Click here to download

The verdict and the construction of historical "truth": Comments on the Canadian experience
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO  
Author/s: Giorgio Resta 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  23 Pg. 86-108 FullText PDF:  235 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2013-001007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This essay looks into the problem of the "legalisation" of history, examining the Canadian experience of the last twenty years and dwelling on three main questions, which it discusses in relation to the jurisprudence established by the Supreme Court of Canada. The first is that of the use of historical arguments on the part of the judge and of the increasing presence of historians in the process of judicial decision-making. The second is that of the admissibility of "oral history" as a source of proof in the framework of conflicts concerning the ancestral rights of Native American populations. The third is that of reparations in compensation for the suffering inflicted in the course of history, studied in the tragic affair of the Indian residential schools.
Keywords: History, Memory, Law, Reparations in compensation, Ancestral rights

  1. Asch, Michael, 2001. From Calder to Van der Peet. Aboriginal Rights and Canadian Law, 1973-96. In Paul Havemann (a cura di), Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Australia, Canada & New Zealand. Oxford, Melbourne, New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Barsh, Russel Lawrence & James Youngblood Henderson, 1997. The Supreme Court’s Van der Peet Trilogy: Naive Imperialism and Ropes of Sand. McGill Law Journal, 42: 993 ss
  3. Beaulieau, Alain, 2000. Les pièges de la judiciarisation de l’histoire autoctone. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 53: 541 ss
  4. Blackburn, Carole, 2012. Culture Loss and Crumbling Skulls: The Problematic of Injury in Residential School Litigation. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 35: 289 ss.
  5. Borrello, Maria, 2011. Sul giudizio: Verità storica e verità giudiziaria. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  6. Borrows, John, 2001. Listening for a Change: The Courts and Oral Tradition. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 39: 1 ss.
  7. Cajani, Luigi, 2012. Diritto penale e libertà dello storico. In Giorgio Resta & Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich (a cura di), Riparare Risarcire Ricordare: Un dialogo tra storici e giuristi. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica
  8. Calamandrei, Piero, 1939. Il giudice e lo storico. Rivista di diritto processuale civile, 16: 105 ss
  9. Calogero, Guido, [1937] 1964. La logica del giudice e il suo controllo in Cassazione. Padova: Cedam.
  10. Carta, Mario, 2012. Historical injustices: legittimazione passiva e forme della riparazione nel diritto internazionale ed europeo. In Giorgio Resta & Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich (a cura di), Riparare Risarcire Ricordare: Un dialogo tra storici e giuristi. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica
  11. Cassidy, Julie, 2006. The Stolen Generations – Canada And Australia: The Legacy of Assimilation. Deakin Law Review, 11: 131 ss
  12. Ceccherini, Eleonora, 2000. Diritti individuali v. diritti comunitari. In Giancarlo Rolla (a cura di), Lo sviluppo dei diritti fondamentali in Canada: Tra universalità e diversità culturale. Milano: Giuffrè
  13. Cooper-Stephenson, Ken, 2003. Theoretical Underpinnings For Reparations: A Constitutional Tort Perspective. Windsor Y.B. Access Justice, 22: 3 ss. —, 2007. Reparations for Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR and Politics. In Max du Plessis & Stephen Peté (a cura di), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses. Antwerpen-Oxford: Intersentia
  14. Coyle, Michael, 1986. Traditional Indian Justice in Ontario: A Role for the Present? Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 24: 605 ss.
  15. Dawson, Nelson Martin & Eric Tremblay, 2000. La preuve historique dans le cadre des procès relatifs au droit autochtone et aux crimes contre l’humanité. Revue de droit de l’Université de Sherbrooke, 30: 377 ss
  16. De Baets, Antoon, 2010. Responsible History. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.
  17. de Bellescize, Diane, 2008. L’autorité du droit sur l’histoire. In Jean Foyer, Gilles Lebreton & Catherine Puigelier (a cura di), L’autorité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  18. Dumoulin, Olivier, 2003. Le rôle social de l’historien: De la chaire au prétoire. Paris: Albin Michel
  19. du Plessis, Max, 2007. Reparations and International Law: How Are Reparations to Be Determined (Past Wrong or Current Effects), Against Whom, and What Form Should They Take? In Max du Plessis & Stephen Peté (a cura di), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses. Antwerpen, Oxford: Intersentia
  20. Etinson, Adam D., 2008. Aboriginal Oral History Evidence and Canadian Law. Central European Journal of Canadian Studies (CEJCS), 6: 97 ss.
  21. Fisher, Robin, 1992. Judging History: Reflections on Reasons for Judgment in Delgamuukw v. B.C. BC Studies, 95: 43 ss.
  22. Forsthoff , Ernst, 1965. Der Zeithistoriker als gerichtlicher Sachverständiger. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 18: 574 ss.
  23. Garapon, Antoine, 2008. Peut-on réparer l’histoire? Colonisation, esclavage, Shoah. Paris: Odile Jacob
  24. Gertler, Franklin S. & Peter W. Hutchins, 1990. The Marriage of History and Law in R. v. Sioui. Native Studies Review, 6: 115 ss
  25. Ginzburg, Carlo, 1991. Il giudice e lo storico: Considerazioni in margine al processo Sofri. Torino: Einaudi
  26. Grossfeld, Bernard & Josef Hoeltzenbein, 2007. Poetic Legal Dreams. American Journal of Comparative Law, 55: 47 ss.
  27. Henderson, James (Sa’ke’j) Youngblood, 2010. Constitutional Vision And Judicial Commitment: Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 14: 24 ss.
  28. Hylton, Keith N., 2004. Slavery and Tort Law. Boston University Law Review, 84: 1209 ss.
  29. Kahn, Robert, 2004. Holocaust Denial and the Law: A Comparative Study. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan
  30. Le Crom, Jean-Pierre, 1998. Juger l’histoire. Droit et société, 38: 37 ss
  31. Le Goff, Jacques, 1988. Histoire et mémoire. Paris: Gallimard
  32. Lévy-Dumoulin, Olivier, 2007. Des faits à l’interprétation: l’histoire au prétoire. La revue pour l’histoire du CNRS, 16: 1 ss.
  33. Martino, Pamela, 2008. La Carta Canadese dei diritti e delle libertà e i diritti ancestrali: l’incerto procedere della giurisprudenza della Corte suprema. In Giancarlo Rolla (a cura di), L’apporto della Corte suprema alla determinazione dei caratteri dell’ordinamento costituzionale canadese. Giuffrè: Milano
  34. McLeod, Clay, 1992. The Oral Histories of Canada’s Northern People, Anglo- Canadian Evidence Law, and Canada’s Fiduciary Duty to First Nations: Breaking Down The Barriers Of The Past. Alberta Law Review, 30: 1276 ss
  35. McNeil, Kent, 2004. The Vulnerability of Indigenous Land Rights in Australia and Canada. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 42: 271 ss
  36. Miller, Jim R., 2003. Troubled Legacy: A History of Native Residential Schools. Saskatchewan Law Review, 66: 357 ss.
  37. Miller, Bruce G., 2011. Oral History on Trial: Recognizing Aboriginal Narratives in the Courts. Vancouver, Toronto: UBC Press
  38. Milward, David, 2010. Doubting what the Elters have to say: A critical examination of Canadian judicial treatment of Aboriginal oral history evidence. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 14: 287 ss.
  39. Morin, Michel, 2000. Quelques réflexions sur le rôle de l’histoire dans la détermination des droits ancestraux ou issus de traités. Revue juridique Thémis, 34: 329 ss. —, 2003. Les insuffisances d’une analyse purement historique des droits des peuples autochtones. Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 57: 237 ss.
  40. Ogletree, Charles J., 2003. Repairing the Past: New Efforts in the Reparations Debate in North America. Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review, 38: 279 ss.
  41. Oxaal, Zoë, 2005. “Removing that which was Indian from the Plaintiff”: Tort Recovery for Loss of Culture and Language in Residential Schools Litigation. Saskatchewan Law Review, 68: 367 ss.
  42. Pech, Laurent, 2011. The Law of Holocaust Denial in Europe: Toward a (Qualified) EU-wide Criminal Prohibition. In Ludovic Hennebel & Thomas Hochmann (a cura di), Genocide Denial and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. Peté, Stephen & Max du Plessis, 2007. Reparations for Gross Violations of Human Rights in Context. In Max du Plessis & Stephen Peté (a cura di), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses. Antwerpen-Oxford: Intersentia
  44. Pezzino, Paolo, 2012. Lo storico come consulente. In Giorgio Resta & Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich (a cura di), Riparare Risarcire Ricordare: Un dialogo tra storici e giuristi. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica
  45. Reiter, Eric H., 2010. Fact, Narrative, and the Judicial Uses of History: Delgamuukw and Beyond. Indigenous Law Journal, 8: 55 ss.
  46. Resta, Giorgio & Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich, 2012. La storia “giuridificata”. In Giorgio Resta & Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich (a cura di), Riparare Risarcire Ricordare: Un dialogo tra storici e giuristi. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica
  47. Rodotà, Stefano, 2012. Il diritto di avere diritti, Roma-Bari: Laterza
  48. Rolla, Giancarlo, 2000. La tutela costituzionale delle identità culturali. In Giancarlo Rolla (a cura di), Lo sviluppo dei diritti fondamentali in Canada: Tra universalità e diversità culturale. Milano: Giuffrè.
  49. Rouland, Norbert, 1979. Les modes juridiques de solution des conflits chez les Inuit. Études/Inuit/Studies, 3 (hors-série): 1 ss.
  50. Rousso, Henri, 2000. Justiz, Geschichte und Erinnerung in Frankreich. Überlegungen zum Papon-Prozeß. In Norbert Frei, Dirk Van Laak & Michael Stolleis (a cura di), Geschichte vor Gericht: Historiker, Richter und die Suche nach Gerechtigkeit. München: Beck, 141 ss.
  51. Sacco, Rodolfo, 2007. Antropologia giuridica. Bologna: Il Mulino
  52. Saul, John R., 2009. The Roots of Canadian Law in Canada. McGill Law Journal, 54: 671 ss.
  53. Schulze, David, 1997. Recension de Denis Vaugeois: La fin des alliances francoindiennes: enquête sur un sauf-conduit de 1760 devenu un traité en 1990. McGill Law Journal, 42: 1045 ss.
  54. Stolleis, Michael, 2000. Der Historiker als Richter – der Richter als Historiker. In Norbert Frei, Dirk Van Laak & Michael Stolleis (a cura di), Geschichte vor Gericht: Historiker, Richter und die Suche nach Gerechtigkeit. München: Beck.
  55. Thomas, Yan, 1998. La vérité, le temps, le juge et l’historien. Le Débat, 102: 17 ss
  56. Vaughan, Frederick, 1989. The Use of History in Canadian Constitutional Adjudication. Dalhousie Law Journal, 12: 59 ss
  57. Vardi, Noah, 2012. Privatizzazione dei contenziosi e risarcimento per illeciti storici: Il caso della Holocaust litigation. In Giorgio Resta & Vincenzo Zeno- Zencovich (a cura di), Riparare Risarcire Ricordare: Un dialogo tra storici e giuristi. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica
  58. Vivant, Carole, 2007. L’historien saisi par le droit: Contribution à l’étude des droits de l’histoire. Paris: Dalloz.
  59. Walters, Mark, 1992. British Imperial Constitutional Law and Aboriginal Rights: A Comment on Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. Queen’s Law Journal, 17: 350 ss.
  60. Weil, Patrick, 2009. The Politics of Memory: Bans and Commemorations. In Ivan Hare & James Weinstein (a cura di), Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Giorgio Resta, The verdict and the construction of historical "truth": Comments on the Canadian experience in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2013, pp. 86-108, DOI:10.3280/SD2013-001007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content