Click here to download

Anthropology. Reflections on a trans-cultural and trans-disciplinary knowledge.
Journal Title: EDUCAZIONE SENTIMENTALE 
Author/s: Francesco Remotti 
Year:  2021 Issue: 35 Language: Italian 
Pages:  7 Pg. 72-78 FullText PDF:  165 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EDS2021-035005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Transiting from one disciplinary field to another is presented as something ines-capable. Good anthropology, which has been able to carry out operations of crossing from one culture to another, in the same way becomes aware of carrying out trans operations from one discipline to another. When anthropology is good, it is not only the receptor of a multiplicity of disciplinary knowledge; it also has the capacity to produce a return effect on the disciplines it is forced to use, de-termining a trans-disciplinary dialogue and a transcultural dialogue. The oscil-lation between "individuo" and "dividuo" leads to the intermediate space of "condividuo", proposed as a trans-disciplinary notion, a place of encounter at the same time inter-disciplinary and inter-cultural.
Keywords: disciplinary scope, trans-culture, trans-discipline, multiple disciplinary knowledge, anthropology as a disciplinarily multiple receptor, anthropology producing feedback on adopted disciplines, individuo, dividuo, condividuo

  1. Gagliasso E. (2009). La metafora di individuo in biologia. Paradigmi. Rivista di critica filosofica, XXVII(1): 137-146., DOI: 10.3280/PARA2009-001010
  2. Gilbert S.F., Sapp J., Tauber A.I. (2012). A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, LXXXVII(4): 325-341., DOI: 10.1086/668166
  3. Kuhn T. (1969). La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche. Torino: Einaudi. Ediz. originale: The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  4. Margulis L. (1998). Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. New York: Basic Books.
  5. Mauss M. (2002). Il saggio sul dono. Torino: Einaudi (ed. or. 1924-1925).
  6. Monti M., Redi C.A. (2018). Noi siamo l’intestino. La Lettura (Corriere della Sera), 8 aprile, pp. 2-3.
  7. Monti M., Redi C.A., a cura di (2019). CON-dividuo. Cellule e genomi. Pavia: Collegio Ghislieri, Ibis.
  8. Remotti F., a cura di (1997). Le antropologie degli altri. Saggi di etno-antropologia. Torino: Paravia-Scriptorium.
  9. Remotti F. (2013). L’imperfezionamento in antropologia. In: W. Kaltenbacher, a cura di, Simposio Lévi-Strauss. Uno sguardo dall’oggi. Milano: Il Saggiatore, pp. 57-94.
  10. Remotti F. (2014). Per un’antropologia inattuale. Milano: Elèuthera.
  11. Remotti F. (2019). Somiglianze. Una via per la convivenza. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Francesco Remotti, Anthropology. Reflections on a trans-cultural and trans-disciplinary knowledge. in "EDUCAZIONE SENTIMENTALE" 35/2021, pp. 72-78, DOI:10.3280/EDS2021-035005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content