Click here to download

Confliggere cooperando. Un’analisi concettuale del conflitto politico in ambiente coalizionale
Author/s: Michelangelo Vercesi 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  14 Pg. 77-90 FullText PDF:  307 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PACO2013-003004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The concept of conflict is both crucial and equivocal in social sciences. Many meanings may be (and have been) ascribed to the word. Here, I seek to provide an empirical definition of social conflict that is linked to the notion of relation. The quality of the definition is tested by climbing down the ladder of abstraction and by using it for the definition and the clarification of a specific type of conflict, whose definition is often neglected in the social literature, that is, the political conflict which explodes in coalitions of political actors, where cooperation exists (or should exist).
Keywords: Contentious Politics; social movements; participation; conflict

  1. Andeweg R., Timmermans A. (2008), “Conflict Management in Coalition Government”, in K. Strøm, W.C. Müller, T. Bergman (a cura di), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 269-300.
  2. Arielli E., Scotto G. (2003), Conflitto e mediazione. Introduzione a una teoria generale, Milano, Bruno Mondadori.
  3. Aubert V. (1963), “Competition and Dissensus: Two Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, VII, 1, pp. 26-42.
  4. Barbieri C., Vercesi M. (2013), “The Cabinet: A Viable Definition and its Composition in View of a Comparative Analysis”, Government and Opposition, di prossima pubblicazione.
  5. Bernard J. (1957), “Parties and Issues in Conflict”, Conflict Resolution, I, 2, pp. 111-121.
  6. Blalock, Jr. H.M. (1989), Power and Conflict. Toward a General Theory, London, Sage.
  7. Boston J., Bullock D. (2012), “Multy-Party Governance: Managing the Unity-Distinctiveness Dilemma in Executive Coalitions”, Party Politics, XVIII, 3, pp. 349-368.
  8. Boulding K.E. (1957), “Organization and Conflict”, Conflict Resolution, I, 2, pp. 122-134. Clementi M. (1997), “I conflitti politici e sociali in Italia nel 1996. Un’analisi e alcuni elementi di comparazione”, Quaderni di scienza politica, IV, 3, pp. 379-427.
  9. Coser L.A. (1956), The Functions of Social Conflict, Glencoe, Free Press; tr. it. 1967, Le funzioni del conflitto sociale, Milano, Feltrinelli.
  10. Coser L.A. (1961), “The Termination of Conflict”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, V, 4, pp. 347-353.
  11. Dahrendorf R. (1959), Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanford, Stanford University Press; tr. it. 1963, Classi e conflitto di classe nella società industriale, Bari, Laterza.
  12. della Porta D., M. Diani M. (1997), I movimenti sociali, Roma, La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
  13. Fink C.F. (1968), “Some Conceptual Difficulties in the Theory of Social Conflict”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, XII, 4, pp. 412-460.
  14. Lasswell H.D. (1931), “Conflict: Social”, in E.R. Seligman, A. Johnson (a cura di), Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. IV, New York, Macmillan.
  15. Machiavelli N. (1995), Il principe, Torino, Einaudi (del 1513, per la prima volta apparso con il titolo De principatibus).
  16. Mack R.W., Snyder, R.C. (1957) “The Analysis of Social Conflict-Toward an Overview and Synthesis”, Conflict Resolution, I, 2, pp. 212-248.
  17. Mitchell C.R. (1981), The Structure of International Conflict, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
  18. Nevola G. (1994), Conflitto e coercizione. Modello di analisi e studio di casi, Bologna, Il Mulino. 1994.
  19. North R.C., Koch, Jr. H.E., Zinnes D.A. (1960), “The Integrative Functions of Conflict”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, IV, 3, pp. 355-374.
  20. Nousiainen J. (1993), “Decision-Making, Policy Content and Conflict Resolution in Western European Cabinets”, in J. Blondel, F. Müller-Rommel (a cura di), Governing Together. The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-Making in Western European Cabinets, New York, St. Martin’s Press, pp. 259-282.
  21. Pondy L.R. (1967), “Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models”, Administrative Science Quarterly, XII, 2, pp. 296-320.
  22. Popper K.R. (1959), “The Demarcation Between Science and Metaphysics”, in K.R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul; tr. it. 2009, “La demarcazione fra scienza e metafisica”, in K.R. Popper, Congetture e confutazioni. Lo sviluppo della conoscenza scientifica”, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 431-498.
  23. Popper K.R. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London, Hutchinson & Co.; tr. it. 1998, Logica della scoperta scientifica. Il carattere autocorrettivo della scienza, Torino, Einaudi.
  24. Rapoport A. (1974), Conflict in Man-Made Environment, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
  25. Sartori G. (1970), “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics”, American Political Science Review, LXIV, 4, pp. 1033-1053; tr. it. 2011, “Malformazione dei concetti in politica comparata”, in G. Sartori, Logica, metodo e linguaggio nelle scienze sociali, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 11-53.
  26. Schelling T.C., The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge e London, Harvard University Press; tr. it. 2006, La strategia del conflitto, Milano, Bruno Mondadori.
  27. Schmidt S.M., Kochan T.A. (1972), “Conflict: Toward Conceptual Clarity”, Administrative Science Quarterly, XVII, 3, pp. 359-370.
  28. Schumpeter J.A. (1954), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London, George Allen & Unwin; tr. it. 2001, Capitalismo, socialismo e democrazia, Milano, ETAS.
  29. Simmel G. (1908), Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot; tr. it. 1989, Sociologia, Milano, Comunità. Stein A.A. (1976),, “Conflict and Cohesion. A Review of the Literature”, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, XX, 1, pp. 143-172.
  30. Stoppino M. (2001), Potere e teoria politica. Terza edizione riveduta e accresciuta, Milano, Giuffrè.
  31. Strøm K. (1989), “Inter-Party Competition in Advanced Democracies”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, I, 3, pp. 277-300.
  32. Sumner W.G. (1906), Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals, Boston, Ginn & Co.; tr. it. 1962, Costumi di gruppo, Milano, Comunità.
  33. Thomas K.W. (1992), “Conflict and Conflict Management: Reflections and Update”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, XIII, 3, pp. 265-274.
  34. Vercesi M. (2012), “Le coalizioni di governo e le fasi della politica di coalizione: teorie e riscontri empirici”, Quaderni di scienza politica, XIX, 2, pp. 233-299.
  35. Weber M. (1921), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen, Mohr; tr. it. 1961, Economia e Società, Milano, Comunità.
  36. Weber M. (1922), “Über einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie”, in M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen, Mohr; tr. it.
  37. 2003, “Alcune categorie della sociologia comprendente”, in M. Weber, Il metodo delle scienze storico-sociali, Torino, Einaudi, pp. 181-239.
  38. Weber M. (1919), Politik als Beruf, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot,; tr. it. 2001, “La politica come professione”, in M. Weber, La scienza come professione, la politica come professione, Milano, Comunità, pp. 41-113.

Michelangelo Vercesi, in "PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO" 3/2013, pp. 77-90, DOI:10.3280/PACO2013-003004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content