Click here to download

A Territorial Taxonomy of Innovative Regions and the European Regional Policy Reform: Smart Innovation Policies
Author/s: Roberto Camagni, Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  37 Pg. 69-105 FullText PDF:  1157 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2014-001005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The current debate on a regional policy design to fit the Europe 2020 Agenda calls for additional reflection on how sectoral policies, like innovation policies, can be appropriately translated into a regional setting. The paper enters the debate on smart specialisation by claiming that innovation strategies call for the identification of common approaches for similar types of regions in order to prevent misallocation of public resources and unfeasible local strategies. For this purpose, a territorial taxonomy is suggested for the development of a regional innovation strategy, from which innovation policies for each regional mode of innovation are proposed.
Keywords: Smart specialisation, innovative regions, smart innovation policies.
Jel Code: R10, R58.ione JEL: R10; R58

  1. Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B., Braunerhjelm P., Carlsson B. (2004), The Missing Link: the Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper n. 4783.
  2. Acs Z., Audretsch D., Feldman M. (1994), R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 2: 336-340., DOI: 10.2307/2109888
  3. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. (2000), Geographic and Sectoral Characteristics of Academic Knowledge Externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79, 4: 435-443., DOI: 10.1007/PL00011486
  4. Antonelli C. (1989), A Failure Inducement Model of Research and Development Expenditure: Italian Evidence From the Early 1980s. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 12, 2: 159-180., DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(89)90053-X
  5. Asheim B., Boschma R., Cooke Ph. (2011), Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Base. Regional Studies, 45, 7: 893-904., DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  6. Audretsch D., Feldman M. (1996), R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review, 86, 3: 630-640.
  7. Balconi M., Brusoni S., Orsenigo L. (2010), In Defense of a Linear Model. Research Policy, 39: 1-13., DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.013
  8. Barca F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent report (Last access October 2013 -
  9. Basile R., Capello R., Caragliu R. (2012), Technological Interdependence and Regional Growth in Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 91, 4: 697-722., DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00438.x
  10. Bellet M., Colletis G., Lung Y. (1993), Introduction au numéro spécial sur économie et proximité. Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 3: 357-361.
  11. Boschma R. (2005), Proximity and Innovation. A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 39, 1: 61-74., DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  12. Camagni R. (1991), Technological Change, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks: Towards Dynamic Theory of Economic Space. In: Camagni R. (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter. 121-144.
  13. Camagni R. (2001), Policies for Spatial Development. In: OECD (ed.), Territorial Outlook, Ch. 6. Paris: Oecd. 147-169.
  14. Camagni R. (2008), Towards a Conclusion: Regional and Territorial Policy Recommendations. In: Capello R., Camagni R., Fratesi U., Chizzolini B. (eds.), Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 283-306., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_3
  15. Camagni R. (2011), Local Knowledge, National Vision: Challenges and Prospect for the EU Regional Policy. Paper for the Seminar on Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, Polish Ministry of Regional Development, held at Ostróda, Poland, July. (Last access October 2013 -
  16. Camagni R., Capello R. (2009), Knowledge-based Economy and Knowledge Creation: The Role of Space. In: Fratesi U., Senn L. (eds.), Growth and Competitiveness in Innovative Regions: Balancing Internal and External Connections. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 145-166., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70924-4_7
  17. Camagni R., Capello R. (2011), Macroeconomic and Territorial Policies for Regional Development: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the EU. In: Stimson B., Stough R., Nijkamp P. (eds.), Endogenous Regional Development: Perspective, Measurement and Empirical Investigations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 204-236., DOI: 10.4337/9781849804783.00016
  18. Camagni R., Capello R. (2013), Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Towards Smart Innovation Policies. Growth and Change, 44, 2: 355-389., DOI: 10.1111/grow.12012
  19. Capello R. (2009), Spatial Spillovers and Regional Growth: A Cognitive Approach. European Planning Studies, 17, 5: 639-658., DOI: 10.1080/09654310902778045
  20. Capello R. (2013), Territorial Patterns of Innovation. In: Capello R., Lenzi C. (eds.), Territorial Patterns of Innovation: An Inquiry on the Knowledge Economy in European Regions. London: Routledge. 129-150.
  21. Capello R., Caragliu A. (2014), Proximities and the Intensity of Scientific Relations: Synergies and Non-linearities. Forthcomming in International Regional Science Review.
  22. Capello R., Lenzi C. (2013a) (eds.), Territorial Patterns of Innovation: An Inquiry on the Knowledge Economy in European regions. London: Routledge.
  23. Capello R., Lenzi C. (2013b), Territorial Patterns of Innovation: a Taxonomy of Innovative Regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 51, 1: 119-154., DOI: 10.1007/s00168-012-0539-
  24. Cappellin R. (2003), Networks and Technological Change in Regional Clusters. In: Bröcker J., Dohse D., Soltwedel R. (eds.), Innovation Clusters in Interregional Competition. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 53-78., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24760-9_4
  25. Caragliu A., Lenzi C. (2013), Structural Elements and Dynamics in Territorial Patterns of Innovation: a Perspective through European Case Studies. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 5, 4: 369-383., DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12016
  26. Cooke P. (2009), The Knowledge Economy, Spillovers, Proximity and Specialisation. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Research, JRC. 29-39. (Last access October 2013 -
  27. Dosi G. (1982), Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: a Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy, 11, 3: 147-162., DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  28. EC – Commission of the European Communities (2010a), Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Suitable and Inclusive Growth, Communication from the Commission, COM(2010)2020. Brussels: EC.
  29. EC – Commission of the European Communities (2010b), Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe, COM(2010)553, Brussels. Brussels: EC.
  30. EC – Commission of the European Communities (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), Smart Specialisation Platform, May. Brussels: EC. (Last access October 2013 -
  31. Edgerton D. (2004), The Linear Model did not Exist. Reflections on the History and Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the Twentieth Century. In: Grandin K., Worms N., Widmalm S. (eds.), The Science Industry Nexus. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications. 31-57.
  32. ESPON (2012), Knowledge, Innovation, Territory (KIT). Final Report available on line. (Last access October 2013 -
  33. Foray D. (2009), Understanding Smart Specialisation. In: Pontikakis D., Kyriakou D., van Bavel R. (eds.), The Question of R&D Specialisation. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Research, JRC. (Last access October 2013 - 19-28.
  34. Foray D., David P., Hall B. (2009), Smart Specialisation - The Concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief , n. 9.
  35. Giannitsis T. (2009), Technology and Specialisation: Strategies, Options, Risks. Brussels: European Commission, Knowledge Economists Policy Brief , n. 8.
  36. Hägerstrand T. (1966), Aspects of the Spatial Structure of Social Communication and the Diffusion of Innovation. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 16, 1: 27-42.
  37. Hollanders H., Tarantola S., Loschky A. (2009), Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS) 2009, Pro Inno Europe Paper n. 14, Entreprise and Industry Magazine. Brussels. (Last access October 2013 -
  38. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. (1993), Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 3: 577-598., DOI: 10.2307/2118401
  39. Licht G. (2009), How to Better Diffuse Technologies in Europe, Expert Group Knowledge for Growth. Brussels: European Commission, Knowledge Economists Policy Brief n. 7.
  40. MacDonald S. (1987), British Science Parks: Reflections on the Politics of high Technology’. R&D Management, 17, 1: 25-37., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1987.tb00045.x
  41. Malecki E. (1980), Corporate Organisation of R&D and the Location of Technological Activities. Regional Studies, 14, 3: 219-234., DOI: 10.1080/09595238000185201
  42. Massey D., Quintas P., Wield D. (1992), High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space. London: Routledge.
  43. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2011), Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy. Barcellona: Institut d’Economia de Barcelona, IEB Working Paper n. 2011/14.
  44. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2014), The Role of the Smart Specialisation Agenda in a Reformed EU Cohesion Policy. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 15-32.
  45. Metcalfe J. (1981), Impulse and Diffusion in the Study of Technological Change. Futures, 13, 5, special issue: 347-359.
  46. Monk C. S. P., Porter R. B., Quintas P., Storey D., Wynarczyk P. (1988), Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.
  47. Mowery C. D., Rosenberg N. (1998), Path of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511611957
  48. Muller E., Nauwelaers C. (2005), Enlarging the ERA: Identifying Priorities for Regional Policy Focusing on Research and Technological Development in the New Member States and Candidate Countries. Final report COP6-CT.2004.00001.
  49. Navarro M., Gibaja J. J., Aguado R., Bilbao-Osorio B. (2008), Pattern of Innovation in the EU-25 Regions: A Typology and Policy Recommendations. Deusto: Deusto Foundation, Orkestra Working Papers Series in Territorial Competitiveness, n. 2008-04.
  50. Nelson R. (1959), The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 3: 297-306., DOI: 10.1086/258177
  51. Nelson R., Winter S. (1977), In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation. Research Policy, 6, 1: 36-76., DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4
  52. OECD (2010), Typology of Regional Innovation Systems, 20th session of the working party on Territorial Indicators. Paris: Oecd.
  53. OECD (2011), Territorial Outlook. Paris: Oecd.
  54. Pontikakis D., Chorafakis G., Kyriakou D. (2009), R&D Specialisation in Europe: From Stylized Observations to Evidence-Based Policy. In: Pontikakis D., Kyriakou D., van Bavel R. (eds.), The Question of R&D Specialisation, JRC. Brussels: European Commission, DG for Research. 71-84.
  55. Rallet A., Torre A. (eds.) (1995), Économie Industrielle et Économie Spatiale. Paris: Economica. 273-293.
  56. Saxenian A. (1996), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  57. Sipikal M., Bucek M. (2013), The Role of FDIs in Regional Innovation: Evidence from the Automotive Industry in Western Slovakia. European Planning Studies, Special issue, 5, 4: 401-415., DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12022
  58. Storey D. J., Tether B. S. (1998), Public Policy Measures to Support New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union. Research Policy, 26, 9: 1037-1057., DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00058-9
  59. Verspagen B. (2010), The Spatial Hierarchy of Technological Change and Economic Development in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 45, 1: 109-132., DOI: 10.1007/s00168-009-0293-8
  60. Winties R., Hollanders H. (2010), The Regional Impact of Technological Change in 2020. Report to the European Commission, DG for Regional Policy, on behalf of the network for European Techno-Economic Policy Support (ETEPS AISBL). (Last access October 2013 -

Roberto Camagni, Roberta Capello, Camilla Lenzi, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2014, pp. 69-105, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2014-001005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content