Click here to download

Dissenting opinion, constitutional interpretation and popular constitutionalism
Author/s: Lucia Corso 
Year:  2011 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  29 Pg. 27-55 FullText PDF:  273 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2011-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

A dissenting opinion is the mechanism used by judges who disagree with the conclusions reached by the majority of the bench to air their own opinions. This essay describes the reasons behind this phenomenon, referencing American constitutional law, and proposes the thesis that the very presence of a dissenting opinion changes not only the content of constitutional jurisprudence, but also its style, setting off a virtual discussion between the judiciary and the public that also involves the latter in debates about fundamental rights. The author responds to the scepticism espoused by certain Italian neo-constitutionalists by outlining the hypothesis that dissent has the potential to improve a legal system’s democratic quality.
Keywords: Dissenting opinion, Constitutional interpretation, Popular constitutionalism, Demosprudence

Lucia Corso, Dissenting opinion, constitutional interpretation and popular constitutionalism in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2011, pp. 27-55, DOI:10.3280/SD2011-001002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content