Click here to download

The Role of the Smart Specialisation Agenda in a Reformed EU Cohesion Policy
Journal Title: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Author/s: Philip McCann, Ortega Ortega-Argilés 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  18 Pg. 15-32 FullText PDF:  630 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2014-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


TThe paper sets out to explore the regional entrepreneurship-promotion and innovation- promotion agenda which is a central component of the place-based reforms to EU Cohesion Policy. In particular, the paper examines the logic which underpins the smart specialisation concept, a concept which provides a powerful policy-prioritisation logic to this agenda. However, in order to understand why smart specialisation is so important in the Cohesion Policy reform process, it is also necessary to understand the context in which the concept originally emerged, and then to identify how the concept is translated to the regional setting. We illustrate the types of issues arising by means of several examples of policy initiatives.
Keywords: Regions, policy, Europe, innovation, growth.
Jel Code: L52, O43, R11, R58.

  1. Barca F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent report. (Last access October 2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/barca_en.htm).
  2. Barca F., McCann P. (2011), Outcome Indicators and Targets – Towards a Performance Oriented EU Cohesion Policy, methodological note. Meeting Climate Change and Energy Objectives. Improving the Conditions for Innovation, Research and Development. (Last access October 2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information/evaluations/guidance_en.cfm#1).
  3. BIS/DFID (2011), Trade and Investment Analytical Papers Topic 4 of 18. The UK and the Single Market. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (www.uk.gov).
  4. Bloom N., Sadun R., van Reenen J. (2005a), It Ain’t What You Do, It’s the Way that you do I.T. Testing Explanations of Productivity Growth Using US Affiliates, mimeo. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
  5. Bloom N., Dorgan S., Dowdy J., van Reene J., Rippin T. (2005b), Management Practices Across Firms and Nations, mimeo. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
  6. Boschma R. A., Iammarino S. (2009), Related Variety, Trade Linkages and Regional Growth. Economic Geography, 85, 3: 289-311., 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.x
  7. Boschma R. A., Minondo A., Navarro M. (2012), Related Variety and Regional Growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91, 2: 241-256., 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2011.00387.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2011.00387.x
  8. Boschma R. A., Frenken K. (2011), Technological Relatedness and Regional Branching. In: Bathelt H., Feldman M. P., Kogler D. F. (eds.), Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation. London: Taylor & Francis, Routledge. 187-197.
  9. Gordon R. J., Dew-Becker I. (2005), Why Did Europe’s Productivity Catch-up Sputter Out? A Tale of Tigers and Tortoises. San Francisco: Federal Research Bank of San Francisco.
  10. Crespi G., Haskel J. E., Haskel J. (2007), Information Technology, Organizational Change and Productivity. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper, n. 6105.
  11. David P., Foray D., Hall B. (2009), Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept and the Need for Indicators. Knowledge for Growth Expert Group. (Last access October 2013 – http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/monitoring/knowledge_en.htm).
  12. Draca M., Sadun R., van Reenen J. (2006), Productivity and ICTs: A Review of the Evidence. In: Mansell R., Avgerou C., Quah D., Silverstone R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press., 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548798.001.0001DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548798.001.0001
  13. ERAWATCH (2011), Development of a Methodology for the Profiling of Regional Economies. Brussels: Erawatch Network Asbl.
  14. Erken H., van Es F. (2007), Disentangling the R&D Shortfall of the EU vis-à-vis the US. Jena: Friedrich Schiller University & Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena Economic Research Papers n. 2007-107.
  15. ESPON (2012), KIT: Knowledge, Innovation Territory, Applied Research Project. (Last access October 2013 - http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/kit.html).
  16. European Commission (2010), Investing in Europe: Fifth Cohesion Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
  17. European Commission (2012), Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012. Brussels: European Union. (Last access October 2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris-2012_en.pdf).
  18. European Commission (2013), Monthly Update on Industrial Policy Indicators and Analysis. Brussels: European Commission. February.
  19. Foray D., David P., Hall B. (2009), Smart Specialisation – The Concept, Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n. 9, June 2009. Brussels: European Commission.
  20. Foray D., David P., Hall B. (2011), Smart Specialisation: From Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in its Implementation. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, MTEI Working Paper n. 2011.001.
  21. Foray D., Goddard J., Goenaga Beldarrain X., Landabaso M., McCann P., Morgan K., Neuwelaars C., Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3 Guide) S3 Smart Specialisation Platform. Seville: IPTS Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. (Last access October 2013 - http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/s3pguide).
  22. Frenken K., Boschma R. A. (2007), A Theoretical Framework for Evolutionary Economic Geography: Industrial Dynamics and Urban Growth as a Branching Process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 5: 635-649., 10.1093/jeg/lbm018DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
  23. Frenken K., Van Oor F. G., Verburg T. (2007), Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41, 5: 685-697., 10.1080/00343400601120296DOI: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  24. Gaffey V. (2013), A Fresh Look at the Intervention Logic of Structural Funds. Evaluation, 19, 2: 195-203., 10.1177/1356389013485196DOI: 10.1177/1356389013485196
  25. Gomez-Salvador R., Musso A., Stocker M., Turunen J. (2006), Labour Productivity Developments in the Euro Area. Frankfurt: European Central Bank, ECB, Occasional Paper n. 53.
  26. Gordon R. J. (2004), Five Puzzles in the Behavior of Productivity, Investment and Innovation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper n. 10660.
  27. Gu W., Wang W. (2004), Information Technology and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Canadian Industries. In: Jorgenson D. W. (ed.), Economic Growth in Canada and the United States in the Information Age. Ottawa: Industry Canada, Research Monograph Series. 51-81.
  28. Gu W., Kaci M., Maynard J. P., Sillamaa M. A. (2002), The Changing Composition of the Canadian Workforce and its Impact on Productivity Growth. In: Baldwin J. R., Harchaoui T. M. (eds.), Productivity Growth in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 69-75.
  29. Hughes, A. (2012) Choosing Races and Placing Bets: UK National Innovation Policy and the Globalization of Innovation Systems. In: Greenaway D. (ed.), The UK in a Global World. How Can the UK Focus on Steps in Global Value Chains that Really Add Value? BIS e-book. CEPR and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. www.cepr.org/pubs/books/cepr/ BIS_eBook.pdf. 22nd April 2013.
  30. Jorgenson D. W. (2001), Information Technology and the US Economy. American Economic Review, 90, 1: 1-32., 10.1257/aer.91.1.1DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.1.1
  31. Jorgenson D. W., Ho M. S., Stiroh K. J. (2005), Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  32. Jorgenson D. W., Ho M. S., Stiroh K. J. (2008), A Retrospective Look at the U.S. Productivity Growth Resurgence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 1: 3-24., 10.1257/jep.22.1.3DOI: 10.1257/jep.22.1.3
  33. Mathieu A., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. (2008), A Note on The Drivers of R&D Intensity. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper n. 6684.
  34. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2013), Modern Regional Innovation Policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6, 2: 187-216., 10.1093/cjres/rst007DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rst007
  35. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2014), Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth, and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, Forthcoming.
  36. Moretti E. (2012), The New Geography of Jobs. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  37. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011), How do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87, 3: 237-265., 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  38. OECD (2011a), Regions and Innovation Policy. Paris: Oecd.
  39. OECD (2011b), OECD Regional Outlook 2011. Paris: Oecd.
  40. OECD (2012), Promoting Growth in All Regions. Paris: Oecd.
  41. Oliner S., Sichel D. (2000), The Resurgence of Growth in the Late 1990s: Is Information Technology the Story?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, 4: 3-22., 10.1257/jep.14.4.3DOI: 10.1257/jep.14.4.3
  42. O’Mahony M., van Ark B. (eds.) (2003), EU Productivity and Competitiveness: An Industry Perspective. Can Europe Resume the Catching-up Process?. Luxembourg: European Commission.
  43. Ortega-Argilés R. (2012), The Transatlantic Productivity Gap: A Survey of the Main Causes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 3: 395-419., 10.1111/j.1467-6419-.2012.00725.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419-.2012.00725.x
  44. Sassen S. (ed.) (2002), Global Networks: Linked Cities. London: Routledge.
  45. Stiroh K. J. (2002a), Information Technology and the US Productivity Revival: What do the Industry Data Say?. American Economic Review 92, 5: 1559-1576., 10.1257/000282802762024638DOI: 10.1257/000282802762024638
  46. Stiroh K. J. (2002b), Reassessing the Role of IT in the Production Function: A Metaanalysis. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  47. Timmer M. P., van Ark B. (2005), Does Information and Communication Technology Drive EU-US Productivity Growth Differentials?. Oxford Economic Papers, 57, 4: 693-716., 10.1093/oep/gpi032DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpi032
  48. van Ark B., O’Mahony M., Timmer M. P. (2008), The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 1: 25-44., 10.1257/jep.22.1.25DOI: 10.1257/jep.22.1.25
  49. Wilson D. J. (2009), IT and Beyond: The Contribution of Heterogeneous Capital to Productivity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 27, 1: 52-70., 10.1198/jbes.2009.0005DOI: 10.1198/jbes.2009.0005
  50. World Bank (2010), Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Philip McCann, Ortega Ortega-Argilés, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2014, pp. 15-32, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2014-001002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content