Click here to download

Scientific Productivity in the Italian Academia from a Gender Perspective
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Monia Anzivino, Annalisa Dordoni 
Year:  2022 Issue: 162 Language: Italian 
Pages:  23 Pg. 141-163 FullText PDF:  233 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2022-162007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The article investigates the gender gap in scientific productivity in Italy, using data from a national survey carried out between 2015 and 2016. It allows us to observe the relationship between gender and productivity on a large representative sample of structured academic staff (N = 5,123) in all disciplinary areas and on different types of publications, i.e. monographs, curatorships of edited volumes, essays and articles. The results show that the gender productivity gap is articulated differently by field and type of product: it is more present in disciplines with a greater presence of women, it is more widespread for articles and essays and is conversely limited to the humanities for monographs and curatorships. Some possible interpretations of these results, which are partly unexpected, are discussed starting from the existing literature.
Keywords: Italian university, research products, scientific productivity, gender gap

  1. Squazzoni F., Bravo G., Farjam M., Marusic A., Mehmani B., Willis M., Birukou A., Dondio P., Grimaldo F. (2021). Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science Advances, 7(2): eabd0299.
  2. Stack S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8): 891-920.
  3. Steinþórsdóttir F.S., Einarsdóttir Þ., Pétursdóttir G.M., Himmelweit S. (2020). Gendered inequalities in competitive grant funding: an overlooked dimension of gendered power relations in academia. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2): 362-375., DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2019.166625
  4. Thomas R., Davies A. (2002). Gender and new public management: Reconstituting academic subjectivities. Gender, Work & Organization, 9(4): 372-397., DOI: 10.1111/1468-0432.0016
  5. Van Arensbergen P., van der Weijden I., van den Besselaar P. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3): 857-868.
  6. Van den Besselaar P., Sandström U. (2016). Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study. Scientometrics, 106: 143-162.
  7. Van den Besselaar P., Sandström U. (2017). Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact. PloS one, 12(8): e0183301.
  8. Van den Brink M., Benschop Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4): 507-524., DOI: 10.1177/135050841141429
  9. Van den Brink M., Benschop Y. (2012). Slaying the seven‐headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(1): 71-92.
  10. Van den Brink M., Benschop Y. (2014). Gender in academic networking: The role of gatekeepers in professorial recruitment. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3): 460-492.
  11. Weisshaar K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2): 529-560.
  12. Windsor L.C., Crawford K.F. (2020). Best Practices for Normalizing Parents in the Academy: Higher-and Lower-Order Processes and Women and Parents’ Success. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(2): 275-280., DOI: 10.1017/S104909651900193
  13. Winslow S. (2010). Gender inequality and time allocations among academic faculty. Gender & Society, 24(6): 769-793., DOI: 10.1177/089124321038672
  14. Zippel K. (2017). Women in global science: Advancing academic careers through international collaboration. Stanford: Stanford University Press., DOI: 10.1515/978150360150
  15. Abramo G., D’Angelo C.A., Caprasecca A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 3: 517-539.
  16. Abramo G., D’Angelo C.A., Di Costa F. (2018). The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification. Scientometrics, 2: 373-387.
  17. Addis E., Villa P. (2003). The Editorial boards of Italian economics journals: women, gender, and social networking. Feminist Economics, 1: 75-91., DOI: 10.1080/135457003200005706
  18. Agodi M.C., Picardi I. (2016). Il mentoring come progetto trasformativo della struttura di genere dell’accademia: il programma pilota di GENOVATE@UNINA. La Camera Blu, 15: 136-170., DOI: 10.6092/1827-9198/403
  19. Aiston S.J., Jung J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: An international comparison. Gender and Education, 3: 205-220., DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2015.102461
  20. Akbaritabar A., Casnici N., Squazzoni F. (2018). The conundrum of research productivity: A study on sociologists in Italy. Scientometrics, 3: 859-882.
  21. Baccini A., Barabesi L., Cioni M., Pisani C. (2014). Crossing the hurdle: the determinants of individual scientific performance. Scientometrics, 3: 2035-2062.
  22. Baxter J., Wright E.O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis a comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & society, 14(2): 275-294., DOI: 10.1177/08912430001400200
  23. Bosak J., Sczesny S. (2008). Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position. Sex roles, 9: 682-688.
  24. Bozzon R., Murgia A., Poggio B. (2016). Supporting early career researchers through Gender Action Plans. A design and methodological toolkit. Trento: University of Trento.
  25. Carreri A., Dordoni A. (2020). Academic and research work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a gender perspective. Italian Sociological Review, 10(3S).
  26. Closa C., Moury C., Novakova Z., Qvortrup M., Ribeiro B. (2020). Mind the (submission) gap: EPSR gender data and female authors publishing perceptions. European Political Science, 19: 428-442.
  27. Correll S.J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1): 93-113., DOI: 10.1177/00031224040690010
  28. D’Amico R., Vermigli P., Canetto S.S. (2011). Publication productivity and career advancement by female and male psychology faculty: The case of Italy. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3: 175-184.
  29. De Coster M., Zanoni P. (2019). Governing through accountability: Gendered moral selves and the (im)possibilities of resistance in the neoliberal university. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(4): 411-429.
  30. De Paola M., Ponzo M., Scoppa V. (2017). Gender differences in the propensity to apply for promotion: evidence from the Italian Scientific Qualification. Oxford Economic Papers, 4: 986-1009.
  31. De Paola M., Scoppa V. (2015). Gender discrimination and evaluators’ gender: evidence from Italian academia. Economica, 82: 162-188.
  32. European Commission (2019). SHE FIGURES 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  33. European Union (2021). Horizon Europe. Gender equality: a strengthened commitment in Horizon Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  34. Ferree M.M., Purkayastha B. (2000). Equality and cumulative disadvantage: Response to Baxter and Wright. Gender and Society, 14(6): 809-813., DOI: 10.1177/08912430001400600
  35. Fox C.W., Paine T. (2019). Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 9: 3599-3619.
  36. Fox M.F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 1: 131-150., DOI: 10.1177/030631270504663
  37. Gaiaschi C., Musumeci R. (2020). Just a Matter of Time? Women’s Career Advancement in Neo-Liberal Academia. An Analysis of Recruitment Trends in Italian Universities. Social Sciences, 9(9): 163.
  38. Guarino C.M., Borden V.M. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 6: 672-694.
  39. Helmer M., Schottdorf M., Neef A., Battaglia D. (2017). Gender bias in scholarly peer review. Elife, 6: e21718.
  40. Hunter L.A., Leahey E. (2010). Parenting and research productivity: New evidence and methods. Social Studies of Science, 3: 433-451., DOI: 10.1177/030631270935847
  41. Ivancheva M., Lynch K., Keating K. (2019). Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(4): 448-462.
  42. Kwiek M. (2018). International research collaboration and international research orientation: comparative findings about European academics. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(2): 136-160., DOI: 10.1177/102831531774708
  43. Ledin A., Bornmann L., Gannon F., Wallon G. (2007). A persistent problem. Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO reports, 8(11): 982-987.
  44. Lee S., Bozeman B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social studies of science, 5: 673-702., DOI: 10.1177/030631270505235
  45. Lynch K., Ivancheva M., O’Flynn M., Keating K., O’Connor M. (2020). The care ceiling in higher education. Irish Educational Studies, 2: 157-174., DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2020.173404
  46. Madison G., Fahlman P. (2020). Sex differences in the number of scientific publications and citations when attaining the rank of professor in Sweden. Studies in Higher Education, 1-22., DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.172353
  47. Mairesse J., Pezzoni M., Visentin F. (2019). Impact of family characteristics on the gender publication gap: evidence for physicists in France. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2: 204-220., DOI: 10.1080/03080188.2019.160388
  48. Mayer S.J., Rathmann J.M. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 3: 1663-1693.
  49. Minello A., Martucci S., Manzo L.K. (2021). The pandemic and the academic mothers: present hardships and future perspectives. European Societies, 23/sup1: 1-13., DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.180969
  50. MIUR (2021). Focus. Le carriere femminili in ambito accademico. Elaborazioni su banche dati MIUR, DGSIS – Ufficio VI Gestione patrimonio informativo e statistica.
  51. Monroe K., Chiu W. (2010). Gender Equality in the Academy: The Pipeline Problem. PS: Political Science & Politics, 2: 303-308., DOI: 10.1017/S104909651000017
  52. Morley L., Alexiadou N., Garaz S., González-Monteagudo J., Taba M. (2018). Internationalisation and migrant academics: the hidden narratives of mobility. Higher Education, 76(3): 537-554.
  53. Murgia A., Poggio B., a cura di (2019). Gender and precarious research careers: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge., DOI: 10.4324/978131520124
  54. Musumeci R., Solera C. (2013). Women’s and men’s career interruptions in Europe: the role of social policies. Observatoire de la société britannique, 14: 37-72.
  55. Pell A.N. (1996). Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia. Journal of Animal Science, 74(11): 2843-2848., DOI: 10.2527/1996.74112843
  56. Picardi I. (2020). Labirinti di cristallo: strutture di genere nell'accademia e nella ricerca. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  57. Picardi I., Agodi M.C. (2020). Gender perspective in mentoring relationships: a case study of GENOVATE@UNINA. In: Lawton Smith H., Henry C., Etzkowitz H., a cura di, Gender, Science and Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar., DOI: 10.4337/978178643897
  58. Poggio B. (2016). Networking and Partnership as Strategic Practices for Gender Studies in Academia: The Case of the University of Trento. Italian Political Science, 2: 15-18.
  59. Poggio B. (2018). Gender politics in academia in the neoliberal age. In: Messerschmidt J.W., Messner M.A., Connell R., a cura di, Gender reckonings: New social theory and research. New York: New York University Press., DOI: 10.18574/9781479866342-01
  60. Pozzi A., Sciannamblo M., Viteritti A. (2017). Trajectories of Women in Mathematics and Computer Science: Mobility, Positioning and Hybridization. Polis, 1: 73-96., DOI: 10.1424/8608
  61. Probert B. (2005). ‘I Just Couldn’t Fit It In’: Gender and Unequal Outcomes in Academic Careers. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(1): 50-72.
  62. Pyke J. (2013). Women, choice and promotion or why women are still a minority in the professoriate. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 4: 444-454., DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.81217
  63. Rafnsdóttir G.L., Heijstra T.M. (2013). Balancing work–family life in academia: The power of time. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(3): 283-296.
  64. Rees T. (2011). The gendered construction of scientific excellence. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2: 133-145., DOI: 10.1179/030801811X1301318196143
  65. Reuben E., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2014). How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12): 4403-4408.
  66. Risman B.J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & society, 18(4): 429-450., DOI: 10.1177/089124320426534
  67. Risman B.J., Davis G. (2013). From sex roles to gender structure. Current Sociology, 61(5-6): 733-755., DOI: 10.1177/001139211347931
  68. Sattari N., Sandefur R.L. (2019). Gender in academic STEM: A focus on men faculty. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(2): 158-179.
  69. Solera C., Musumeci R. (2017). The persisting glass ceiling in academia: a multidimensional cross-national perspective. Polis, 1: 17-44., DOI: 10.1424/8607

Monia Anzivino, Annalisa Dordoni, Scientific Productivity in the Italian Academia from a Gender Perspective in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 162/2022, pp. 141-163, DOI:10.3280/SL2022-162007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content