Click here to download

Should the patient in psychotherapy pay missed sessions?
Journal Title: RUOLO TERAPEUTICO (IL) 
Author/s:  A cura di Paolo Migone 
Year:  2011 Issue: 117 Language: Italian 
Pages:  12 Pg. 71-82 FullText PDF:  323 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RT2011-117007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The problem of payment of missed sessions on the part of the patient in psychotherapy is discussed, also with clinical examples. Both theoretical and clinical aspects are analyzed, also from the point of view of the history of psychoanalysis. The psychotherapeutic contract has important implications, both consciously and unconsciously, and for both patient and therapist. It is argued that in psychotherapy what is important is not whether the contract is or is not followed, because this would be reductive and potentially anti-therapeutic. What is important is the investigation of the feelings and behaviors regarding the contract, i.e., what in psychoanalysis is called analysis of transference and countertransference. The contract is only a tool in order to do therapy, because in psychotherapy "the way is the goal".
Keywords: Psychotherapeutic contract, payment of psychotherapy fees, missed sessions, transference, countertransference

A cura di Paolo Migone, Should the patient in psychotherapy pay missed sessions? in "RUOLO TERAPEUTICO (IL)" 117/2011, pp. 71-82, DOI:10.3280/RT2011-117007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content