Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Il concetto di processo analitico e il lavoro di trasformazione
Titolo Rivista: PSICOANALISI 
Autori/Curatori:  Jorge Canestri 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 1  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  48 P. 9-56 Dimensione file:  367 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSI2021-001002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


L’Autore affronta specificamente due argomenti: il concetto di processo psicoanalitico ed il lavoro di trasformazione che in esso si svolge. In particolare, in relazione al lavoro di trasformazione, vengono principalmente esami-nate le vicissitudini di uno degli elementi che contribuiscono a renderlo possibile: la costru-zione, nella mente dell’analista, di segmenti di teoria nel lavoro clinico.


Keywords: Processo, teoria, modelli, trasformazione, teorie implicite

  1. Abend S. (1990). The psychoanalytic process: motives and obstacles in the search for clarification. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59: 532-549.
  2. Amati Mehler J., Argentieri S., Canestri J. (1994). La Babel de l’inconscient. Langue maternelle, langues étrangères et psychanalyse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  3. Moritaké A. (1910). Haiku. In: Revon M. (ed.). Anthologie de la Littérature Japonaise. Paris: Delagrave.
  4. Argentieri S. (2000). La sindrome di Dedalo. In: Aragona R. (a cura di). Le vertigini del labirinto. Milano: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  5. Arlow J., Brenner C. (1990). The psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59: 678-692.
  6. Aulagnier P. (1975). La violence de l’interprétation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  7. Bachelard G. (1934). Le Nouvel Esprit Scientifique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  8. Badiou A. (1969). Le concept de modèle. Paris: François Maspero.
  9. Barande R. (1979). Transmission ou processus? Rev. Franç. Psychanal., 2: 211- 221.
  10. Barande R. (1991). Non seulement – mais encore. Rev. Franç. Psychanal., 2: 453-463.
  11. Baranger M., Baranger W. (1961). La situación analítica como campo dinámico. In: Problemas del campo psicoanalítico. Buenos Aires: Editorial Kargieman, 1969.
  12. Baranger M., Baranger W., Mom J. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64: 1-15.
  13. Bellone E. (2003). La stella nuova. L’evoluzione e il caso Galilei. Torino: Einaudi.
  14. Bentham J. (1813, 1814, 1821). Of Ontology. London: University College London (ed. bilingue De l’ontologie et autres textes sur les fictions. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1997).
  15. Bloch O., Von Warburg W (1960). Le Dictionnaire étymologique. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
  16. Bibring E. (1937). Symposium on the theory of the therapeutic results of psycho-analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 18: 164-183.
  17. Bicchieri C. (1980). Introduzione. In: Modelli e analogie nella scienza. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  18. Bion W.R. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: William Heinemann.
  19. Bion W.R. (1963). Elements of psycho-Analysis. London: William Heinemann.
  20. Bion W.R. (1965). Transformations. London: William Heinemann.
  21. Bion W.R. (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac Books.
  22. Bitbol M. (1997). Mécanique quantique. Une introduction philosophique. Paris: Flammarion.
  23. Bitbol M. (1998). L’aveuglante proximité du réel. Paris: Flammarion.
  24. Boesky D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59: 550-586.
  25. Borges J.L. (1974). El jardín de los senderos que se bifurcan. In: Ficciones. Obras Completas. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.
  26. Botella C. e S. (2001). Figurabilité et régrédience. Rev. Franç. de Psychanal., 55: 5.
  27. Britton R. (1998). Belief and Imagination. Explorations in Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.
  28. Cacciavillani G. (2003). Vademecum Bion. Firenze: Nicomp.
  29. Canestri J. (1986). La fantasia scientifica: una nota di lettura sulla “Sintesi delle nevrosi di traslazione” di S. Freud. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 32: 591-602.
  30. Canestri J. (1991). La passione della lingua originaria nella letteratura e nella psicoanalisi. Il Piccolo Hans, 69, Milano: Media Press.
  31. Canestri J. (1993a). The logic of Freudian research. In: Meghnagi D. (ed.). Freud and Judaism. London: Karnac Books.
  32. Canestri J. (1993b). Il soggetto polilogico. In: Ri-scritture. Roma: Eurelle Edizioni.
  33. Canestri J. (1994a). From Internal Flux to Shared Experience. In: The Analyst Mind: From Listening to Interpretation. London: IPA Press.
  34. Canestri J. (1994b). Transformations. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 1079-1092.
  35. Canestri J. (1995). Einige überlegungen zur Supervision in der psychoanalytischen Ausbildung. In: Hundert Jahre Psychoanalytische Methode. Wiesbaden: Deutsche Psychoanalytische Vereinigung.
  36. Canestri J. (1999a). Development of Affect in Bilingual Patients. 41st. International Psychoanalytical Congress. Santiago de Chile.
  37. Canestri J. (1999b). Alcune note e un esempio su attività linguistica e psicoanalisi. Psicoanalisi, 3, 1: 68-82.
  38. Canestri J. (1999c). Psychoanalytic Heuristics. In: Psychoanalysis on the Move. The Work of Joseph Sandler. London: Routledge.
  39. Canestri J. (2000). Notes on Linguistic Activity and Psychoanalysis. In: Changing Ideas in a Changing World. The Revolution in Psychoanalisis. London and New York: Karnac Books.
  40. Canestri J. (2001). Ferenczi e l’attività linguistica nell’analisi. In: La catastrofe e i suoi simboli. Torino: UTET.
  41. Canestri J. (2002a). Trois, le nombre magique: Green avec Peirce. In: Penser les limites. Écrits en l’honneur d’André Green. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
  42. Canestri J. (2002b). On the Contribution of the Most Recent Research on Language Applied to Psychoanalytic Practice, with Regard to Regional Differences. International Symposium: Psychoanalysis as an Empirical, Interdisciplinary Science, Austrian Accademy of Sciences, Wien (à paraÎtre).
  43. Canestri J. (2003a). The logic of psychoanalytic research. In: Leuzinger Bohleber M., Dreher A.U., Canestri J. (eds.). Pluralism and Unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytic Library.
  44. Canestri J. (2003b). Implicit understanding of clinical material beyond theory. Fédération Européenne de Psychanalyse, Bulletin Spécial à paraÎtre.
  45. Chandrasekhar S. (1990). Verità e bellezza. Milano: Garzanti.
  46. Compton A. (1990). Psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59: 585-598.
  47. Corti M. (1993). Percorsi dell’invenzione. Il linguaggio poetico e Dante. Torino: Einaudi.
  48. Culioli A. (1990). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Paris: Ophrys.
  49. Danon-Boileau L. (1987). Le sujet de l’énonciation. Psychanalyse et linguistique. Paris: Ophrys.
  50. Donnet J.-L. (2001). From the fundamental rule to the analysing situation. Int. J. Psychoanal. 82: 129-140.
  51. Dreher A.U. (2000). Foundations for Conceptual Research in Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Karnac.
  52. Ducrot O. (1984). Le dire et le dit. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
  53. Duhem P. (1906). La teoria fisica. Bologna: il Mulino, 1978.
  54. Etchegoyen H. (1986). Los fundamentos de la técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores.
  55. Fain M. (1969). Ébauche d’une recherche concernant l’existence d’activités mentales pouvant être considérées come prototipiques du processus psychanalytique. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 33, 5.
  56. Freud S. (1913). On beginning the treatment (further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis). In: SE, vol. XII. London: Hogarth Press.
  57. Freud S. (1915). Uebersicht der Uebertragungsneurosen. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
  58. Freud S. (1916-17). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. In: SE, vol. XVI. London: Hogarth Press.
  59. Freud S. (1933) Sándor Ferenczi. In: SE, vol XXII. London: Hogarth Press.
  60. Galatzer-Levy R.M. (1995). Psychoanalysis and dynamical systems theory: prediction and self-similarity. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 43: 1085-1113.
  61. Giorello G. (1976). Introduzione. In: Lakatos. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  62. Giorello G. (1990). Introduzione. In: Hadamard. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  63. Green A. (1973). Le discours vivant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  64. Green A. (1984). Le langage dans la psychanalyse. In: Langages. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
  65. Green A. (1993). Le Travail du Négatif. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  66. Green A. (2000). Le temps éclaté. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  67. Green A. (2001). Mythes et réalités sur le processus psychanalytique I et II. Rev. Franç. Psychosom., 20: 75-96.
  68. Green A. (2002). Idées directrices pour une psychanalyse contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  69. Greenacre P. (1968). The psychoanalytic process, transference, and acting out. Int. J. Psychoanal., 49: 211-218.
  70. Grubrich-Simitis I. (1985). Metapsychologie und Metabiologie Zu Sigmund Freuds Entwurf einer Uebersicht der Uebertragungsneurosen. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
  71. Grubrich-Simitis I. (1986). Six letters of Sigmund freud and Sandor Ferenczi on the interrelationship of psychoanalytic theory and technique. Int. Rev. Psycho-Anal., 13: 259-277.
  72. Guttman S. et al. (eds.) (1980). Concordance to the psychological works of S. Freud. Boston: G.K. Hall & Co.
  73. Hadamard J. (1945). The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton: University Press.
  74. Heimann P. (1950). On counter-transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 31: 81-84.
  75. Heisenberg W. (1942). Les différents régions de réalité. In: Le Manuscrit de 1942. Paris: Edition Allia.
  76. Hesse M. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Indiana: University Notre Dame Press.
  77. Klimovsky G. (1982). Concepto de proceso. Revista del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Suplemento Psicopatologico, pp. 7-10.
  78. Köhler W. (1930). Gestaltpsychology. New York 1947.
  79. Kuhn T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  80. Kuhn T.S. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  81. Lacan J. (1958). La direction de la cure et les principes de son pouvoir, dans Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1966.
  82. Lakatos I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  83. Lechartier C., Pollak-Cornillot M., Valantin S., de Vitry H. (1991). Revue Critique. Le processus psychanalytique. Rev. Franç. Psychanal., 2: 511-521.
  84. Lewin K. (1926). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
  85. Levi-Strauss C. (1983). Le regard éloigné. Paris: Plon.
  86. Meltzer D. (1967). The psycho-analytical process. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Limited.
  87. Merleau-Ponty M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
  88. Merleau-Ponty M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
  89. Michels R. (1994). Validation in the clinical process. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 1133-1140.
  90. Moran M.G. (1991). Chaos theory and psychoanalysis: the fluidistic nature of the mind. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 18: 211-221.
  91. Peirce C.S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  92. Penrose R. (1997). The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  93. Perron R. (1991). Des divers sens du terme modèle et de leurs usages possibles en psychanalyse. Rev. Franç. Psychanal., 55: 221-232.
  94. Planck M. (1935). Die Physik im Kampf um die Weltanschauung (conferenza, Lipsia).
  95. Poincaré H. (1908). Science et méthode. Paris: Flammarion.
  96. Polanyi M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.
  97. Polanyi M. (1958). La conoscenza personale. Milano: Rusconi, 1990.
  98. Popper K. ([1934], 1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
  99. Popper K. (1972). Conoscenza oggettiva. Un approccio evoluzionistico. Roma: Armando, 1975.
  100. Pragier G., Faure-Pragier S. (1990). Un siècle après l’Esquisse: nouvelles métaphores? Métaphores du nouveau? Rev. Franç. Psychanal., 54: 1395-1529.
  101. Quinodoz J.M. (1997). Transitions in psychic structures in the light of deterministic chaos theory. Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 699-718.
  102. Rapaport D., Gill M. (1959). The points of view and assumptions of metapsychology, Int. J. Psychoanal., 40: 153-162.
  103. Rosenstiehl P. (1979). Labirinto. Sub vocem. In: Enciclopedia: Labirinto-Memoria. Torino: Einaudi.
  104. Sandler J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64: 35-45.
  105. Sandler A.M., Sandler J. (1983). The “second censorship”, the “three box model” and some technical implications. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64: 413-425.
  106. Sauguet H. (1969). Introduction à une discussion sur le processus psychanalytic. Rev. Franç. Psychanal. 33: 913-927.
  107. Shimony A. (1997). Sur le mental, la mécanique quantique et la manifestation des potentialités. In: The Large, the Small and the Human Mind, de R. Penrose.
  108. Smith H.F. (2002). Panel report on “Creating the psychoanalytical process”. Int. J. Psychoanal., 83: 211-227., DOI: 10.1516/R981-0FMJ-4NHX-90DE
  109. Spruiell V. (1993). Deterministic chaos and the sciences of complexity: psychoanalysis in the midst of a general scientific revolution. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 41: 3-44.
  110. Steiner J. (1993). Psychic Retreats. London and New York: Routledge.
  111. Tegmark M. (2003). Universi paralleli. Scientific American, 418: 54-65.
  112. Vaihinger H. (1922). Die Philosophie des Als Ob. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
  113. Vygotskij L.S. (1934). Pensiero e linguaggio. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1990.
  114. Weinshel E. (1984). Some observations on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 53: 63-92.
  115. Weinshel E. (1990). Further observations on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 59: 629-649.
  116. Winnicott D.W. (1971). Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications.
  117. Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Jorge Canestri, in "PSICOANALISI" 1/2021, pp. 9-56, DOI:10.3280/PSI2021-001002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche