Click here to download

Gender, ideology, and mass media: The different predictors of Ambivalent Sexism
Journal Title: PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’ 
Author/s: Chiara Rollero, Stefano Tartaglia 
Year:  2012 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  10 Pg. 119-128 FullText PDF:  433 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSC2012-002011
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Ambivalent Sexism Theory, proposed by Glick & Fiske (1996; 2011), posits that sexist attitudes encompass considerable ambivalence on the part of each sex toward the other. Such theory argues four dimensions of sexism: benevolent (BS) and hostile (HS) toward women, as well as benevolent (BM) and hostile (HM) toward men. Present study addresses the question of which factors mainly affect each of these dimensions. Male and female participants (N = 253) were given a questionnaire aimed at comparing the effects of different variables through four regression models. Respondents’ gender and ideological characteristics predicted HS, BM, and HM; watching television influences benevolent attitudes (both BS and BM), whereas the use of Internet increases HS.
Keywords: Ambivalent Sexism Theory, gender stereotypes, Social Dominance Orientation, Mass Media, Multiple Regression Models.

  1. Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y.A. (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 573-590
  2. Barreto M., Ellemers N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 633-642.
  3. Christopher A.N., Mull M.S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30: 223-230
  4. De Piccoli N., Rollero C. (2010). Differenze e diseguaglianze di genere tra Nord e Sud d’Italia. Attualità di uno stereotipo. Psicologia di Comunità, VI: 65-74.
  5. Di Stefano G., Roccato M. (2005). Una banca di item per misurare l’orientamento alla dominanza sociale in Italia. TPM, 12: 5-20.
  6. Gelli B. (2009). Psicologia della differenza di genere. Milano: Franco Angeli
  7. Glick P., Fiske S.T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 70, 491-512
  8. Glick P., Fiske S.T. (1999). The Ambivalence toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23 (3): 519-536.
  9. Glick P., Fiske S.T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56: 109-118
  10. Glick P., Fiske S.T. (2011). Ambivalent Sexism Revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35: 530-535.
  11. Glick P., Fiske S.T., Mladinic A., Saiz J.L., Abrams D., Masser B. et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 763-775
  12. Glick P., Lameiras M., Fiske S.T., Eckes T., Masser B., Volpato C. et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 713-728.
  13. Glick P., Lameiras M., Rodríguez Castro Y. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47: 433-441
  14. Holzner S. (2009). Facebook marketing: Leverage social media to grow your business. Albany, NY: SUNY press.
  15. Jost J.T., Kay A.C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse form of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 498-509
  16. Kian E.M., Clavio G., Vincent J., Shaw S.D. (2011). Homophobic and sexist yet uncontested: Examining football fan postings on Internet message boards. Journal of Homosexuality, 58 (5): 680-699
  17. Managanelli Rattazzi A.M., Volpato C., Canova L. (2008). L’atteggiamento ambivalente verso donne e uomini. Un contributo alla validazione delle scale ASI e AMI. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 35: 261-287
  18. Mazzara B. (2008). I discorsi dei media e la psicologia sociale. Roma: Carocci
  19. Moya M., Glick P., Expósito F., de Lemus S., Hart J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33: 1421-1434
  20. Nowatski J., Morry M.M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33: 95-107
  21. Plakoyiannaki E., Mathioudaki K., Dimitratos P., Zotos Y. (2008). Images of Women in Online Advertisements of Global Products: Does Sexism Exist?. Journal of Business Ethics, 83: 101-112
  22. Riva G. (2004). Psicologia dei nuovi media. Bologna: Il Mulino
  23. Rollero C., Fedi A. (2012). Ambivalent attitudes toward women and men: Recognizability of stereotypes and effects on self-perception. Psicología Politica, 44: 69-86
  24. Sakalli N. (2002). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44: 599-610
  25. Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1999), Social Dominance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  26. Viki G.T., Abrams D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47: 289-293.
  27. Wiles J.A., Wiles C.R., Tjernlund A. (1995). A Comparison of Gender Role Portrayals in Magazine Advertising: The Netherlands, Sweden and the USA. European Journal of Marketing, 29 (11): 35-49.

Chiara Rollero, Stefano Tartaglia, Gender, ideology, and mass media: The different predictors of Ambivalent Sexism in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 2/2012, pp. 119-128, DOI:10.3280/PSC2012-002011

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content