Bibliometric literature review: An opportunity for marketing scholars
Journal Title: MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ 
Author/s: Marco Galvagno 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  9 Pg. 7-15 FullText PDF:  77 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MC2017-004001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

 
%>


  1. Archambault É., Campbell D., Gingras Y., Larivière V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(7): 1320-1326.
  2. Baker M.J. (2000). Writing a literature review. The Marketing Review, 1(2): 219-247.
  3. Benson M.J., Sporakowski M.J., Stremmel A.J. (1992). Writing reviews of family literature: Guiding students using Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive objectives. Family Relations, 65-69.
  4. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. (2010). Co_citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2389-2404.
  5. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2389-2404.
  6. Boyack K.W., Newman D., Duhon R.J., Klavans R., Patek M., Biberstine J. R., et al. (2011). Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: Comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches. PLoS One, 6(3): e18029.
  7. Chabowski B.R., Hult G.T.M., Mena J.A. (2011). The retailing literature as a basis for franchising research: Using intellectual structure to advance theory. Journal of Retailing, 87(3): 269-284.
  8. Chabowski B.R., Mena J.A., Gonzalez-Padron T.L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958-2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1): 55-70.
  9. Chabowski B.R., Samiee S., Hult G.T.M. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6): 622-634.
  10. Cronin P., Ryan F., Coughlan M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-bystep approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1): 38-43.
  11. Di Guardo M.C., Galvagno M., Cabiddu, F. (2012). Analysing the intellectual structure of e-service research. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 4(2): 19-36.
  12. Fink A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage.
  13. Galvagno M. (2011). Anti-consumption research. Analisi bibliometrica della letteratura internazionale. Mercati e competitività, 2: 55-75.
  14. Galvagno M. (2011). The intellectual structure of the anti-consumption and consumer resistance field: An author co-citation analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12): 1688-1701.
  15. Galvagno M., Dalli D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24: 643-683.
  16. Garfield E. (1964). Science Citation Index-A new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619): 649-654.
  17. Garfield E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5259): 669-671.
  18. Gurzki H., Woisetschläger D.M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 77: 147-166.
  19. Hoffman D.L., Holbrook M.B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4): 505-517.
  20. Jones R.P., Jones R.P., Runyan R., Runyan R. (2016). Conceptualizing a path-topurchase framework and exploring its role in shopper segmentation. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(8): 776-798.
  21. Ketcham C.M., Crawford J.M. (2007). The impact of review articles. Laboratory Investigation, 87(12): 1174-1185.
  22. Kessler M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1): 10-25.
  23. Kim J., McMillan S.J. (2008). Evaluation of internet advertising research: A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising, 37(1): 99-112.
  24. Lee N., Greenley G. (2010). The theory-practice divide: thoughts from the editors and senior advisory board of EJM. European Journal of Marketing, 44(1/2): 5-20.
  25. Leone R.P., Robinson L.M., Bragge J., Somervuori O. (2012). A citation and profiling analysis of pricing research from 1980 to 2010. Journal of Business Research, 65(7): 1010-1024.
  26. Mendes G.H., Oliveira M.G., Gomide E.H., Nantes J.F.D. (2017). Uncovering the structures and maturity of the new service development research field through a bibliometric study (1984-2014). Journal of Service Management, 28(1): 182-223.
  27. Orsigher C. (2016). Synthtizing research in marketing through meta-analysis. Mercati e Competitività, 2: 7-10.
  28. Paré G., Trudel M.C., Jaana M., Kitsiou S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2): 183-199.
  29. Petticrew M., Roberts H. (2006). Synthesizing the Evidence, in Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  30. Pinto M.J., Fernandes S. (2015). New questions arise: are bibliometric indicators adequate for evaluating the scientific production of the Social Sciences and Humanities?. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4, SI: 161-169.
  31. Samiee S., Chabowski B.R. (2012). Knowledge structure in international marketing: a multi-method bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2): 364-386.
  32. Schmidt F. (2008). Meta-analysis: A constantly evolving research integration tool. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1): 96-113.
  33. Seyedghorban Z., Matanda M.J., LaPlaca P. (2016). Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(8): 2664-2677.
  34. Sinkovics N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3): 327-350.
  35. Sharplin A.D., Mabry R.H. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research: An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38(2): 139-149.
  36. Small H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4): 265-269.
  37. Sylvester A., Tate M., Johnstone D. (2013). Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12): 1199-1215.
  38. Torraco R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, 4(3): 356-367.
  39. van Raan A.F.J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: interdisciplinary research and perspectives, 3(1): 50-62.
  40. Webster J., Watson R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.
  41. White H.D., Griffith B.C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-171.
  42. Zupic I., Cater T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3): 429-472.

Marco Galvagno, in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 4/2017, pp. 7-15, DOI:10.3280/MC2017-004001

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content