and Deliveroo: The app as a boss? Control and autonomy in app-based management: The case of food delivery riders, Dusseldorf, Germany: Hans Bockler Stiftung.
  6. Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V. (2008), “Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization”, The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1): 433-474.
  7. Hackman, J.R., Oldham G.R. (1976), “Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory”, Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2): 250-279.
  8. Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., Milkman, R. (2019), “Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work”, Socius, 5: 1–15, DOI: 10.1177/237802311987004
  9. Gouldner, A.W. (1954), Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, IL: Free.
  10. Giardullo, P., Miele, F. (2020), “L’organizzazione algoritmica: tecnologia, performance, automazione. In: Marini, D., Setiffi, F. (eds.)”, Una grammatica della digitalizzazione. Interpretare la metamorfosi di società, economia e organizzazioni. Milano: Guerini Scientifica.
  11. Genin, E. (2016), “Proposal for a theoretical framework for the analysis of time porosity”, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 32(3): 280–300.
  12. Frey, C.B, Osborne, M.A. (2017), “The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?”, Technological forecasting and social change, 114: 254–280,
  13. Foster, J.B., McChesney, R.W. (2014), “Surveillance capitalism: Monopoly-finance capital, the military-industrial complex, and the digital age”, Monthly Review, 66: 1-31, DOI: 10.14452/MR-066-03-2014-07_1
  14. Fleming, P. (2019), “Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job”, Organization Studies, 40(1): 23-38, DOI: 10.1177/017084061876556
  15. Eubanks, V. (2018), Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  16. Edwards, R.C. (1978), “The Social Relations of Production at the Point of Production”, Insurgent Sociologist, 8(2–3): 109-125, DOI: 10.1177/08969205780080021
  17. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., McDonnell, A. (2020), “Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM”, Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1): 114-132, DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.1225
  18. De Stefano, V. (2016), The rise of the «just-in-time workforce»: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the «gig-economy». Geneva: ILO Working Paper,
  19. Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., Parker, G. (2018), “Introduction – Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age”, Information Systems Research, 29: 3-6,
  20. Connelly, C.E., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., Škerlavaj, M. (2019), “Understanding knowledge hiding in organizations”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7): 779-782,
  21. Cheng, M.M., Hackett, R.D. (2021), “A critical review of algorithms in HRM: definition, theory, and practice”, Human Resource Management Review, 31(1): 100698,
  22. Castells, M. (2007), “Communication, power and counter-power in the network society”, International journal of communication, 1(29): 238-266.
  23. Burns, T., Stalker, G. (1961), The Management of Innovation. London, Tavinstock.
  24. Bruni, A., Miele, F., Pittino, D., Tirabeni, L. (2020), “On the dualistic nature of power and (digital) technology in organizing processes”, Studi Organizzativi, 50th Anniversary Special Issue: 209-221, DOI: 10.3280/SO2020-001-S101
  25. Bruni, A., Esposito, F.M. (2019), “It obliges you to do things you normally wouldn’t”: Organizing and consuming private life in the age of AirBnB, Partecipazione e conflitto, 12(3): 265-290,
  26. Orlikowski, W.J. (2007), “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology At Work”, Organization Studies, 28(9): 1435–1448, DOI: 10.1177/0170840607081138
  27. Perrow, C. (1967), “A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations”, American sociological review: 194-208.
  28. Pickering, A. (1993), “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science”, American Journal of Sociology, 99(3): 559-589.
  29. Plesner, U., Husted, E. (2020), Digital organizing: Revisiting themes in organization studies. Red Globe Press.
  30. Plesner, U., Raviola, E. (2016), “Digital technologies and a changing profession”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(7): 1044-1065.
  31. Sadowski, J. (2015), “From mega-machines to mega-algorithms”. Available at the website: thenewinquiry.com/from-mega-machines-to-mega-algorithms.
  32. Scholz, T., Schneider, N. (eds.) (2017), Ours to hack and to own: The rise of platform cooperativism, a new vision for the future of work and a fairer internet. NY: OR books.
  33. Sewell, G., Taskin, L. (2015), “Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework”, Organization Studies, 36(11): 1507-1529, DOI: 10.1177/0170840615593587
  34. Shestakofsky, B. (2017), “Working algorithms: Software automation and the future of work”, Work and Occupations, 44: 376-423, DOI: 10.1177/0730888417726119
  35. Spencer, D.A. (2018), “Fear and hope in an age of mass automation: debating the future of work”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 33: 1-12,
  36. Susskind, R., Susskind, D. (2015), The future of the professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in action, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  38. Tipping, S., Chanfreau, J., Perry, J., Tait, C. (2012), “The fourth work–life balance employee survey”. In Employment relations research series. London, England: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.
  39. Veen, A., Barratt, T., Goods, C. (2019), “Platform-capital’s ‘appetite’ for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia”, Work, Employment and Society, 34(3): 388-406. DOI: 10.1177/0950017019836911.
  40. Woodward, J. (1958), Management and technology, London: H.M.S.O.
  41. Zuboff, S. (2019), The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, London: Profile Books.
  42. Beverungen, A., Beyes, T., Conrad, L. (2019), “The Organizational Powers of (Digital) Media”, Organization, 26(5): 621-635, DOI: 10.1177/135050841986720
  43. Bastian, B., Haslam, N. (2011), “Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4): 295-303, DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2011.61413
  44. Aldrich, H., Herker, D. (1977), “Boundary spanning roles and organization structure”, Academy of management review, 2(2): 217-230.
  45. Alaimo, C., Kallinikos, J. (2020), “Managing by Data: Algorithmic Categories and Organizing”, Organization, First published online: July 2, 2020, DOI: 10.1177/017084062093406
  46. Alaimo, C., Kallinikos, J. (2019), “Social media and the infrastructuring of sociality”, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 62: 289–306, DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X2019000006201
  47. Jabagi, N., Croteau, A.M., Audebrand, L.K., Marsan, J. (2019), “Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4): 192-213, DOI: 10.1108/JMP-06-2018-025
  48. Jarrahi, M.H., Sutherland, W., Nelson, S.B., Sawyer, S. (2019), “Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices, 29: 153–189,
  49. Kellogg, K.C., Valentine, M.A., Christin, A. (2020), “Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control”, Academy of Management Annals, 14(1): 366-410,
  50. Kemmer, L., Kühn, A., Otto, B., Weber, V. (2021), “Standby: Organizing modes of in| activity”, Ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 21: 1-20.
  51. Kost, D., Fieseler, C., Wong, S.I. (2018), “Finding meaning in a hopeless place? The construction of meaningfulness in digital microwork”, Computers in Human Behavior, 82: 101-110,
  52. Kunda, G. (2009), Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. PA: Temple University Press.
  53. Lawrence, P.R., Lorsch, J.W. (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and integration. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  54. Leonardi, D., Murgia, A., Armano, E. (2020), “Piattaforme digitali e forme di resistenza della soggettività precaria: un’inchiesta sul lavoro gratuito e la mobilitazione dei riders di Foodora a Torino”. In: Armano, E. (ed.) Pratiche di inchiesta e conricerca oggi. Verona: Ombre Corte.
  55. Liu, M., Brynjolfsson, E., Dowlatabadi, J. (2018). Do digital platforms reduce moral hazard? The case of Uber and taxis, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  56. Meyer, U., Shaupp, S., Seibt, D. (2019), “Toward an Analytical Understanding of Domination and Emancipation in Digitalizing Industries”. In Meyer U., Shaupp S., Seibt D. (eds.), Digitalization in Industry: Between Domination and Emancipation. London and New York, Palgrave, p. 1-25.
  57. Miele, F., Tirabeni, L. (2020), “Digital technologies and power dynamics in the organization: A conceptual review of remote working and wearable technologies at work”, Sociology Compass, 14(6): e12795,
  58. Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  59. Mollick, E., Werbach, K. (2015), “Gamification and the enterprise”. In:  Walz, S.P., Deterding, S. (eds.) The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications, 439.
  60. Mokyr, J., Vickers, C., Ziebarth, N.L. (2015), “The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29: 31–50.
  61. Moore, P.V. (2018), “Tracking affective labour for agility in the quantified workplace”, Body & Society, 24: 39-67, DOI: 10.1177/1357034X18775203
  62. Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
  63. Norlander, P., Jukic, N., Varma, A., Nestorov, S. (2020), “The effects of technological supervision on gig workers: organizational control and motivation of Uber, taxi, and limousine drivers”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management: 1-25, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2020.1867614
  64. Nylén, D., Holmström, J. (2015), “Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation”, Business Horizons, 58 (1): 57–67,
  65. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Broadway Books.

  • Beyond the Swipe: Investigating the Interplay of Technology, Media, and Human Behavior in Digital Romance Ning Li, Bin Wang, Yanglin Li, Hao Pang, Xingzhi Han, in Journal of the Knowledge Economy /2024
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-01802-6
  • Engaging the body, appropriating a corporate wellness programme Enrico Attila Bruni, Filippo Andrei, Lia Tirabeni, in Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal /2022 pp.88
    DOI: 10.1108/QROM-02-2022-2296
  • Integration of parametric modeling tools in small architectural offices – between constraints and organizational strategies Adeline Stals, Catherine Elsen, Sylvie Jancart, in Architectural Engineering and Design Management /2022 pp.759
    DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2022.2050347
  • Reintroducing technology to the coworking debate: prospects and problematics Maddalena Sorrentino, Lia Tirabeni, Maria Laura Toraldo, in STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI 2/2023 pp.70
    DOI: 10.3280/SO2022-002003

Attila Bruni, Francesco Miele, Daniel Pittino, Lia Tirabeni, The intricacies of power relations and digital technologies in organizational processes in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 1/2021, pp 7-24, DOI: 10.3280/SO2021-001001