Comparison study of agricultural insurance government subsidy and farmers’ self-subsistent premium in Indonesia

Titolo Rivista Economia agro-alimentare
Autori/Curatori Muhammad Yasir Yusuf, Rahmat Fadhil, T. Saiful Bahri, Hafiizh Maulana
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 24 P. 1-24 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12184
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Agricultural Insurance as an embodiment of farmer protection and empowerment is carried out with The Rice Farming Business Insurance (AUTP) facility with an insurance premium scheme by the Government of 80% and 20% by farmers. This study aims to simulate the AUTP premium based on government’s subsidy and farmers’ self-subsistent premium. The simulation test used panel data estimates in Indonesia Province during 2016-2019. The AUTP premium simulation was identified through the Moderating Regression Analysis (MRA) approach, with the moderate variables being government subsidies and farmers’ self-subsistent premium. The Government's premium subsidy policy became a pure moderator that significantly increased the AUTP land area by 0.057%. Meanwhile, the coefficient of the farmers’ self-subsistent premium variable has a negative and significant effect on the realization of AUTP in Indonesia. The results of the policy simulation emphasize the importance of the government's role in encouraging the increase in the realization of AUTP through subsidizing premium assistance to farmers. The implication of this simulation of the MRA model is that the response and participation rate of the farmers’ premium payments independently is not followed by an increase in the realization of AUTP in Indonesia. The policy implications in the simulation of the two equation models conclude the importance of managing subsidized farmer premium payments and self-subsistent schemes based on insured land and farmer insurance policy. Agricultural insurance policy needs to adopt risk management tools, diversify agricultural insurance programs, and calculate the willingness to pay agricultural insurance premiums appropriately.

Keywords:; Agricultural insurance; premium; government’s subsidy; farmers; moderating regression analysis

  1. Ambarawati, G.A.A., Wijaya, M.A.M. & Budiasa, W. (2018). Risk Mitigation for Rice Production Through Agricultural Insurance: Farmers’ Perspectives. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 15(2), 128-135, DOI: 10.17358/jma.15.2.129.
  2. Baltagi, Badi H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
  3. Bielza Diaz-Caneja, M., Conte, C.G., Gallego Pinila, F.J., Stroblmair, J., Catenaro R. & Dittmann C. (2009). Risk Management and Agricultural Insurance Schemes in Europe, JRC European Comission, -- available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/downloads/jrc_reference_ report_2009_09_agri_ins.pdf.
  4. Bozzola, M., Massetti, E., Mendelsohn, R. & Capitanio, F. (2018). A Ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on Italian agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45(1), 57-79, DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbx023.
  5. Budiasa, I.W., Maya Temaja, I.G.R, Ustriayana, I.N.G., Nuarsa, I.W. & Wijaya, I.G.B. (2020). The Willingness Of Farmers To Pay Insurance Premiums For Sustainable Rice Farming In Bali. J. ISSAAS, 26(1), 63-72.
  6. Chavas, J.P., Di Falco, S., Adinolfi, F. & Capitanio, F. (2019). Weather Effects and their Long-Term Impact on the Distribution of Agricultural Yields: Evidence from Italy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(1), 29-51, DOI: 10.1093/erae/jby019.
  7. Di Falco, S., Adinolfi, F., Bozzola, M. & Capitanio, F. (2014). Crop Insurance as a Strategy for Adapting to Climate Change. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(2), 485-504, DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12053.
  8. [DJpsp] Direktorat Jenderal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian. (2015). Laporan Tahunan 2016-2019 (2016-2019 Annual Report). Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Analisis Kementerian Pertanian RI.
  9. [DJpsp] Direktorat Jenderal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian. (2017). Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Pembiayaan 2017 (Directorate of Financing Performance Report 2017). Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Analisis Kementerian Pertanian RI.
  10. [DJpsp] Direktorat Jendral Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian. 2020. Pedoman Bantuan Premi Asuransi Usahatani Padi (Rice Farm Insurance Premium Assistance Guidelines). Jakarta (ID). Direktorat Jendral Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian.
  11. Direktorat Pembiayaan. (2016). Rencana Strategis Direktorat Pembiayaan Pertanian Tahun 2015-2019 (Strategic Plan of the Directorate of Agricultural Financing for 2015-2019). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembiayaan Pertanian Direktorat Jendetal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian.
  12. Ghozali. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square PLS ed. 4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  13. Jayanto, T. (2018). Permodelan Premi Asuransi Mikro Keluarga Tani Berdasrarkan Pendekatan Portofolio dan Extreme Value Theory [Tesis] (Modeling of Farmers’ Microinsurance Premiums Based on a Portfolio Approach and Extreme Value Theory [Thesis]). Departemen Manajamen Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor (ID).
  14. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2019). Statistik Iklim, Organisme Penganggu Tanaman dan Dampak Perubahan Iklim 2016-2019 (Climate Statistics, Plant Pests and Impacts of Climate Change 2016-2019). Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Sektetariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian.
  15. Mahul, O. & Stutley, C.J. (2010). Goverment Support to Agricultural Insurance Challenges and Options for Developing Countries. Washington DC: World Bank. -- Available at: http://publications worldbank.org.
  16. Mitu, N.E. (2007). Agricultural Insurance in Romania: Present and Future Aspect. Munich Personal RePec Archive (MPRA), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 198206. -- Available online at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10773/.
  17. Muliadi & Amri, K. (2019). Infrastruktur Jalan, Belanja Modal dan Kesempatan Kerja: Bukti Data Panel Kabupaten/Kota di Aceh. (Road Infrastructure, Capital Expenditures and Employment Opportunities: Evidence of District/City Panel Data in Aceh). Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains, 4(2), 334-341, DOI: 10.33087/jmas.v4i2.115.
  18. Mustika, M., Fariyanti, A. & Tinaprilla, N. (2019). Analisi Sikap dan Kepuasan Petani terhadap Atribut Usahtani Padi di Kabupaten Kerawang Jawa Barat (Analysis of Farmers’ Attitudes and Satisfaction with Rice Attributes in Kerawang District, West Java. Agribusiness Forum). Forum Agribisnis, 9(2), 200-2014, DOI: 10.29244/fagb.9.2.200-214.
  19. Mutaqin, A.K. (2016). Kinerja Metode Perhitungan Premi Produk Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi di Indonesia (Performance of Calculation Method of Premiums for Rice Farmers Business Insurance Products in Indonesia. Statistika, 16(1), 41-45, DOI: 10.29313/jstat.v16i1.2279.
  20. Mutaqin, A.K., Kudul, A. & Karyana, Y. (2016). Metode Parametrik untuk Menghitung Premi Program Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi di Indonesia (Parametric Methods for Calculating Premiums for Paddy Farmer Business Insurance Programs in Indonesia). Ethos, 4(2), 318-326, DOI: 10.29313/ethos.v0i0.1656.
  21. Mutaqin, D.J. & Usami, K. (2019). Smallholder Farmers’ willingness to pay for agircultural production cost insurance in rural west java, Indonesia: A Contingent Valuation Method (cvm) Approach. Risk, 7(69), 1-18, DOI: 10.3390/risks7020069.
  22. Nahrowi, D. Nachrowi & Usman, Hardius. (2006). Pendekatan Populer daan Praktis Ekonometrika Untuk Analisis Ekonomi dan Keuangan. (Popular and practical approaches to econometrics for economic and financial analysis). Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi.
  23. [OJK] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2019). Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi; Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi; Asuransi Perikanan Pembudidaya Ikan Kecil; Asuransi Nelayan (Paddy Farm Business Insurance; Cattle Business Insurance; Small Fish Farmer Fisheries Insurance; Fisherman Insurance). Jakarta (ID).
  24. Pasaribu, M.S., Agung, I.S., Agustin, N.K., Lokollo, E.M., Tarigan, H., Supriatna, Y. (2010). Pengembangan Asuransi Usahatani Padi untuk Menanggulangi Risiko Kerugian 75% Akibat Banjir, Kekeringan, dan Hama Penyakit (Research Proposal: Development of Rice Farming Insurance to Cope with the Risk of 75% Loss Due to Flooding, Drought, and Disease Pests). Bogor (ID): Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian.
  25. Santeramo, F.G., Goodwin, B.K., Adinolfi, F. & Capitanio, F. (2016). Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Program. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(3), 639-657, DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12155.
  26. Shadbolt, N.M., Olubode-Awasola, F., Grad, D. & Dooley, E. 2010. Risk - an Opportunity or Threat for Enterpreneurial Farmer in Global Food Market?. Internasional Food and Agribusnisse Management Review, 13(4), 1-21, DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.96335.
  27. Siswandi, B. & Farida, S. (2016). Respon Petani terhadap Program Pemerintah Mengenai Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi (autp) (Farmers Response to Government Programs Regarding Rice Farmer Business Insurance (AUTP)). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Pertanian, 169-177, -- available at: https://fp.ub.ac.id/semnas/Paper/29_asuransi_padi-bambang_siswadi_(169-177).pdf.
  28. Surning, N., Ambarawati, A.A. & Ustriyana N.G. (2018). Willingness To Pay Petani terhadap Pelaksanaan Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi (AUTP) (Studi Kasus Subak Cepik Desa Tajen Kecamatan Penebel Kabupaten Tabanan) (Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Implementing Rice Farming Business Insurance (autp) (Case Study of Subak Cepik, Tajen Village, Penebel District, Tabanan Regency)). Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata, 7(3), 364-373, DOI: 10.24843/JAA.2018.v07.i03.p05.
  29. Wenner, M., & Diego, A. (2003). Agricultural Insurance in Latin America: Where Are We? askmi, Asian Knowledge Centre for Mutual Insurance, -- available at: www.findevgateway.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/mfg-en-case- studyrisk-management-pricing-insurance-guarantees-agricultural-insurance-in- latinamerica-where-are-we-2003_0.pdf.
  30. World Bank (2010). Agricultural Insurance in Latin America, Developing The Market (English). Report No. 61963-lac. Washington DC: World Bank, -- Available online at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/FINANCIALSECTOR/Resources/Agricultural_insurance_in_LAC_web_FINAL.pdf.
  31. Yanuarti, R., Aji, J.M.M. & Rondhi, M. (2019). Risk aversion level influence on farmers’ decision to participate in crop insurance: A review. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 65(10), 481-489, DOI: 10.17221/93/2019-agricecon.

  • Precaution Strategy of Moral Hazard Practice in Agricultural Insurance in Indonesia: An Approach of Soft Systems Methodology Rahmat Fadhil, Muhammad Yasir Yusuf, T. Saiful Bahri, Hafiizh Maulana, Fakhrurrazi Fakhrurrazi, in Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales /2021 pp.79
    DOI: 10.7201/earn.2021.02.04
  • Prohibition Policies and Environmental Cognition in Disaster-Prone Zones: A Study of Post-Earthquake Agricultural Land Reclamation Harifuddin Thahir, in Journal of Law and Sustainable Development /2023 pp.e436
    DOI: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.436
  • Sistem Pengembangan Asuransi Usaha Ternak Sapi/Kerbau di Provinsi Aceh Rahmat Fadhil, Zuraida Hanum, Muhammad Yunus, in Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia /2021 pp.569
    DOI: 10.18343/jipi.26.4.569

Muhammad Yasir Yusuf, Rahmat Fadhil, T. Saiful Bahri, Hafiizh Maulana, Comparison study of agricultural insurance government subsidy and farmers’ self-subsistent premium in Indonesia in "Economia agro-alimentare" 2/2021, pp 1-24, DOI: 10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12184