Come organizzare le comunità energetiche? Un’ ipotesi di prospettiva metodologica osservando due casi studio i

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA
Autori/Curatori Luca Tricarico, Andrea Billi
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/3 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 33 P. 105-137 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rgioa3-2021oa12536
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

La diffusione di iniziative comunitarie nell’ambito della produzione energetica sollevano molti interrogativi che richiedono nuove interpretazioni per l’analisi di tali processi. Tra queste, le Imprese di Comunità Energetiche rappresentano tipologie di organizzazioni specifiche, basate su piena proprietà collettiva e su schemi di investimento e collaborazione tra stakeholder locali in contesti territoriali definiti. Attraverso l’indagine di due casi di studio italiani, il presente articolo esamina l’operato di project manager, comunità ed altri stakeholder locali nelle diverse fasi del processo di coinvolgimento nello sviluppo delle iniziative. L’obiettivo principale è identificare una prospettiva metodologica con cui è possibile analizzare i processi di sviluppo locale realizzati da queste iniziative in una logica multi-stakeholder, confrontate con una survey sul “valore locale aggiunto” percepito dalla comunità di investitori nel progetto. Lo studio conclude con l’identificazione di alcune condizioni necessarie per realizzare il coinvolgimento della comunità locali in queste iniziative, delineando possibili competenze e strategie sperimentabiliall’interno del settore emergente delle Comunità Energetiche.;

Keywords:comunità energetiche, imprenditorialità comunitaria, energia distribuita, innovazione sociale, coinvolgimento comunitario

  1. Turcu C., Rydin Y. and Pilkey B. (2014). Energy in the locality: a case for local understanding and action. Local Environment, 19, 5: 469-478. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2014.921388
  2. Adesanya A.A., Sidortsov R.V. and Schelly C. (2020). Act locally, transition globally: Grassroots resilience, local politics, and five municipalities in the United States with 100% renewable electricity. Energy Research & Social Science, 67: 101579. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101579
  3. Alanne K., Saari A. (2006). Distributed energy generation and sustainable development. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 10, 6: 539-558. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.11.004
  4. Allen I.E. and Seaman C.A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40, 7: 64-65.
  5. Azarova V., Cohen J., Friedl C. and Reichl J. (2019). Designing local renewable energy communities to increase social acceptance: Evidence from a choice experiment in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland. Energy Policy, 132: 1176-1183. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.067
  6. Bailey N. (2012). The role, organisation and contribution of community enterprise to urban regeneration policy in the UK. Progress in Planning, 77, 1: 1-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.11.001
  7. Bauwens, T. (2019). Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders. Energy Policy, 129: 841-852. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.067
  8. Id., Gotchev B. and Holstenkamp L. (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13: 136-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016
  9. Id., Huybrechts B. and Dufays F. (2020). Understanding the diverse scaling strategies of social enterprises as hybrid organizations: The case of renewable energy cooperatives. Organization & Environment, 33, 2:195-219. DOI: 10.1177/1086026619837126
  10. Bell, D. Gray T. and Haggett C. (2005). The ‘social gap’ in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environmental politics, 14, 4: 460-477. DOI: 10.1080/09644010500175833
  11. Biresselioglu M.E., Demir M.H., Kaplan M.D. and Solak B. (2020). Individuals, collectives, and energy transition: analysing the motivators and barriers of European decarbonisation. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101493. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101493
  12. Bomberg E. and McEwen N. (2012). Mobilizing community energy. Energy policy, 51: 435-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.045
  13. Brondi S., Armenti A., Cottone P., Mazzara B.M., Sarrica M. (2014). Parliamentary and press discourses on sustainable energy in Italy: no more hard paths, not yet soft paths, Energy Research and Social Science, 2: 38-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.011
  14. Broughel A.E. and Hampl N. (2018). Community financing of renewable energy projects in Austria and Switzerland: Profiles of potential investors. Energy Policy, 123, 722-736. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.054
  15. Brummer V. (2018). Of expertise, social capital, and democracy: Assessing the organizational governance and decision-making in German Renewable Energy Cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 111-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.039
  16. Brunori G., Rossi, A. and Malandrin V. (2011). Co-producing transition: Innovation processes in farms adhering to solidarity-based purchase groups (GAS) in Tuscany, Italy. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and food, 18, 1: 28-53. DOI: 10.48416/ijsaf.v18i1.257
  17. Chirulli P. e Iaione C., a cura di (2019). La Co-Città. Diritto urbano e politiche pubbliche per la rigenerazione urbana l’innovazione sociale, l’economia collaborativa e i beni comuni. Napoli: Jovene.
  18. Contractor F.J. (2000). Valuing corporate knowledge and intangible assets: some general principles. Knowledge and Process anagement, 7, 4: 242. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1441(200010/12)7:43.3.CO;2-T
  19. Costa E. and Pesci C. (2016). Social impact measurement: why do stakeholders matter? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7, 1: 99-124. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2014-0092
  20. Covenant of Mayor (2012). Covenant of Mayor Statute. Disponibile a: http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/IMG/pdf/covenantofmayors_text_en.pdf
  21. Doci G. and Vasileiadou E. (2015). “Let’s do it ourselves” Individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49: 41-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051
  22. Du Gay P. (1997). Production of culture/cultures of production. Londra: Sage.
  23. Floroni A. (2013). Adotta un pannello fotovoltaico: cosa fare in questi anni di crisi. Strategie Amministrative: Dossier Smart City, Marzo 2015: 14-15. Disponibile a: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4idSWpasY-JcHAxN0ZQLTNJTVU/edit
  24. Freeman R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman: Boston.
  25. Gardberg N.A. and Fombrun C.J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of management Review, 31, 2: 329-346. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2006.20208684
  26. Garotta S. (2013). Democrazia energetica: come adottare un pannello fotovoltaico. Qualenergia.it. Disponibile a: www.qualenergia.it/articoli/20130411-democraziaenergetica-come-adottare-un-pannello-fotovoltaico
  27. Hall S., Foxon T.J. and Bolton R. (2016). Financing the civic energy sector: How financial institutions affect ownership models in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 12: 5-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.004
  28. Hoffman S.M. and High-Pippert A. (2010). From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program. Energy Policy, 38, 12: 7567-7574. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.054
  29. Huybrechts B. and Mertens S. (2014). The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85, 2: 193-212. DOI: 10.1111/apce.12038
  30. Iarossi G. (2006). The power of survey design: A user’s guide for managing surveys, interpreting results, and influencing respondents. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  31. Kuzemko C., Lockwood M., Mitchell C. and Hoggett R. (2016). Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Research & Social Science, 12: 96-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.022
  32. Lindenberg S. and Steg L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social issues, 63, 1, 117-137. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x
  33. Linnerud K., Toney P., Simonsen M. and Holden E. (2019). Does change in ownership affect community attitudes toward renewable energy projects? Evidence of a status quo bias. Energy Policy, 131: 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.039
  34. Magnani N. and Osti G. (2015). Does civil society matter? Challenges and strategies of grassroots initiatives in Italy’s energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 13: 148-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.012
  35. Moroni S. and Tricarico L. (2018). Distributed energy production in a polycentric scenario: policy reforms and community management. Journal of environmental planning and management, 61, 11: 1973-1993. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1379957
  36. Id., Alberti V., Antoniucci V. and Bisello A. (2019). Energy communities in the transition to a low-carbon future: A taxonomical approach and some policy dilemmas. Journal of environmental management, 236: 45-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.095
  37. Oteman M., Wiering M. and Helderman J.K. (2014). The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: a comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Energy, sustainability and society, 4,1: 1-17. DOI: 10.1186/2192-0567-4-11
  38. Peredo A.M. and Chrisman J.J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31, 2: 309-328. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2006.20208683
  39. Pueyo A. and Maestre M. (2019). Linking energy access, gender and poverty: A review of the literature on productive uses of energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 53: 170-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.019
  40. Schreuer A. (2012). Energy Cooperatives and Local Ownership in the Field of Renewable Energy Technologies, Country Cases Austria and Germany. Vienna: Research Institute for Co-operation and Co-operatives. Disponibile a: https://epub.wu.ac.at/id/eprint/3831
  41. Seyfang G., Park J.J. and Smith A. (2013). A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61: 977-989. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030
  42. Soeiro S. and Dias M.F. (2020). Renewable energy community and the European energy market: main motivations. Heliyon, 6,7, e04511. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04511
  43. Spinicci F. (2011). Le cooperative di utenza in Italia e in Europa. Euricse Research Report n. 2/2011. Disponibile a: http://socialcapitalgateway.eu/sites/euricse.eu/files/rr_04_spinicci.pdf
  44. Tricarico L. (2015). Energia come community asset e orizzonte di sviluppo per le imprese di comunità. Impresa Sociale, 5: 53-64.
  45. Id. (2016). Imprese di comunità come fattore territoriale: riflessioni a partire dal contesto italiano. CRIOS, 11: 35-50.
  46. Id. (2017). Community action: value or instrument? an ethics and planning critical review. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41,3: 221-233. DOI: 10.3846/20297955.2017.1355278
  47. Id. (2018). Community Energy Enterprises in the Distributed Energy Geography. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 18: 81-94. DOI: 10.5278/ijsepm.2018.18.6
  48. Id. (2021). Is community earning enough? Reflections on engagement processes and drivers in two Italian energy communities. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101899. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101899
  49. Id., Jones Z.M. and Daldanise G. (2020). Platform Spaces: When culture and the arts intersect territorial development and social innovation, a view from the Italian context. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2020.1808007
  50. Van Veelen B., Pinker A., Tingey M., Aiken G.T. and Eadson W. (2019). What can energy research bring to social science? Reflections on 5 years of Energy Research & Social Science and beyond. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101240. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101240
  51. Walker B.J., Wiersma B. and Bailey E. (2014). Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: an experimental study in England. Energy Research & Social Science, 3: 46-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003
  52. Walker G. (2008). What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? Energy Policy, 36,12: 4401-4405. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.032
  53. Id., Devine-Wright P. (2008). Community renewable energy: what should it mean? Energy Policy; 36(2): 497-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019
  54. Id., Id., Hunter S., High H. and Evans B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38,6: 2655-2663. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055

  • Eco-Welfare and the Energy Transition Lorenzo De Vidovich, pp.105 (ISBN:978-3-031-55027-0)

Luca Tricarico, Andrea Billi, Come organizzare le comunità energetiche? Un’ ipotesi di prospettiva metodologica osservando due casi studio i in "RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA" 3/2021, pp 105-137, DOI: 10.3280/rgioa3-2021oa12536