Clicca qui per scaricare

The Centrality of Entrepreneurial Discovery in Building and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy
Titolo Rivista: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Autori/Curatori: Monica Coffano, Dominique Foray 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 33-50 Dimensione file:  628 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2014-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This paper is an attempt to clarify the essence of a smart specialisation strategy as a policy process. It aims in particular to explain why entrepreneurial discovery is an important design principle in this policy process. Finally, it presents the policy framework in which various tools and instruments need to be mobilized to maximize the likelihood of entrepreneurial discovery and facilitate the local concentration of resources in, and the early growth of the new activities generated by these discoveries.

L’obiettivo di questo lavoro è quello di chiarire l’importanza della specializzazione intelligente come processo di policy. In particolare, il lavoro mira a spiegare l’importanza della scoperta imprenditoriale nel processo di definizione delle politiche. Il lavoro discute il contesto nel quale diversi strumenti e meccanismi devono essere adottati così da massimizzare la frequenza delle scoperte imprenditoriali e facilitare la concentrazione locale di risorse nelle nuove attività generate da queste scoperte.
Keywords: Specializzazione intelligente, scoperta imprenditoriale, nuova politica industriale.
Jel Code: R10, R58

  1. Aghion P., David P. A., Foray D. (2009), Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice. Research Policy, 38, 4: 681-693., 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.016DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.016
  2. Agrawal A., Cockburn I. (2002), University Research, Industrial R&D and the Anchor Tenant Hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper n. 9212.
  3. Agrawal A., Cockburn I., Galasso A., Oettl A. (2012), Why are Some Regions More Innovative than Others? The Role of Firm Size Diversity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper n. 17793.
  4. Bailey D., MacNeil S. (2008), The Rover Task Force: A Case Study in Proactive and Reactive Policy Intervention?. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 1, 1: 109-124., 10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00007.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00007.x
  5. Bresnahan T. (2012), Generality, Recombination and Reuse. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited. Cambridge, MA: NBER & University of Chicago Press., 10.7208/chicago/9780226473062.003.0019DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226473062.003.0019
  6. Camagni R., Capello R., Lenzi C. (2014), A Territorial Taxonomy of Innovative Regions and the European Regional Policy Reform: Smart Innovation Policies. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 69-106.
  7. David P. A., Metcalfe S. (2009), How the Universities Can Best Contribute to Enhancing Europe’s Innovative Performance?. In: Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation. Report prepared for DG-Research. Brussels: EC. (Last access October 2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/selected_papers_en.pdf).
  8. Foray D., David P. A., Hall B. (2009), Smart Specialisation: The Concept. In: Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation. Report prepared for DG-Research. Brussels: EC. (Last access October 2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/investin-research/pdf/download_en/selected_papers_en.pdf).
  9. Foray D., Van Ark B. (2008), Smart Specialisation in a Truly Integrated Research Area is the Key to Attracting More R&D to Europe. In: Knowledge for Growth, European Issues and Policy Challenge, EUR 23725 EN. (Last access October 2013 - http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/knowledge_for_growth_bat.pdf).
  10. Frenken K., Van Oor F. G., Verburg T. (2007), Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41, 5: 685-697., 10.1080/00343400601120296DOI: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  11. Hall B., Learner J. (2010), The Financing of R&D and Innovation. In: Hall B., Rosenberg N. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 610-638., 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
  12. Hausmann R., Rodrik D. (2003), Economic Development as Self-discovery. Journal of Development Economic, 72, 2: 603-633., 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-XDOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
  13. Henderson R., Cockburn I. (1996), Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinant of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. The RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 1: 32-59., 10.2307/2555791DOI: 10.2307/2555791
  14. Hirshleifer J. (1971), The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity. American Economic Review, 61, 4: 561-74.
  15. Iacobucci D. (2014), Designing and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at Regional Level: Some Open Questions. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 107-126.
  16. Navarro M., Aranguren M. J., Magro Montero E. (2011), Smart Specialisation Strategies: The Case of Basque Country. Deusto: Basque Institute of Competitiveness, Orkestra Working Paper series, 2011-R07.
  17. Nikulainen T. (2008), Open Innovation and Nanotechnology: An Opportunity for Traditional Industries. Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, ETLA Working Paper, April.
  18. Rodrik D. (2004), Industrial Policy for the Twenty-first Century. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper n. 4767.
  19. Rosenberg N. (1995a), The Changing Nature of Medical Technology Development. In: Rosenberg N., Gelijns A. C., Dawkins H. (eds.) Sources of Medical Technology: Universities and Industry. Washington: National Academy Press. 3-14.
  20. Rosenberg N. (1995b), From the Scalpel to the Scope: Endoscopic Innovations in Gastroenterology, Gynecology and Surgery. In: Rosenberg N., Gelijns A. C., Dawkins H. (eds.) Sources of Medical Technology: Universities and Industry. Washington: National Academy Press. 67-96.
  21. Schlich T. (2002), Surgery, Science and Industry – A Revolution in Fracture Care, 1950s-1990s. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan., 10.1057/9780230513280DOI: 10.1057/9780230513280
  22. Trajtenberg M. (2002), Government Support for Commercial R&D: Lessons from the Israeli Experience. In: Jaffe A., Lerner J., Stern S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: NBER & MIT Press. 79-134.



  1. Bruno Monardo, Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions pp. 357 (ISBN:978-3-319-75773-5)
  2. João Lopes, João J. Ferreira, Luís Farinha, Innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3): Past, present and future research in Growth and Change /2019 pp. 38, DOI: 10.1111/grow.12268
  3. Arnault Morisson, Mathieu Doussineau, Regional innovation governance and place-based policies: design, implementation and implications in Regional Studies, Regional Science /2019 pp. 101, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2019.1578257
  4. Henning Kroll, Eye to eye with the innovation paradox: why smart specialization is no simple solution to policy design in European Planning Studies /2019 pp. 932, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1577363
  5. Lisa Nieth, Paul Benneworth, Challenges of knowledge combination in strategic regional innovation processes - the Creative Science Park in Aveiro in European Planning Studies /2019 pp. 1, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1699908
  6. Erkki Karo, Rainer Kattel, Aleksandrs Cepilovs, Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization pp. 269 (ISBN:9780128041376)
  7. Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma, Joan Crespo, David L. Rigby, Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification in Regional Studies /2019 pp. 1252, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
  8. Roberto Capello, Smart Specialisation Strategy and the New EU Cohesion Policy Reform: Introductory Remarks in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2014 pp. 5, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001001
  9. Pierre Alexandre Balland, Ron A. Boschma, Joan Crespo, David L. Rigby, Smart Specialization Policy in the EU: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification in SSRN Electronic Journal /2017 pp. , DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2995986
  10. Hugo Pinto, Carla Nogueira, Chiara Carrozza, Raphael D’Emery, New Paths of Entrepreneurship Development pp. 55 (ISBN:978-3-319-96031-9)
  11. Miren Estensoro, Miren Larrea, Overcoming policy making problems in smart specialization strategies: engaging subregional governments in European Planning Studies /2016 pp. 1319, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1174670
  12. Arturo Di Bella, Gianni Petino, Luigi Scrofani, The Etna macro-region between peripheralization and innovation: Towards a smart territorial system based on tourism in Regional Science Policy & Practice /2019 pp. 493, DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12176
  13. Roberta Capello, Andrea Caragliu, Ugo Fratesi, Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe: are cities sources of regional resilience? in Journal of Economic Geography /2015 pp. 951, DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
  14. Markku Sotarauta, Smart specialization and place leadership: dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? in Regional Studies, Regional Science /2018 pp. 190, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902
  15. Mikel Landabaso, Philip McCann, Raquel Ortega-Argilés, Smart specialisation in European regions: issues of strategy, institutions and implementation in European Journal of Innovation Management /2014 pp. 409, DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052
  16. Roberto Camagni, Roberta Capello, Rationale and Design of EU Cohesion Policies in a Period of Crisis in Advanced Engineering Forum /2014 pp. 11, DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.11
  17. Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, Innovation modes and entrepreneurial behavioral characteristics in regional growth in Small Business Economics /2016 pp. 875, DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9741-x
  18. Henning Kroll, Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization pp. 99 (ISBN:9780128041376)
  19. Roberta Capello, Towards a New Conceptualization of Innovation in Space: Territorial Patterns of Innovation in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research /2017 pp. 976, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12556
  20. Roberto Camagni, Roberta Capello, Rationale and design of EU cohesion policies in a period of crisis in Regional Science Policy & Practice /2015 pp. 25, DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12047
  21. Donato Iacobucci, Enrico Guzzini, La ‘Smart Specialization Strategy' delle regioni italiane e le relazioni fra ambiti tecnologici in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp. 5, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003001
  22. Ethan Gifford, Maureen McKelvey, Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and S3: Conceptualizing Strategies for Sustainability in Sustainability /2019 pp. 4824, DOI: 10.3390/su11184824
  23. Donato Iacobucci, Enrico Guzzini, Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: missing links in S3 design and implementation in European Planning Studies /2016 pp. 1511, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
  24. Alessandro Caramis, Livia Fay Lucianetti, Scoperta imprenditoriale e strategie di specializzazione intelligente: dalla teoria alla pratica in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp. 67, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003004

Monica Coffano, Dominique Foray, La centralità della scoperta imprenditoriale nella creazione e implementazione della strategia di specializzazione intelligente in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2014, pp. 33-50, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2014-001003

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche