Indicated actions to address bullying and victimization in schools. The results of PEBUC (Protocol for Emergency in BUllying Cases)

Author/s Ersilia Menesini, Giada Fiorentini, Annalaura Nocentini
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/1 Language Italian
Pages 24 P. 65-88 File size 257 KB
DOI 10.3280/MAL2021-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

trial. Bullying is a relevant problem in school context, however there are few nationally and internationally structured protocols to deal with this problem. The aim of the study is to evaluate PEBUC project, a standardized pro-tocol for indicated actions in bullying situations. The participants were 11 teachers from 2 Tuscany schools. The protocol includes: first report forms, in-depth screening forms, fol-low-up forms. The results show that following the protocol, teachers were able to take care of bullying episodes and effectively manage the situation. The efficacy of the proto-col underlines how schools need a report system and a structured protocol to tackle bullying and cyberbullying.

Keywords: Bullying, teachers, reporting, emergency protocol.

  1. Ansary, N. S. (2020). Cyberbullying: Concepts, theories, and correlates informing evidence-based best practices for prevention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50.
  2. Donghi, E., Pedroni, S., & Dimitri, S. (2018). Attraverso le sofferenze della vittima: tra bullismo, cyberbullismo e proposte di intervento. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 20(1), 31-45. DOI: 10.3280/MAL2018-001003
  3. Englander, E., Donnerstein, E., Kowalski, R., Lin, C. A., & Parti, K. (2017). Defining cyberbullying. Pediatrics, 140(2), S148-S151.
  4. Flay, B. R., Allred, C. G. & Ordway, N. (2001). Effects of the Positive Action Program on Achievement and Discipline: Two Matched-Control Comparisons. Prevention Science, 2(2), 71-89. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011591613728
  5. Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Van Schoiack Edstrom, L., MacKenzie, E. P. & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing Playground Bullying and Supporting Beliefs: An Experimental Trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology, 41(3), 479-491. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.479
  6. Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111-133.
  7. Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134-153.
  8. Herkama, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2018). KiVa antibullying program. In Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools (pp. 125-134). Academic Press.
  9. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E. & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 535-551.
  10. Langford, R., Bonell, C., Jones, H., Poliou, T., Murphy, S. Waters, E., Komro, K., Gibbs, L., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2015). The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 176.
  11. Menard, S., Grotpeter, J., Gianola, D., & O’Neal, M. (2008). Evaluation of Bullyproofing your School: Final report. -- Disponibile online:
  12. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Palladino, B. E. (2012). Empowering students against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian peer-led model. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6(2), 313-320.
  13. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A. & Palladino, B. E. (2017). Prevenire e contrastare il bullismo e il cyberbullismo. Bologna: il Mulino.
  14. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/23482
  15. Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R. & Menesini, E. (2010). Cyberbullying: labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20, 129-142.
  16. Nocentini, A., Menesini, E. & Pluess, M. (2018). The Personality Trait of Environmental Sensitivity Predicts Children’s Positive Response to School-Based Antibullying Intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(6), 848-859. DOI: 10.1177/2167702618782194
  17. Nocentini, A., Palladino, B. E. & Menesini, E. (2019). For Whom Is Anti-Bullying Intervention Most Effective? The Role of Temperament. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 388-399.
  18. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Blackwell: Oxford. Trad. it Il bullismo a scuola. Firenze: Giunti.
  19. Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 7–27). London: Routledge.
  20. Olweus, D. & Limber, S. (2010). Bullying in school: Evalutation and Dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(1), 124-134.
  21. Palladino, B. E., Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Luik, P., Naruskov, K., Ucanok, Z., ... & Scheithauer, H. (2017). Perceived severity of cyberbullying: Differences and similarities across four countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
  22. Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the shared concern method. School Psychology International, 23(3), 307-326, DOI: 10.1177/0143034302023003234
  23. Rigby, K., & Griffiths, C. (2011). Addressing cases of bullying through the Method of Shared Concern. School Psychology International, 32(3), 345-357. DOI: 10.1177/0143034311402148
  24. Rigby, K. (2014). How teachers address cases of bullying in schools: A comparison of five reactive approaches. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(4), 409-419. DOI: 10.1080/02667363.2014.949629
  25. Rigby, K. (2017). School perspectives on bullying and preventative strategies: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Education, 61(1), 24-39. DOI: 10.1177/0004944116685622
  26. Rigby, K., & Griffiths, C. (2018). Addressing traditional school-based bullying more effectively. In Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools (pp. 17-32). Academic Press.
  27. Salmivalli, C., Karna, A. & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405-411. DOI: 10.1177/0165025411407457
  28. Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56.
  29. Vandebosch, H. & Cleemput, K. V. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 499-503.
  30. van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2016). The support group approach in the Dutch KiVa anti-bullying programme: effects on victimisation, defending and well-being at school. Educational Research, 58(3), 221-236. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2016.1184949
  31. Yang, A. & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying programme on bully-victims, bullies and victims. Educational Research, 57(1), 80-90. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2014.983724
  32. Zanetti, M. A., & Colangelo, R. M. (2018). Educare per prevenire la sofferenza delle cybervittime. Ricadute educative a partire dalla Legge 71/2017. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 20(1), 11-30. DOI: 10.3280/MAL2018-001002
  33. Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). School bullying and cyberbullying: Prevalence, characteristics, outcomes, and prevention. In Handbook of behavioral criminology (pp. 113-138). Cham: Springer.

Ersilia Menesini, Giada Fiorentini, Annalaura Nocentini, Le azioni indicate per la gestione dei casi di bullismo e vittimizzazione nella scuola. I risultati della sperimentazione del progetto PEBUC (Protocollo di Emergenza per i casi di bullismo e cyberbullismo) in "MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL’INFANZIA" 1/2021, pp 65-88, DOI: 10.3280/MAL2021-001005