Il dibattito sulla Protezione Sociale Globale e Transnazionale. Introduzione

Titolo Rivista MONDI MIGRANTI
Autori/Curatori Simone Castellani, Francesca Lagomarsino
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/3 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 16 P. 27-42 Dimensione file 196 KB
DOI 10.3280/MM2019-003002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il Welfare State, consolidato nel corso del XX secolo come modello di protezione sociale nelle società neo-liberali, è stato messo sempre più in discussione. L’attuale crisi economica ne ha accelerato il deterioramento e i rischi sociali sono diventati più forti per una parte crescente della popolazione. In particolare, molti migranti restano ai margini dei sistemi di protezione sociale tradizionale a causa del loro status lavorativo e di residenza/cittadinanza. In questo senso, alcuni ricercatori hanno sottolineato la necessità di pensare ad una configurazione della protezione sociale che vada oltre i confini nazionali, proponendo di analizzare come le perso-ne che partecipano in progetti migratori transnazionali stanno ristrutturando la propria protezione per affrontare i rischi sociali. Questo monografico ha lo scopo di introdurre il dibattito sulla Protezione Sociale Globale e Transnazionale nell’ambito degli studi migratori italiani. Parte da una revisione dello stato dell’arte della produzione scientifica per poi apportare esempi di studi empirici originali rea-lizzati su questa linea in Italia, Spagna, Austria e Regno Unito.;

Keywords:Protezione sociale transnazionale; welfare state; reti migratorie transnazionali; resource environment; bricolage.

  1. Amelina A., Bilecen B., Barglowski K. e Faist, T. (2012). Ties That Protect ? The Significance of Transnationality for the Distribution of Informal Social Protection in Migrant Networks. SFB 882 Working Paper Series 6. Bielefeld -- https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2542199/2542200/SFB_882_WP_0006_Amelina_Bilecen_Barglowski_Faist.pdf (data consultazione 13/08/2019).
  2. Ambrosini M. (2015). Ngos and Health Services for Irregular Immigrants in Italy: When the Protection of Human Rights Challenges the Laws. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13, 2: 116-134; DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1017631
  3. Anderson B. (2000). Doing the Dirty Work. The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London and New York: Zed books.
  4. Avato J., Koettl J. e Sabates-Wheeler R. (2010). Social security regimes, global estimates, and good practices: the status of social protection for international migrants. World Development, 38, 4: 455-466;
  5. Baldassar L. e Merla L. (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care : understanding mobility and absence in family life. London and New York: Routledge.
  6. Barglowski K. e Pustulka P. (2018). Tightening early childcare choices – gender and social class inequalities among Polish mothers in Germany and the uk. Comparative Migration Studies 6, 1, SpringerOpen: 36;
  7. Barrett A. e Maître B. (2013). Immigrant Welfare receipt across Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 34, 1: 8-23; DOI: 10.1108/01437721311319629
  8. Bilecen B. (2019). ‘Altın Günü’: migrant women’s social protection networks. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1, SpringerOpen: 11;
  9. Bilecen B. e Barglowski K. (2015). On the Assemblages of Informal and Formal Transnational Social Protection. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 203-214;
  10. Bilecen B. e Sienkiewicz J.J. (2015). Informal Social Protection Networks of Transnational Social Spaces. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 227-243;
  11. Bimbi F. (1999). The Family Paradigm in the Italian Welfare State (1947-1996). South European Society and Politics 4, 2: 72-88; DOI: 10.1080/13608740408539571
  12. Boccagni P. (2016). Addressing transnational needs through migration? An inquiry into the reach and consequences of migrants’ social protection across borders, Global Social Policy, 17:168- 187; DOI: 10.1177/1468018116678523
  13. Boccagni P. (2015). Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transational ties in migrant informal social support, International Sociology, 30, 3: 250-268; DOI: 10.1177/0268580915570508
  14. Boccagni P. (2014). Caring about migrant care workers : from private obligations to transnational social Welfare ? Critical Social Policy, 34, 2: 221-240:; DOI: 10.1177/0261018313500867
  15. Bourguignon F. (2015). The Globalization of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Kofman E. e Raghhuram P. (2015). Gendered Migrations and Global Social Reproduction. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Lafleur J-M. e Mescoli E. (2018). Creating Undocumented eu Migrants through Welfare: A Conceptualization of Undeserving and Precarious Citizenship. Sociology, 52, 3: 480-496; DOI: 10.1177/0038038518764615
  18. Lafleur J-M. e Stanek M. (2017). Restrictions on Access to Social Protection by New Southern European Migrants in Belgium. In: Lafleur J-M. and Stanek M., eds., South-North Migration of eu Citizens in Times of Crisis (pp. 99-121). Amsterdam: Imiscoe & Springer; DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4
  19. Lafleur J-M. e Vivas Romero M. (2018). Combining transnational and intersectional approaches to immigrants’ social protection: The case of Andean families’ access to health. Comparative Migration Studies, 6, 1, SpringerOpen: 14;
  20. Lagomarsino F. (2006). Esodi e approdi di genere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Lecerf M. (2016). Poverty in the European Union The crisis and its aftermath. Brussels: European Parlament.
  22. Levitt P., Viterna J., Lloyd C. e Mueller A. (2017). Transnational Social Protection: Setting the Agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 45, 1: 2-19.
  23. Lillie N. e Simola A. (2016). The Crisis of Free Movement in the European Union. Mondi Migranti, 3: 7-20; DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2016.123970
  24. Martín Díaz E. (2011). El papel del género en la acumulación de capital social: el caso de las mujeres ecuatorianas. In: Ginieniewicz J., ed., La migración latinoamericana a España: una mirada desde el modelo de acumulación de activos (pp. 109-128). Quito: Flacso Ecuador and Global Urban Research Centre, University of Manchester.
  25. Mahon R. e Sonya M. (2017). Not In Focus: Migrant Women Caregivers As Seen by the Ilo and the Oecd. In: Michel S. and Peng I., eds., Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-Scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. Myles J. e Quadagno J. (2002). Political Theories of the Welfare State. Social Service Review, 76, 1: 34-57; DOI: 10.1086/324607
  27. Offe C. (1984). Contradiction of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
  28. Padilla B. (2013). Saúde dos imigrantes: multidimensionalidade, desigualdades e acessibilidade em Portugal. Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, 21, 40: 49-68.
  29. Pastore F. (2007). Europe, migration and development.Critical remarks on an emerging policy field, Development, 50: 56-62;
  30. Pastore F. (2004). Dobbiamo temere le migrazioni?. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  31. Pedone C. (2005). ‘Tú siempre jalas a los tuyos’. Cadenas y redes migratorias de las familias ecuatorianas hacia España. In: Herrera G., Carrillo M.C. and Torres A., eds. (pp. 105-143), La Migración Ecuatoriana. Transnacionalismo, Redes e Identidades. Quito: Flacso Ecuador.
  32. Pedone C. e Alfaro Y. (2018). La migración cualificada en America latina: una revision de los abordajes teoricos metodologicos y sus desafios, Periplos, vol 2, 3-18; DOI: 10.1787/570061570356
  33. Perna R. (2018). Re-bounding eu citizenship from below: practices of healthcare for ‘(Il)legitimate eu Migrants’ in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 5: 829-848; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1362977.
  34. Piperno F. e Tognetti Bordogna M. (2012). Welfare Transnazioanle. La frontiera interna delle politiche sociali. Roma: Ediesse.
  35. Phillimore J., Bradby H., Knecht M., Padilla B. e Pemberton, S. (2019). Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory and Health, 17, 2: 231-252;
  36. Razavi S. e Staab S. (2012). Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care: Worlds Apart. London: Routledge.
  37. Sabates-Wheeler R. (2019). Mapping differential vulnerabilities and rights: ‘opening’ access to social protection for forcibly displaced populations. Comparative Migration Studies , 7, 1. SpringerOpen: 38.
  38. Salazar Parreñas R. (2001). Servants of globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  39. Sayad A. (2002). La doppia assenza. Dalle illusioni dell’emigrato alle sofferenze dell’immigrato. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  40. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2017). Mobile Populations in Immobile Welfare Systems: A Typology of Institutions Providing Social Welfare and Protection Within a Mobility Framework. The European Journal of Development Research 29(4): 787–805.
  41. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2018). Providing social protection to mobile populations: symbiotic relationships between migrants and Welfare institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(13): 2127–2143. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1429900
  42. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2019). Moving for a ‘better Welfare’? The case of transnational Sudanese families. Global Networks 19(2): 139–157.
  43. Titmuss R.M. (1987). The Philosophy of Welfare: Selected Writings of Richard M. Titmuss. Abel-Smith B. and Titimuss K., editors. London: Allen & Unwin.
  44. Vathi Z., Duci V., and Dhembo E. (2019) Social protection and return migration: trans-national and trans-temporal developmental gaps in the Albania-Greece migration corridor. Migration and Development 8, 2. Routledge: 243–263. DOI: 10.1080/21632324.2018.1534377
  45. Williams F. (2011). The Transnational Political Economy of Care. In Mahon, R. and Robinson, F., eds., The Global Political Economy of Care: Integrating Ethical and Social Politisc (pp. 21-38). Vancouver: Ubc Press.
  46. Kofman E. (2003). The economic and social aspects of migration. Women migrants and refugiees in the European Union. Brussels: Ocde.
  47. Hooijer G. e Picot G. (2015). European Welfare States and Migrant Poverty: The Institutional Determinants of Disadvantage. Comparative Political Studies 48, 14: 1879-1904; DOI: 10.1177/0010414015597508
  48. Hochschild A.R. (2001). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In: Hutton W. and Giddens A., eds., On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130-146). London: Johnatan Cape; DOI: 10.4324/9781315633794
  49. Herrera G. (2013). “Lejos de tus pupilas”: Familias transnacionales, cuidados y desigualdad social en Ecuador. Quito: Flacso Ecuador.
  50. Habermas J. (1996). Citizenship and National Identity. In: Habermas J., ed., In Between Facts and Norm (pp. 491-515). Cambridge (ma): Mit Press.
  51. Goldschmidt T. (2015). Anti-Immigrant Sentiment and Majority Support for Three Types of Welfare. European Societies 17, 5: 620-652; DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2015.1088959
  52. Godin M. (2019). Far from a Burden: eu Migrants as Pioneers of a European Social Protection System from Below. International Migration. on-line first;
  53. Gimenéz C. (2004). Que es el codesarrollo? Expectativas, concepciones y escenarios de futuro. Madrid: Cecod.
  54. Ghimis A., Lazarowicz A. e Pascouau Y. (2014). Stigmatisation of eu mobile citizens : a ticking time bomb for the European project. Brussels- https://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_4096_stigmatisation_of_eu_mobile_citizens.pdf. (Data consultazione 13/08/2019).
  55. Folbre N. (2006). Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal of Human Development, 7, 2: 183-199; DOI: 10.1080/14649880600768512
  56. Ferrera M. (1996). The ’southern model’ of Welfare in social europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1: 17-37; DOI: 10.1177/095892879600600102
  57. Faist T. e Bilecen B. (2015). Social Inequalities Through the Lens of Social Protection: Notes on the Transnational Social Question. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 282-293;
  58. Faist T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 2: 189-222; DOI: 10.1080/014198700329024
  59. Faist T. (2014). On the transnational social question: How social inequalities are reproduced in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 24, 3: 207-222; DOI: 10.1177/0958928714525814
  60. Faist T. (2019). The Transnationalized Social Question. Migration and the Politics of Social Inequalities in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  61. Elson D. (1994). Micro, Meso, Macro: Gender and Economic Analysis in the Context of Policy Reform. In: Bakker I, editor, The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy (pp. 33-45). London: Zed books and South/North Institute.
  62. Eesc (2013). The impact of anti-crisis measures and the social and employment situation. Brussels: Eesc.
  63. Dobbs E., Levitt P., Parella S. and Petroff A. (2019). Social Welfare grey zones: how and why subnational actors provide when nations do not? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45, 9: 1595-1612; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1432343
  64. De Haas H. (2005). Remittances, migrationand social development. A conceptual review of the literarure, Paper 34, Ginevra, Unrisd.
  65. De Haas H. (2010). Migration and development : a teorethical perspective, International Migration Review, 44, 1: 227-264;
  66. Daly M. e Lewis J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary Welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology , 51, 2: 281-298;
  67. Castellani S. e Martín-Díaz E. (2019). Re-writing the domestic role: transnational migrants’ households between informal and formal social protection in Ecuador and in Spain. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1. SpringerOpen: 7;
  68. Castles S. (2007). Comparing the experience of five major emigration contries. In: Castles S. and Wise R., eds., Migration and development: perspectives from the South. Geneva: Oim.
  69. Cap P. (2017). Immigration and Anti-migration Discourses: The Early Rhetoric of Brexit. In: Cap P., editor, The Language of Fear (pp. 67-79). London: Palgrave Macmillan uk; DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_6

Simone Castellani, Francesca Lagomarsino, Il dibattito sulla Protezione Sociale Globale e Transnazionale. Introduzione in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 3/2019, pp 27-42, DOI: 10.3280/MM2019-003002