Click here to download

What Identity for a Territorial Sociology?
Author/s: Alfredo Mela 
Year:  2015 Issue: 107 Language: Italian 
Pages:  9 Pg. 11-19 FullText PDF:  98 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2015-107002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The introduction starts highlighting the heterogeneity of the articles published in this issue of the journal. This observation gives the opportunity to propose a fundamental question for the sociological studies focused on the city and the territory, namely the problem of the identity of a territorial approach. The author states that this identity does not depend mainly on the topic of the analysis but rather on the way the relationships between social and spatial variables are studied. In some studies the territory is named only as a general framework in which social phenomena are placed: this may be typical of any kind of sociological research. However, only within the studies in which the territory is interpreted as an active factor that interacts with social variables it is possible to speak of a "territorial" approach, such as to establish the identity of a specific sociological sub-field.
Keywords: Territory, Territorial Sociology, Space, Context, Social Phenomena, Social Construction.

  1. Battaglini E. (2014). Sviluppo territoriale. Dal disegno della ricerca alla valutazione dei risultati. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Brondizio E.S., Ostrom E., Young O.R. (2012). Connectivity and the Governance of Multilevel Socio-ecological Systems: The Role of Social Capital. In B. Cristophe, R. Pérez (eds). Agro-ressources et éco-systèmes. Enjeux sociétaux et pratiques managériales.
  3. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. pp. 33-70.
  4. Castells M. (1968). Y a-t-il une sociologie urbaine? Sociologie du Travail, 1, pp. 72-90.
  5. Castells M. (1969). Théorie et idéologie en sociologie urbaine. Sociologie et sociétés, 2, pp. 171-192.
  6. Governa F. (2014). Tra geografia e politiche. Ripensare lo sviluppo locale. Roma: Donzelli.
  7. Gual M.A., Norgaard R.B. (2010). Bridging ecological and social systems coevolution: A review and proposal. Ecological Economics, 4, pp. 707-717., DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.02
  8. Kärrholm M. (2007). The Materiality of Territorial Production. A Conceptual Discussion of Territoriality, Materiality and the Everyday Life of Public Space. Space and Culture, 4, pp. 437-453., DOI: 10.1177/120633120730435
  9. Lakatos I. (1976). La falsificazione e la metodologia dei programmi di ricerca. In I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (a cura di). Critica e crescita della conoscenza. Milano: Feltrinelli. pp. 169-177.
  10. Martinotti G. (2011). Comment on Sharon Zukin/3. There Is, There Is! In Sociologica, 3., DOI: 10.2383/3641
  11. Mela A. (2006). Sociologia delle città. Roma: Carocci.
  12. Mela A. (2007). La città, oggetto non ovvio della sociologia. In SR Scienze Regionali, 3, pp. 137-154.
  13. Raffestin C. (1980). Pour une géographie du pouvoir. Paris: Litec.
  14. Raffestin C. (2012). Space, Territory and Territoriality, Environment and Planning D. Society and Space, 30, pp. 121-141., DOI: 10.1068/d2131
  15. Schatzki T.R., Knorr Cetina K., von Savigny E. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London-New York: Routledge.
  16. Turco A. (1988). Verso una teoria geografica della complessità. Milano: Unicopli.
  17. Zukin S. (2011). Is There An Urban Sociology? Questions on a Field and a Vision. In Sociologica, 3., DOI: 10.2383/3641

Alfredo Mela, What Identity for a Territorial Sociology? in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 107/2015, pp. 11-19, DOI:10.3280/SUR2015-107002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content