Click here to download

Psychological warfare: Robert L. Spitzer and Allen Frances criticize the Dsm-5 process
Journal Title: PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 
Author/s: Robert L. Spitzer, Allen Frances 
Year:  2011 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 247-262 FullText PDF:  415 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PU2011-002007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


In two separate comments, Robert L. Spitzer (who was Head of the task force on DSM-III, of 1980) and Allen Frances (who was Head of the task force on DSM-IV, of 1994) strongly criticize the preparation of DSM-5, the fifth edition the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, scheduled for release in May 2013. Robert L. Spitzer ("Psychological Warfare: The DSM-5 Debate") recounts his experience in leading the DSM-III task force, and points out especially the lack of transparency in the DSM-5 process. Allen Frances ("Opening Pandora’s box: The 19 worst suggestions for DSM-5") discusses some problematic aspects of DSM-5 and lists several suggested diagnoses that are not adequately supported by empirical research and would inevitably increase the rate of false positive diagnoses and the use of potentially harmful medication (Allen Frances’ contribution is updated May 2011).
Keywords: DSM-5, psychiatric diagnosis, mental disorder, false positive diagnoses, transparency

Robert L. Spitzer, Allen Frances, Psychological warfare: Robert L. Spitzer and Allen Frances criticize the Dsm-5 process in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 2/2011, pp. 247-262, DOI:10.3280/PU2011-002007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content