Clicca qui per scaricare

Etica della ricerca transculturale in ambito sanitario: panacea o utopia?
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Autori/Curatori: Ann Gallagher, Robert Jago, Ventura Carla A. Arena, Mendes Isabel Amélia Costa 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2013 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  16 P. 67-82 Dimensione file:  114 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2013-003005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The scope and activities that constitute healthcare research are broad and everchanging given new research questions and methodologies. There is also an increasing range of international health research activities. Many of these activities raise significant ethical issues. In this article, healthcare researchers from the UK and Brazil examine some of the challenges that may arise in cross-cultural research and consider the most appropriate ethical frameworks that may be applied. It is concluded that an amalgam of key features of human rights discourse and virtue ethics, in a context of cultural safety, provide the most robust framework for research ethics in a global context. Indeed, this is also the best candidate for a transcultural research ethics.


Keywords: Etica della ricerca, assistenza sanitaria, sicurezza culturale, universalismo, diritti umani, etica delle virtù

  1. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (2012). Setting the agenda for cultural competence in healthcare: introduction and key findings. Retrieved from: www.ahrq.gov/research/cultural.htm#Introduction (Accessed 02/09/12).
  2. Beisiegel U. (2010). Research integrity and publication ethics. Atherosclerosis, 212: 383-385,, DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.050
  3. Biggs H. (2009). Healthcare research ethics and law: regulation, review and responsibility. London: Routledge Cavendish. Bosch X., Tituls S.L. (2009). Cultural challenges and international research integrity. The Lancet, 373: 610-612,, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60379-2
  4. Dogan H., Tschudin V., Hot I., Ozkan I. (2009). Patients’ transcultural needs and carers’ ethical responses. Nursing Ethics, 16, 6: 683-696,, DOI: 10.1177/0969733009341396
  5. European Science Foundation & All European Academies (2012). The European code of conduct for research integrity. Retrieved from: www.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/be_user/CEO_Unit/MO_FORA/MOFORUM_ResearchIntegrity/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf&t=1346790636&hash=51cf064769c439186f21308ae16449362e2c84a2 (Accessed 02/09/12).
  6. Gallagher A. (2010). The trouble with ‘transcultural nursing ethics’. Nursing
  7. Ethics, 17, 2: 155-156,, DOI: 10.1177/0969733009357837
  8. Geller G., Boyce A., Ford D., Sugarman J. (2010). Beyond ‘Compliance’: the role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity. Academic Medicine, 85, 8: 1296-1302,, DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5f0e5
  9. Georgetown University National Center for Cultural Competence (2012). Conceptual frameworks/models, guiding values and principles. Retrieved from: www11.georgetown.edu/research/gucchd/nccc/foundations/frameworks.html (Accessed 02/09/12).
  10. Habbermann B., Pryor M., Ziner ER., Wagler K. (2010). Research coordinators’ experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity. Nursing Research, 59, 1: 51-57,, DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3b9f2
  11. Hanssen I., Alpers LM. (2010). Utilitarian and common sense morality discussions in intercultural nursing practice. Nursing Ethics, 17, 2: 201-211,, DOI: 10.1177/0969733009355544
  12. Higher Education Funding Council for England (2012). The concordat to support research integrity HEFCE. Retrieved from: www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/Publications/Pages/concordattosupportresearchintegrity.aspx (Accessed 02/09/12).
  13. Hudson R. (2008). Research ethics and integrity - the case for a holistic approach. Research Ethics Review, 4, 4: 131-140,, DOI: 10.1177/174701610800400402
  14. International Conference on Harmonisation on Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (2012). Good clinical practice. Retrieved from: http://ichgcp.net (Accessed 02/09/12).
  15. INVOLVE (2012). User controlled research National Institute for Health Research. Retrieved from: www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/user-controlledresearch (Accessed 02/09/12).
  16. Jackson M., MacCrimmon M. (1999). Research confidentiality and academic privilege: a legal opinion. Retrieved from: www.sfu.ca/~palys/JackMacOpinion.pdf (Accessed 02/09/12).
  17. Leininger M. (2002). Culture care theory: a major contribution to advance transcultural knowledge and practice. Columbus: McGraw-Hill College Custom Series.
  18. Lignou S. (2011). The ‘standard of care’ debate and global justice in research. Research Ethics, 7, 1: 5-12,, DOI: 10.1177/174701611100700103
  19. Lowman J., Palys T. (2000). The research confidentiality controversy at Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from: www.sfu.ca/~palys/Controversy.htm.
  20. Macklin R. (1999). Against relativism: cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press Ministry of Health Brazil (1996). National Health Council: Resolution 196 from 1996 on research involving human subjects.
  21. Ndebole P. (2011), Research ethics. In: Chadwick R., ten Have H., Meslin E.M., eds., The Sage handbook of health care ethics. London: Sage Publications: 306-325.
  22. Papadopoulos I. (2006). Transcultural health and social care development of culturally competent practitioners. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.
  23. Plomer A. (2005). The Law and ethics of medical research: international bioethics and human rights. London: Cavendish.
  24. Poff D. (2010). Reflections on the relationship of research integrity to research ethics in publishing. Journal of Academic Ethics. 8: 259-263,, DOI: 10.1007/s10805-010-9126-8
  25. Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2010). Retrieved from: www.singaporestatement.org (Accessed 02/09/12).
  26. Steen G. (2010). Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 4. Retrieved from: http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2010/12/23/jme.2010.040923 (Accessed 02/09/12),, DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923
  27. Steen G. (2011). Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 11: 688-692,, DOI: 10.1136/jme.2011.043133
  28. UK Research Integrity Office (2009). Code of practice for research: promoting good practice and preventing misconduct. London: Ukrio.
  29. Woods M. (2010). Cultural safety and the socioethical nurse. Nursing Ethics, 17, 6: 715-725,, DOI: 10.1177/0969733010379296
  30. Zimmer C. (2012). A sharp rise in retractions prompts calls for reform. New York Times. Retrieved from: www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for reform.html?pagewanted=all (Accessed 02/09/12).
  31. Banks S., Gallagher A. (2009). Ethics in professional life: virtues for health and social care. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  32. Beauchamp T.L., Childress JF. (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed., New York: Oxford University Press

Ann Gallagher, Robert Jago, Ventura Carla A. Arena, Mendes Isabel Amélia Costa, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2013, pp. 67-82, DOI:10.3280/SES2013-003005

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche