Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Integrazione della VAS nei processi di pianificazione: il PTCP di Benevento
Titolo Rivista: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Autori/Curatori: Maria Cerreta, Pasquale De Toro 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2013 Fascicolo: 2  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  31 P. 15-45 Dimensione file:  1228 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2013-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il paper intende esplorare, attraverso un caso studio selezionato, come la Valutazione Ambientale Strategica (VAS) possa essere uno strumento di dialogo e di interazione tra differenti saperi, in grado di supportare processi di apprendimento, di gestione della conoscenza e di costruzione di scelte condivise, avvalendosi di approcci e tecniche opportuni. In questa prospettiva, la VAS può rivelarsi utile per supportare i processi decisionali a differenti scale e livelli, in grado di far dialogare valutazioni tecniche e politiche, con riferimento a valori complessi, parte integrante di realtà in conflitto ed in continua evoluzione, dove è necessario intervenire in coerenza con i principi della sostenibilità.


Keywords: VAS, pianificazione territoriale, processi decisionali strategici.
Jel Code: Q51

  1. ANSEA Team (2002), New Concepts in Strategic Environmental Assessment. Towards Better Decision-making. Madrid: TAU Consultora Ambiental
  2. Bina O. (2005), Strategic Environmental Assessment. Paper presented at the International Research Workshop: Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability. Held at Cambridge, October. Available at http:// www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/events/2005/epi/index.htm
  3. Bina O. (2007), A Critical Review of the Dominant Lines of Argumentation on the Need for Strategic Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 7: 585-606., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.003
  4. Bina O., Jing W., Brown L., Partidário M. R. (2011), An Inquiry into the Concept of SEA Effectiveness: Towards Criteria for Chinese Practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 6: 572-581., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.004
  5. Caratti P., Dalkmann H., Jiliberto R. (eds.) (2004), Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards Better Decision-Making. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  6. Castells N., Munda G. (1999), International Environmental Issues: Towards a New Integrated Assessment Approach. In: O’Connor M., Spash C. (eds.), Valuation and the Environment. Theory, Method and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 309- 327.
  7. CEAA – Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (1996), A Reference Guide for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act: Assessing Environmental Effects on Physical and Cultural Heritage Resources. Otawa: CEAA
  8. Costanza R., Funtowicz S. O., Ravetz J. R. (1992), Assessing and Communicating Data Quality in Policy-relevant Research. Environmental Management, 16, 1: 121-31., DOI: 10.1007/BF02393914
  9. De Mulder J. (2011), The Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Matter of Good Governance, RECIEL. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 20, 3: 232-247. doi:, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00731.x
  10. EC – Directorate General for Energy and Transport (2005), The SEA Manual. A Sourcebook o Strategic Environmental Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Plans and programmes. Brussels: BEACon
  11. Fischer T. B. (2001), Practice of Environmental Assessment for Transport and Landuse Policies, Plans and Programmes. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19, 1: 41-51.
  12. Fischer T. B. (2007), Theory and Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards a More Systematic Approach. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
  13. Fischer T. B., Kidd S., Jha-Thakur U., Gazzola P., Peel D. (2009), Learning through EC Directive based SEA in Spatial Planning? Evidence from the Brunswick Region in Germany. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 6: 421-428., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.03.001
  14. Fusco Girard L., Cerreta M., De Toro P., Forte F. (2007), The Human Sustainable City: Values, Approaches and Evaluative Tools. In: Deakin M., Mitchell G., Nijkamp P., Vreeker R. (eds.), Sustainable Urban Development. The Environmental Assessment Methods, vol. 2. London: Routledge. 65-93
  15. Fusco Girard L., Nijkamp P. (1997), Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  16. Gunn J., Noble B. F. (2011), Conceptual and Methodological Challenges to Integrating SEA and Cumulative Effects Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 2: 154-160., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.12.003
  17. João E. (2005a), Key Principles of SEA. In: Schmidt M., João E., Albrecht E. (eds.), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 3-14., DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27134-1_1
  18. João E. (2005b), SEA Outlook. Future Challenges and Possibilities. In: Schmidt M., João E., Albrecht E. (eds.), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 691-700., DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27134-1_47.
  19. João E. (2007), A Research Agenda for Data and Scale Issues in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 479-491., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.009
  20. Karstens S., Bots P., Slinger J. (2007), Spatial Boundary Choice and the Views of Different Actors. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 386-407., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.002
  21. Kontić B., Kontić D. (2012), A Viewpoint on the Approval Context of Strategic Environmental Assessments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 1: 151-155., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.07.003
  22. Levitt S., Dubner S. (2005), Freakonomics: a Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: William Morrow/Harper Collins
  23. Nilsson M., Wiklund H., Finnveden G., Jonsson D. K., Lundberg K., Tyskeng S., Wallgren O. (2009), Analytical Framework and Tool Kit for SEA Follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 3: 186-199., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.002
  24. Noble B. F. (2004), SEA Quality Assurance: Evaluating and Improving the Consistency of Judgments in Assessment Panels. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 1: 3-25., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255
  25. Noble B. F. (2009), Promise and Dismay: The State of Strategic Environmental Assessment Systems and Practices in Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 1: 66-75., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004
  26. Noble B. F., Storey K. (2001), Towards a Structured Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3, 4: 483-508.
  27. Partidário M. R. (2000), Elements of an SEA Framework. Improving the Added Value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 6: 647-63., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00069-X
  28. Partidário M. R. (2007), Scales and Associated Data. What is Enough for SEA Needs?, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 460-78., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.004
  29. Partidário M. R., Arts J. (2005), Exploring the Concept of Strategic Environmental Assessment Follow-up. Impact Assessment Project Appraisal, 23, 3: 246-57., DOI: 10.3152/147154605781765481
  30. Runhaar H. (2009), Putting SEA in Context: A Discourse Perspective on How SEA Contributes to Decision-making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 3: 200-209., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.003
  31. Stinchcombe K., Gibson R. (2001), Strategic Environmental Assessment as a Means of Pursuing Sustainability: Ten Advantages and Ten Challenges. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3, 3: 343-72., DOI: 10.1142/S1464333201000741
  32. Thérivel R. (2004), Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action. London: Earthscan
  33. Thérivel R., Partidario M. R. (eds.) (1996), The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
  34. Thérivel R., Ross B. (2007), Cumulative Effects Assessment: Does Scale Matter?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 365-85., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.001
  35. Thérivel R., Wilson E., Thompson S., Heany D., Pritchard D. (1992), Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan
  36. Verheem R., Tonk J. (2000), Strategic Environmental Assessment: One Concept, Multiple Forms. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19, 3: 177-82., DOI: 10.3152/147154600781767411
  37. Vicente G., Partidário M. R. (2006), SEA. Enhancing Communication for Better Environmental Decisions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 8: 696-706., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.005
  38. Wirutskulshai U., Sajor E., Coowanitwong N. (2011), Importance of Context in Adoption and Progress in Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Experience of Thailand. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 3: 352-359., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.001
  39. Wright F. (2007), Consideration of the Baseline Environment in Examples of Voluntary SEAs from Scotland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 5: 424-39., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.006

Maria Cerreta, Pasquale De Toro, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 2/2013, pp. 15-45, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2013-002002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche