Click here to download

Evaluation of the e-Invoicing Impacts through a set of Key Performance Indicators
Author/s: Francesco Bellini, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  13 Pg. 9-21 FullText PDF:  92 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MACO2015-003002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The dematerialization of business processes is one of the main challenges of the current decade. The concept of e-invoicing does not mean only the production and management of electronic invoices: it represents a part of the entire financial value chain and supply chain dematerialization (for its non-commodity component). Indeed the two value chains are now even more integrated and recent studies have shown significant monetary savings. The research question is now to define a reliable set of indicators, which is also able to capture and to synthesize the interactions between the Financial Value Chain and the Supply Chain. In this paper we propose and validate among experts a set of Key Performance Indicators able to monitor these value chains from the financial, strategic, supplier, order and delivery perspectives. The model has been validated through a survey that has been submitted to a number of players operating in different Italian value chains. The results obtained also allow building an assessment model in which a weight is assigned to each indicator and a comprehensive index can be generated.
Keywords: Dematerialization, e-Invoicing, Business management, Processes, Supply Chain, Metrics, Operational Costs, Simplification, Standards

  1. Bellini F., D’Ascenzo F., Ghi A., Spagnoli F., Traversi V. (2012), The impact of e-invoicing on Businesses Eco-Systems: evidences from Italian supply chains and suggestions for a research agenda. In: Daniela Mancini et al. (Eds.). Accounting Information Systems for Decision Making. vol. 3, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag GmbH, ISBN/ISSN: 9783642357602.
  2. Bhagwata R., Sharma M.K. (2007), Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 53, pp. 43-62., DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.04.001
  3. Christopher M. (1992), Logistics and Supply Chain Management, London, Pitman Publishing.
  4. Gunasekaran A., Patel C., McGaughey R.E. (2004), A Framework for Supply Chain Performance Measurement, International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 3, 333-347., DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003
  5. Gunasekaran A., Patel C., Tirtiroglu E. (2001), Performance measure and metrics in a supply chain environment, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, pp. 71-87., DOI: 10.1108/01443570110358468
  6. Hamilton M.B. (2009), Online Survey Response Rates and Times. Background and Guidance for Industry.
  7. Kaplan R.S., Norton P.D. (1992), The Balanced Scoreboard Measures That Drives Performance, Harvard Business Review, 70, 1, 71-79.
  8. Koch B. (2014), E-Invoicing/E-Billing-International Market Overview & Forecast, Billentis.
  9. Mason-Jones R., Towill D.R. (1997), Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive advantage, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 2, 4, pp. 137 – 148., DOI: 10.1108/13598549710191304
  10. Osservatorio Fatturazione Elettronica e Dematerializzazione: Italia Digitale: è possibile! (2012), School of Management, Politecnico di Milano.
  11. Popatenko T. (2010), Transition to e-invoicing and post-implementation benefits, Exploratory case studies, Aalto University School of Economics.
  12. Stewart G. (1995), Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 2, 8, pp. 38-44.

Francesco Bellini, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2015, pp. 9-21, DOI:10.3280/MACO2015-003002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content