Click here to download

Towards an interdisciplinary definition of "norm"
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO  
Author/s: Edoardo Fittipaldi 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  29 Pg. 7-35 FullText PDF:  321 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2013-002001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The author proposes a definition of norm suitable not only for sociology and anthropology, but also for ethology. The term norm is defined as the stable disposition to experience superegoic emotions: chiefly, though not exclusively, anger, indignation, shame, guilt and pride. Language plays no role in this definition. Anger is the typical right-holder’s emotion. Thus, a legal obligation or prohibition is reduced to the right-holder’s stable disposition to discharge his aggressiveness in case of inaction or action, respectively, on the part of the perceived duty-holder. As for shame and guilt, these are the emotions that typically make up the illusion of being a dutyholder. Finally, indignation or contagious shame are typical of possible third spectators. According to the author, this analysis enables the conflicts in societies that are elicited by emotions to be framed more accurately. The author concludes by proposing a complete reversal of the traditional view of the connection between law and force, as well as by proposing to complete the opposition between shame and guilt cultures in a way that also allows for the theoretical possibility of cultures of anger and indignation
Keywords: Norm - Aggressiveness - Super-Ego - Ethology - Shame - Guilt

  1. Bovet, Pierre, 1925*. Le sentiment religieux et la psychologie de l’enfant. English translation The Child’s Religion. London & Toronto: Dent & Sons 1928.
  2. Ceretti, Adolfo, & Lorenzo Natali. Cosmologie violente. Percorsi di vite criminali. Milano: Cortina.
  3. Conte, Amedeo G., 2011. Sociologia filosofica del diritto. Torino: Giappichelli.
  4. de Waal, Frans B. M., 1992. Aggression as a Well-integrated Part of Primate Social Relationships: A Critique of Seville Statement on Violence. In James Silverberg & J. Patrick Gray (eds.), Aggression and Peacefulness in Humans and Other Primates. New York - Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992.
  5. 1997. Good Natured. The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge (MA) - London: Harvard University Press.
  6. Durkheim, Émile, 1897*. Le suicide. English translation Suicide. New York: The Free press of Glencoe.
  7. Ferenczi, Sándor, 1925. Psychoanalysis of Sexual Habits. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 6: 372 ss.
  8. Ferrari, Vincenzo, 2005. Diritto e società. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  9. Fittipaldi, Edoardo 2012a. Everyday Legal Ontology. A Psychological and Linguistic Investigation within the Framework of Leon Petrażycki’s Theory of Law. Milan: Led.
  10. 2012b. Psicologia giuridica e realismo. Leon Petrażycki. Milan: Led.
  11. Freud, Anna, 1936*. Das Ich und die Abwehrmechanismen. English Translation The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. New York: International Universities Press. Inc. 1946.
  12. Freud, 1916. Einige Charaktertypen aus der psychoanalytischen Arbeit. Pubblico dominio.
  13. 1924. Das ökonomische Problem des Masochismus. Pubblico dominio.
  14. 1929. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Pubblico dominio.
  15. 1929*. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Traduzione italiana Il disagio della civiltà in Sigmund Freud (a cura di Cesare Musatti), Opere. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1989.
  16. Friedman, Lawrence, 1975. The Legal System. A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage.
  17. Geiger, Theodor, 19642. Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied am Rhein & Berlin: Luchterhand.
  18. Horney, Karen, 1950. Neurosis and Human Growth. The Struggle toward Self-Realization. New York & London: Norton & Company.
  19. Kurczewski, Jacek, 1976a. Ambiguous Reciprocity. The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 2: 5 ss.
  20. 1976b. Due dimensioni del diritto: diritto positivo o intuitivo e diritto ufficiale e non ufficiale. Sociologia del diritto, (1), 1: 29 ss.
  21. Lewis, Helen B., 1971. Shame and Guilt in Neurosis. New York: International University Press.
  22. Lewis, Michael. 1992. Shame. The Exposed Self. New York: The Free Press.
  23. Lorenz, Konrad, 1963*. Das sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. English translation On Aggression. New York & London: Harvest.
  24. Luhmann, Niklas, 1969*. Normen in soziologischer Perspektive. Traduzione italiana parziale Aspettative e norme, in Giuseppe Lorini & Lorenzo Passerini Glazel Filosofie della norma. Torino: Giappichelli: 2012.
  25. Mancia, Maurizio, 2010. Il narcisismo. Il presente deformato allo specchio. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  26. Mead, Margaret (ed.), 1937. Cooperation and Competition among Primitive Peoples. Boston: Beacon Press, 1961.
  27. Petrażycki, Leon, 1909-10. Teorija prava i gosudarstva v svjazi s teoriej nravstvennosti. 2nd ed, Sankt Peterburg: Ekateringofskoe Pečatnoe Delo.
  28. 909-10*. Teorija prava i gosudarstva v svjazi s teoriej nravstvennosti. 2nd ed. Partial English translation in Petrażycki 1955†.
  29. 1955†* (Nicholas S. Timasheff ed.). Law and Morality. Cambridge (Ma): Harvard University Press.
  30. Piaget, Jean, 1932. Le jugement moral chez l’enfant. Parigi: Presses Universitaires de France.
  31. 1932*. Le jugement moral chez l’enfant. Traduzione inglese The Moral Judgement of the Child. Londra: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  32. Rehbinder, Manfred, 2000. Rechtssoziologie. Monaco di Baviera: Beck.
  33. Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt & Clark R. McCauley, 2008. Disgust. In M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones & L.F. Barrett (a cura di), Handbook of Emotions, New York: Guildford Press, 20083.
  34. Sacco, Rodolfo, 1991. Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 1, 343 ss.
  35. 1992. Introduzione al diritto comparato. Torino: UTET.
  36. 1995. Mute Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 43, 3: 455 ss.
  37. 1997. Perché l’armato ubbidisce all’inerme? Saggio sulla legittimazione del potere. Rivista di diritto civile, 1997, I, 1 ss.
  38. 2007. Antropologia giuridica. Bologna: il Mulino.
  39. Sandler, Joseph, 1960. On the Concept of Superego. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15: 128 ss.
  40. Schlicht, Ekkehart, 1998. On Custom in the Economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  41. Shaver, Philip, Judith Schwartz, Donald Kirson & Cary O’Connor, 1987. Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (52) 6: 1061 ss., 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.106DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.106
  42. Silverberg, James & J. Patrick Gray (eds.), 1992. Aggression and Peacefulness in Humans and Other Primates. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. Smith, Adam, 17906. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Pubblico dominio.
  44. Tangney, June P., & Ronda L. Dearing, 2002. Shame and Guilt. London: The Guildford Press.
  45. Thomas, Jean-François, 2007. Déshonneur et honte en latin: Etude Semantique. Leuven : Peeters. 

Edoardo Fittipaldi, Towards an interdisciplinary definition of "norm" in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 2/2013, pp. 7-35, DOI:10.3280/SD2013-002001

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content