Understanding new media and participatory culture: Well-being or ill-being?

Titolo Rivista: RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori: Mariusz Baranowski
Anno di pubblicazione: 2021 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 20 P. 351-370 Dimensione file: 224 KB
DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-002023
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This article deals with participatory culture through the prism of new media, identi-fied as standard with the development of information and communication tech-nologies (ICT) and information technology (IT). These technologies (co-)constitute the foundation of the network society, also referred to as the information society, and influence the economy and - undoubtedly - the cultural sphere. The main re-search problem posed in this article concerns reflections on participation patterns mediated by the new media in the context of psychological well-being and its op-posite the state of ill-being. This task requires a redefinition of the notions of par-ticipatory culture and new media and the adoption of specific determinants of well-being and ill-being, which - unlike in the case of the psychology of happiness - is concretised through sociologically understood categories of redistribution and recognition.

  1. Ando’ S. (2015). The new digital economy? If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change. Media – Kultura – Komunikacja Społeczna, 11(3): 23-36.
  2. Archer M.S. (2001). Being Human: the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Baker S.C., Wentz R.K. and Woods M.M. (2009). Using Virtual Worlds in Education: Second Life® as an Educational Tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1): 59-64. DOI: 10.1080/00986280802529079
  4. Baranowski M. (2017). Welfare sociology in our times. How social, political, and economic uncertainties shape contemporary societies. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 66(4): 9-26.
  5. Baranowski M. (2019a). The Struggle for Social Welfare: Towards An Emerging Welfare Sociology. Society Register, 3(2): 7-19.
  6. Baranowski M. (2019b). Sociology of Knowledge in Times Determined by Knowledge. Society Register, 3(1): 7-22.
  7. Baranowski M. (2021). The Sharing Economy: Social Welfare in a Technologically Networked Economy. Bulletin of Science, technology & Society, 41(1): 20-30. DOI: 10.1177/02704676211010723
  8. Baranowski M. and Mroczkowska D. (2021). Algorithmic Automation of Leisure from a Sustainable Development Perspective. In: Lubowiecki-Vikuk A. et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Sustainable Development and Leisure Services (pp. 21-38). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59820-4_2
  9. Bedynski W., Godz J. and Łukowski W. (2021). Urban social movements in a small town: The case of ‘Aktywne Giżycko.’. Przegląd Krytyczny, 3(1): 79-98.
  10. Bendyk E. (2009). Fałszywa alternatywa. In Castells M. & Himanen P. (Eds.). The Information Society and the Welfare State: The Finnish Model (pp. 5-15). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
  11. Benkler Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale: Yale University Press.
  12. Blanke T. and Pybus J. (2020). The Material Conditions of Platform: Monopolization Through Decentralization. Social Media + Society, 6(4). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120971632
  13. Błachnio A. (2007). Review of research on the social and psychological effects of the internet on well-being and interpersonal relationships of users. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 3-4(5): 225-233.
  14. Boellstorff T. (2008). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  15. Brynjolfsson E. and McAfee A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  16. Castells M. (2006). Emergence des <médias de masse individuels>. Le Monde diplomatique. -- Retrieved April 7, 2021 from https://www.monde-diplomatique. fr/2006/08/CASTELLS/13744.
  17. Castells M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Malden: Blackwell.
  18. Castells M. and Himanen P. (2002). The Information Society and the Welfare State: The Finnish Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Chang H-J. (2010). 23 Things They Don’t Tell You about Capitalism. London: Allen Lane.
  20. Chau C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions for Youth Development 128: 65-74.
  21. Chenou J.M. (2011). Is Internet governance a democratic process? Multistakeholderism and transnational elites. In ECPR general conference, 25-27.
  22. Chollet M. (2006). La tyrannie de la réalité. Paris: Gallimard.
  23. Cinnamon J. (2019). Data inequalities and why they matter for development. Information Technology for Development, 26(2): 214-233.
  24. Crary J. (2013). 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso.
  25. Crosbie V. (1998). What is New Media?. -- Retrieved April 5, 2017 -- from http://www.sociology.org.uk/as4mm3a.pdf.
  26. Dowbor L. (2021). Whatever happened to Brazil?. Society Register, 5(3): 17-36.
  27. Diener E. and Ryan K. (2009). Subjective Well-Being: A General Overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4): 391-406.
  28. Dziadzia B. (2012). On the dilemmas of the so-called participation culture. Media i Społeczeństwo, 2: 101-113.
  29. Eagleton T. (2000). The Idea of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  30. Fraser N. (2003). Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. In Fraser N. & Honneth A. (Eds.). Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. Transl. Joel Golb et al. (pp. 7-109). London: Verso.
  31. Fraser N. and Honneth A. (2003). Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. Transl. Joel Golb et al. London: Verso.
  32. Frenken K. and Schor J. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23: 3-10.
  33. Fuchs C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London: SAGE.
  34. Ghareeb E. (2000). New Media and the Information Revolution in the Arab World: An Assessment. Middle East Journal, 54(3): 395-418.
  35. Gilmore E. (2012). Democratisation and New Media. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 23: 5-12. DOI: 10.3318/ISIA.2012.23.5
  36. Hardt M. and Negri A. (2003). Empire. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  37. Hardt M. and Negri A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  38. Horkheimer M. and Adorno T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Transl. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  39. Illouz E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Polity Press (electronic format).
  40. Jemielniak D. and Przegalinska A. (2020). Collaborative Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  41. Jenkins H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
  42. John N.A. (2017). The Age of Sharing. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  43. Juza M. (2011). Perspektywy rozwoju kultury popularnej w obliczu nowych mediów. In Ogonowska A. (Ed.). Oblicza nowych mediów (pp. 11-30). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza.
  44. Lévy P. (1997). Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Cambridge, Mass: Perseus Books.
  45. Litt E., Zhao S., Kraut R. and Burke M. (2020). What Are Meaningful Social Interactions in Today’s Media Landscape? A Cross-Cultural Survey. Social Media + Society, 6(3). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120942888
  46. Manovich L. (2003). New Media from Borges to HTML. In Wardrip-Fruin N. and Montfort N. (Eds.). The New Media Reader (pp. 13-25). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
  47. Mansell R. and Steinmueller W.E. (2010). British Telecommunications plc (‘BT’) and TalkTalk Telecom Group Limited v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (‘BIS’) In the matter of an intended claim. LSE Enterprise, 1-59, -- Retrieved April 7, 2021 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/36152/1/British_Telecommunications_plc_%28author_version%29.pdf.
  48. Marques A.M., Krejci R., Siqueira S.W.M., Pimentel M. and Braz M.H.L.B. (2013). Structuring the discourse on social networks for learning: Case studies on blogs and microblogs. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2): 395-400.
  49. McLuhan M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
  50. Mierzejewska B. and Aluchna M. (2007). Attention economy – koncepcja zarządzania uwagą (część I). E-mentor, 2(19), n.p. -- Retrieved April 7, 2021 from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/19/id/404.
  51. Mulgan G. (1991). Communication and Control: Networks and the New Economies of Communication. New York: Guilford Press.
  52. Nichols B. (2003). The Work of Culture in the Age of Cybernetic Systems. In Wardrip-Fruin N. and Montfort N. (Eds.). The New Media Reader (pp. 625-641). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
  53. Panico C. (2020). Right to the city and right to the non-city: Neo-extractivism and social movements in southern Europe. Society Register, 4(4): 151-166.
  54. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  55. Rheingold H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. New York: Perseus Books.
  56. Porlezza C. (2019). From Participatory Culture to Participatory Fatigue: The Problem with the Public. Social Media + Society, 5(3): 1-4.
  57. Rist G. (2011). The Delusions of Economics: The Misguided Certainties of a Hazardous Science. London: Zed Books.
  58. Skeels M.M. and Grudin J. (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. GROUP ‘09: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International conference on Supporting group work. May, 95-104. DOI: 10.1145/1531674.1531689
  59. Stunża G.D. (2017). Education Beta Version. Generation Z and Generation Alfa and the Competences of Participate in Culture. Kultura Popularna, 1(50): 86-94.
  60. Surowiecki J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. Santa Ana: Anchor Books.
  61. The Economist (2017). Are digital distractions harming labour productivity?, Dec 7th. -- Retrieved April 7, 2021 from https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/12/07/are-digital-distractions-harming-labour-productivity.
  62. Tittenbrun J. (2017). Concepts of Capital. The Commodification of Social Life. London: Routledge.
  63. Tocqueville A. De. (2010). Democracy in America. Historical-Critical Edition of De la démocratie en Amérique. Transl. James T. Schleifer. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  64. Tombleson B. and Wolf K. (2017). Rethinking the circuit of culture: How participatory culture has transformed cross-cultural communication. Public Relations Review, 43(1): 14-25.
  65. Urry J. (2000). Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
  66. Usher N. and Ng Y.M.M. (2020). Sharing Knowledge and ‘Microbubbles’: Epistemic Communities and Insularity in US Political Journalism. Social Media + Society, 6(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120926639
  67. Van Laer J. and Van Aelst P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8): 1146-1171.
  68. Willis S. and Tranter B. (2006). Beyond the ‘digital divide’ Internet diffusion and inequality in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 42(1): 43-59.
  69. Zaleski A. (2016). How Bots, Twitter, and Hackers Pushed Trump to the Finish Line. Wired October 11. -- Retrieved April 7, 2021 from https://www.wired.com/ 2016/11/how-bots-twitter-and-hackers-pushed-trump-to-the-finish-line/.
  70. Zuboff S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Profile Books.

Mariusz Baranowski, Understanding new media and participatory culture: Well-being or ill-being? in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2021, pp 351-370, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-002023