Click here to download

L’adozione mite: peculiarità, criteri di successo e valutazione di outcome
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI 
Author/s: Caterina Balenzano, Giuseppe Moro, Rosalinda Cassibba 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  21 Pg. 139-159 FullText PDF:  241 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SP2013-001008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 



  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. 2001 Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles, University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families
  2. Ammaniti, M. et alii. 1990 IAL. Intervista sull’attaccamento nella latenza, Manoscritto non pubblicato, Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi “La Sapienza”, Roma.
  3. Balenzano C., Moro G, Cassibba R. 2011 Welfare municipale e sostegno alla famiglia: valutazione del ruolo dei servizi territoriali nell’adozione mite, in «Politiche sociali e servizi», 1, pp. 97-108 (in revisione), Modelli e metodi per la valutazione delle politiche familiari evidencebased, in «Studi di Sociologia». (submitted), Dall’affido all’adozione: esplorare processi e percorsi mediante l’analisi dei fascicoli giudiziari, in «Autonomie locali e Servizi sociali».
  4. Barth, R. P., & Berry, M. 1988 Adoption and disruption: Risks, rates, and responses, New York, Aldine de Gruyter.
  5. Bracken, B. A. 1992 MSCS. Multidimensional Self-Concept Scale, Austin, PRO-ED, trad. it. TMA. Test di valutazione Multidimensionale dell’Autostima, Trento Erickson, 1993
  6. Brodzinsky, D. & Palacios, J. (Eds.) 2005 Psychological Issues in Adoption: Research and Practice, New York, Greenwood Publishing Group
  7. Brodzinsky, D. M., Smith, D. W., & Brodzinsky, A. B. 1998 Children’s adjustment to adoption: Developmental and clinical issues, Thousand Oaks, Sage
  8. Brooks, D., Allen, J., & Barth, R. P. 2002 Adoption services use, helpfulness, and need: A comparison of public and private agency and independent adoptive families, in «Children and Youth Services Review», 24, pp. 213–238.
  9. Cassibba, R., Abbruzzese, S., Costantini, A., & Gatto, S. 2009 L’adozione mite: giudici professionali e giudici onorari a confronto, in «Minorigiustizia», 1, pp. 112-122
  10. Corianò, A. 2008 Adozione Mite: conclusioni, www.dirittominorile.it/news/news.asp?id=798
  11. Costanzo, S. 2008 Nel percorso diventa cruciale la costruzione di un’altra identità familiare, in «Guida al diritto, Il Sole 24 Ore, Famiglia e minori», 9, pp. 31-34.
  12. Dell’Erba G. et alii. 2010 Lo standard del profilo SCL90R. Studio su campione di N. 1216 soggetti per la costruzione di norme italiane locali, in «Psicopuglia», 1, pp. 9-19.
  13. Derogatis, L. R. 1994 SCL-90-R: Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual, Minneapolis, National Computer Systems
  14. Edelstein, S., Burge, D., & Waterman, J. 2002 Older Children in Preadoptive Homes: Issues Before Termination of Parental Rights, in «Child Welfare», 81, 2, pp. 101-121.
  15. Etter, J. 1993 Levels of Cooperation and Satisfaction in 56 Open Adoptions, in «Child Welfare», 72, 3, pp. 257-267.
  16. Fiorini, M., 2008a Con l’adozione mite una risposta ai bambini del limbo, in «Famiglia e minori» 9, pp. 11-12.
  17. 2008b Corsia preferenziale all’esigenza di garantire la continuità degli affetti, in «Famiglia e minori» 9, pp. 19-23
  18. Giasanti, A., & Rossi, E., (a cura di) 2007 Affido forte e adozione mite: culture in trasformazione, Milano, FrancoAngeli
  19. Gibbs, D., Barth, R. P, & Houts, R. 2005 Family Characteristics and Dynamics Among Families Receiving Postadoption Services, in «Families in Society», 86, 4, pp. 520-532.
  20. Grotevant, H., & McRoy, R. 1997 The Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project: Implications of Openness in Adoption for Development and Relationship, in «Applied Developmental Science», 1, 4.
  21. Groze, V. 1996 Successful adoptive families: A longitudinal study of special needs adoption, Westport, Praeger
  22. Howe, D. & Steele, M., 2004 Contact in Cases in which Children have been Traumatically Abused or Neglected by their Birth Parents, in E. Neil, & D. Howe (Eds.), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, Theory and Practice, London, British Association for Adoption and Fostering.
  23. ones, M. 2002 Orders or Agreements? in H. Argent (ed.) Staying Connected: Managing Contact Arrangements in Adoption, London, British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering
  24. Lee, J. S., Twaite, J. A. 1997 Open Adoption and Adoptive Mothers: Attitudes toward Birthmothers, adopted Children and Parenting, in «American Journal of Orthopsychiatry», 67, 4, pp. 576-584
  25. Logan, J. 2010 Preparation and Planning for Face-to-Face Contact after Adoption: the Experience of Adoptive Parents in a UK study, in «Child and Family Social Work», 15, 3, pp. 315-324.
  26. Macaskill, C. 2002 Safe Contact? Children in Permanent Placement and Contact with their Birth Relatives, Lyme Regis, Russell House Publishing
  27. McDonald, T. P., Lieberman, A. A., Partridge, S., & Hornby, H. 1991 Assessing the Role of Agency Aervices in reducing Adoption Disruptions, in «Children and Youth Services Review», 13, pp. 425- 438.
  28. McGlone, K., Santos, L., Kazama, L., Fong, R., & Mueller, C. 2002 Psychological Stress in Adoptive Parents of Special-Needs Children, in «Child Welfare», 81, pp. 151-171.
  29. Miall, C. E. & March, K., 2005a Community Attitudes Toward Birth Fathers’ Motives for Adoption Placement and Single Parenting, in «Family Relations», 54, pp. 535-546.
  30. Molina, V. E., M. S. W. 2008 The Post Adoption Experience: The Early years of Motherhood (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), California State University, Long Beach.
  31. Moos, R., & Moos, B. 1986 Family Environment Scale (2nd ed.), Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologist Press.
  32. Nalavany, B. A., Ryan, S. D., & Hinterlong, J. 2009 Externalizing Behavior Among Adopted Boys with Preadoptive Histories of Child Sexual Abuse, in «Journal of Child Sexual Abuse», 18, 5, pp. 553-573.
  33. Neil, E. 2009 Post-adoption Contact and Openness in Adoptive Parents’ minds: Consequences for children’s development, in «British Journal of Social Work», 39, 1, pp. 5-23.
  34. Occhiogrosso, F. 2007 L’adozione mite e le nuove prospettive emergenti, in A. Giasanti, E. Rossi (a cura di), Affido forte e adozione mite, Milano, FrancoAngeli, pp. 91-117
  35. Occhiogrosso, F. P. 2008 Se il “semiabbandono” ha carattere permanente è applicabile l’istituto, in «Famiglia e Minori», 9, pp. 13-18.
  36. Palacios, J., 2006 The Ecology of Adoption, Keynote presentation at the Second International Conference on Adoption Research, UEA, Norwich
  37. Partidge, S., Hornby, H., & McDonald, T. 1986 Legacies of loss- Vision of Gain: An inside Look at Adoption Disruptions, Portland, Centre for research and Advanced Study, University of Southern Main.
  38. Rompf, E. L. 1993 Open Adoption: What does the “average person” think?, in «ChildWelfare», 72, pp. 219-230
  39. Rosenthal, J. A., & Groze, V. K. 1992 Special Needs Adoption: A follow-up study of intact families, New York, Praeger.
  40. Rosati, R. (a cura di) 2010 Il legame adottivo. Contributi internazionali per la ricerca e l’intervento, Milano, Unicopli
  41. Rosnati, R. 2005 The construction of adoptive parenthood and filiation in Italian families with adolescents: A family perspective in D. M. Brodzinsky & J. Palacios (Eds.), Psychological issues in Adoption: Research and Practice, Westport, Praeger, pp. 187-210
  42. Rosnati, R., Iafrate, R., & Scabini, E. 2007 Parent–adolescent Communication in Foster, Intercountry Adoptive and Biological Italian Families: Gender and Generational Differences, in «International Journal of Psychology», 24, pp. 35-45.
  43. Ruini, C., Ottolini, F., Rafanelli, C., Ryff, C., Fava, G. A. 2003 La validazione italiana delle Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB). Italian validation of Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB), in «Rivista di psichiatria», 38, 3.
  44. Ryff, C. D. 1989 Happiness is Everything, or is it? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-being, in «Journal of Personality and Social Psychology», 57, pp. 1069-1081.
  45. Selwyn, J. 2004 Placing older children in new families: Changing patterns of contact in E. Neil, and D. Howe (Eds.), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, Theory and Practice, London, British Association for Adoption and Fostering.
  46. Simmel, C. 2007 Risk and Protective Factors Contributing to the Longitudinal Psychosocial Well-Being of Adopted Foster Children, in «Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders», 15, 4, pp. 237-249
  47. Smith, S. & Howard, J. 1994 The Adoption Preservation Project, Normal, IL, Illinois State University, Department of Social Work
  48. Smith, S., Howard, J., & Monroe, A. 2000 Issues Underlying Behavior Problems in at-risk Adopted Children, in «Children and Youth Services Review», 22, pp. 539-562.
  49. Stagi, L. 2000 Il focus group come tecnica di valutazione. Pregi, difetti, potenzialità, in «Rassegna italiana di valutazione», 20, pp. 67-88.
  50. Wilson, K., & Sinclair, I. 2004 Contact in Foster Care: Some Dilemmas and Opportunities in E. Neil, & D. Howe (Eds.). Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care, London, British Association for Adoption and Fostering.
  51. Zosky, D. L., Howard, J. A., Smith, S. L., Howard, A. H., & Shelvin, K. H. 2005 Investing in adoptive families: What adoptive families tell us regarding the benefits of adoption preservation services, in «Adoption Quarterly», 8.

Caterina Balenzano, Giuseppe Moro, Rosalinda Cassibba, in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2013, pp. 139-159, DOI:10.3280/SP2013-001008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content