Religious and sacred art: Recent psychological perspectives

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Sara Valentina Schieppati, Cinzia Di Dio, Gabriella Gilli
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/1 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 12 P. 1-12 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rip2022oa13589
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The psychology of art has had an enormous development since the middle of the last century; however, no much work has been done in association with religious and sacred art. This paper aims to provide a brief history of the use of images in the three great monotheistic religions, i.e., Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.All three religions have been influenced by the commandment (Exodus, 20:4), which prohibits idolatry. Nevertheless, when it comes to the use of images with religious content, the commandment is interpreted differently by the three. If in Judaism and Islam the use of images is not particularly widespread and is bound to precise conditions, in Christianity a strong relationship with the visual arts has developed, at least until the Reformation. After this split, the use of images was only encouraged by the Catholic Church even though, with the Enlightenment, religious and sacred art suffered a decline even in Catholic culture.It was not until the twentieth and twenty-first centuries that the Catholic Church returned to support and encourage art in the religious context. It will then be necessary to distinguish between religious art and sacred art because they serve different functions. Precisely because it is a field in which deepening is possible, it could be very interesting for the psychology of art to study the perception of religious and sacred images, for example investigating constructs associated with the perception of vitality and aesthetic judgment.

The psychology of art has had an enormous development since the middle of the last century; however, no much work has been done in association with religious and sacred art. This paper aims to provide a brief history of the use of images in the three great monotheistic religions, i.e., Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.All three religions have been influenced by the commandment (Exodus, 20:4), which prohibits idolatry. Nevertheless, when it comes to the use of images with religious content, the commandment is interpreted differently by the three. If in Judaism and Islam the use of images is not particularly widespread and is bound to precise conditions, in Christianity a strong relationship with the visual arts has developed, at least until the Reformation. After this split, the use of images was only encouraged by the Catholic Church even though, with the Enlightenment, religious and sacred art suffered a decline even in Catholic culture.It was not until the twentieth and twenty-first centuries that the Catholic Church returned to support and encourage art in the religious context. It will then be necessary to distinguish between religious art and sacred art because they serve different functions. Precisely because it is a field in which deepening is possible, it could be very interesting for the psychology of art to study the perception of religious and sacred images, for example investigating constructs associated with the perception of vitality and aesthetic judgment.

Keywords:; psychology of art; religion; visual arts; sacred art

  1. Basak, R. (2017). The Muslim Artist’s Conflict: Figurative prohibition in Islam. DOI: 10.18844/prosoc.v3i5.1955.
  2. Burckhardt, T. (1990). Lʼarte sacra in Oriente e in Occidente. Rusconi Libri.
  3. Cavallotto, S. (2019, novembre). Santità “negata”. Argomenti contro il culto dei santi. La percezione sensoriale della santità. Ciclo di seminari del Dipartimento di Scienze Religiose dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italia.
  4. Dall’Asta (2016). Eclissi. Oltre il divorzio tra arte e Chiesa. Milano: Edizioni San Paolo.
  5. De Tommaso, W. S. (2018). Arte Sacra e Arte Religiosa. Imagem de culto e imagem de devoção. https://www.academia.edu/15548862/Arte_Sacra_e_Arte_Religiosa._Imagem_de_culto_e_imagem_de_devo%C3%A7%C3%A3o.
  6. Di Dio, C., Berchio, C., Massaro, D., Lombardi, E., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2018). Body Aesthetic Preference in Preschoolers and Attraction to Canons Violation: An Exploratory Study. Psychological Reports, 121(6), 1053-1071. DOI: 10.1177/0033294117744560.
  7. Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PloS one, 2(11), e1201. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001201.
  8. Di Dio, C., Massaro, D., Savazzi, F. A., Gallese, V., Garau, T., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2020). Beauty in life: an eye-tracking study on young adults’ aesthetic evaluation and vitality judgment of pictorial representations of sleeping and dead subjects . PsyCh Journal, 9(4), 458-471. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.285.
  9. Di Porto, A. (2018). Immagini vietate o permesse?. Arte ed ebraismo. https://www.academia.edu/36693551/Immagini_vietate_o_permesse_Alcuni_spunti_su_arte_ed_ebraismo.
  10. Freedberg, D., & Perini, G. (2013). Il potere delle immagini: il mondo delle figure: reazioni e emozioni del pubblico. Torino: Einaudi.
  11. Ganz, D. (2000). Tra paura e fascino: la funzione comunicativa delle immagini visive nel “Discorso” di Gabriele Paleotti. In: Casey, J. (Ed.): Imaging humanity/Immagini dell'umanità. Proceedings of a conference held Apr. 22-23, 1999 at the Pontificial Gregorian University in Rome, Italy, Lafayette, In. 2000, S. 57-6.
  12. Guardini, R. (1960). Imágen de culto e imágen de devoción; Sobre la esencia de la obra de arte. Ediciones Guadarrama.
  13. Guardini, R. (1998). L’opera d’arte. Brescia: Editrice Morcelliana.
  14. Hart, T. (2004). Protestantism and the Arts. The Blackwell Companion to Protestantism, 268. DOI: 10.1002/9780470999196.ch27.
  15. Mastandrea, S. (2015). Psicologia dellʼarte. Roma: Carocci editore.
  16. Papa, R., & Llovera, A. C. (2012). Discorsi sullʼarte sacra. Siena: Cantagalli Editore.
  17. Piaget, J. (1929). The Child’s Conception of the World. London: Routledge.
  18. Salviucci Insolera, L. (2016). Immagini e Arte Sacra nel Concilio di Trento. “Per istruire, ricordare, meditare, e trarne frutti”. Artemide, Roma.
  19. Soganci, I. O. (2006). The place of figurative representation in Islamic Art: a multi-dimensional attempt to question some unjust claims. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 24, 135.
  20. Vauchez, A. (2019, ottobre). Santità “localizzata”. L’importanza dei “luoghi” nell’evoluzione del culto cristiano dei santi. La percezione sensoriale della santità. Ciclo di seminari del Dipartimento di Scienze Religiose dell’Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italia.
  21. Verdon, T. (2012). Breve storia dellʼarte sacra cristiana. Brescia: Queriniana.
  22. Volponi, P., & Berti, L. (1968). Lʼopera completa di Masaccio (Vol. 24) Milano: Rizzoli.

  • Is Aesthetic Good? A Study on the Aesthetic and Vitality Judgment of Pictorial Representations of the Dead, Saints and Non-Saints Sara Valentina Schieppati, Cinzia Di Dio, Antonella Marchetti, Davide Massaro, Gabriella Maria Gilli, in Behavioral Sciences /2022 pp.507
    DOI: 10.3390/bs12120507

Sara Valentina Schieppati, Cinzia Di Dio, Gabriella Gilli, Religious and sacred art: Recent psychological perspectives in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA" 1/2022, pp 1-12, DOI: 10.3280/rip2022oa13589