Clicca qui per scaricare

Designing and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at Regional Level: Some Open Questions
Titolo Rivista: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Autori/Curatori:  Donato Iacobucci 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  20 P. 107-126 Dimensione file:  636 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The aim of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical underpinnings and implementation problems of the RIS3. The analysis is carried out by reviewing the available literature on RIS3 and the proposals of 36 EU regions. The RIS3 approach requires the concentration of R&D efforts in a few domains. It requires a variable mix between research and innovation policy according to the region’s innovative capability. The paper discusses the theoretical and practical issues arising when trying to identify links between technological domains within the same regions and between different regions. The paper also questions the emphasis of the RIS3 on the bottom-up approach given that the design of a ‘strategy’ must necessarily rely, at least at the beginning, on a topdown approach. Suggestions are made on how to improve the design and implementation of the RIS3.

La Strategia della Specializzazione Intelligente (RIS3) richiede alle regioni di individuare settori e ambiti tecnologici su cui focalizzare gli investimenti in R&S. Lo scopo di questo lavoro è quello di discutere alcuni dei fondamenti teorici e dei problemi di attuazione della RIS3. L’analisi è basata sulla rassegna della letteratura disponibile sulla RIS3 e sulle proposte di 36 regioni dell’UE. L’efficacia dell’approccio RIS3 richiede un mix variabile di politiche per la ricerca e l’innovazione sulla base della capacità innovativa delle regioni e dell’identificazione di collegamenti tra i domini tecnologici all’interno della regione e fra diverse aree territoriali. Infine, il lavoro mette in dubbio l’enfasi della RIS3 circa la necessità di un approccio bottom-up.
Keywords: Strategia della specializzazione intelligente, politica regionale dell’innovazione, specializzazione e varietà.
Jel Code: L52, O43, R11, R58.

  1. Boschma R. (2005), Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 1: 61-74., 10.1080/0034340052000320887DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  2. Boschma R. (2014), Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 51-68.
  3. Asheim B. T. (2012), The Changing Role of Learning Regions in the Globalizing Knowledge Economy: A Theoretical Re-Examination. Regional Studies, 46, 8: 993-1004., 10.1080/00343404.2011.607805DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
  4. Asheim B. T., Boschma R., Cooke P. (2011), Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies, 45, 7: 893-904., 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  5. Aslesen H. W., Freel M. (2012), Industrial Knowledge Bases as Drivers of Open Innovation?. Industry Innovation, 19, 7: 563-584., 10.1080/13662716.2012.726807DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2012.726807
  6. Barca F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: a Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Bruxelles: Independent Report Prepared at the Request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy. Danuta Hübner, EC.
  7. Belussi F., Sammarra A., Sedita S. R. (2010), Learning at the Boundaries in an ‘Open Regional Innovation System’: A Focus on Firms. Innovation Strategies in the Emilia Romagna Life Science Industry. Research Policy, 39, 6: 710-721., 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014
  8. Boschma R., Eriksson R., Lindgren U. (2009), How Does Labour Mobility Affect the Performance of Plants? The Importance of Relatedness and Geographical Proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 2: 169-190., 10.1093/jeg/lbn041DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbn041
  9. Boschma R., Iammarino S. (2009), Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 3: 289-311., 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.x
  10. Broekel T., Meder A. (2008), The Bright and Dark Side of Cooperation for Regional Innovation Performance. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-University, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics, Jena Economic research papers n. 2008-053.
  11. Cainelli G., Iacobucci D. (2012), Agglomeration, Related Variety and Vertical Integration. Economic Geography, 88, 3: 255-277., 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01156.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01156.x
  12. Camagni R., Capello R. (2013), Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Towards Smart Innovation Policies. Growth and Change, 44, 2: 355-389., 10.1111/grow.12012DOI: 10.1111/grow.12012
  13. Camagni R., Capello R., Lenzi C. (2014), A Territorial Taxonomy of Innovative Regions and the European Regional Policy Reform: Smart Innovation Policies. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 69-106.
  14. Capello R. (2009), Spatial Spillovers and Regional Growth: A Cognitive Approach. European Planning Studies, 17, 5: 639-658., 10.1080/09654310902778045DOI: 10.1080/09654310902778045
  15. Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1: 128-152., 10.2307/2393553DOI: 10.2307/2393553
  16. D’Este P., Iammarino S. (2010), The Spatial Profile of University-Business Research Partnerships. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 2: 335-350., 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2010.00292.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2010.00292.x
  17. Dodgson M., Hughes A., Foster J., Metcalfe S. (2011), Systems Thinking, Market Failure, and the Development of Innovation Policy: The Case of Australia. Research Policy, 40, 9: 1145-1156., 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
  18. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000), The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 2: 109-123., 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  19. European Commission (2010), Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. Brussels: EC.
  20. European Commission (2011), High-Level Expert Group on Key Enabling Technologies. Final Report. Brussels: EC.
  21. European Commission (2012), Regional Innovation Scoreboard. Brussels: EC.
  22. Fitjar R. D., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012), Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42, 1: 128-138., 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009
  23. Foray D., David P. A., Hall B. (2009), Smart Specialisation – The Concept. Brussels: EC.
  24. Foray D., Goddard J., Beldarrain X. G., Landabaso M., McCann P., Morgan K., Nauwelaers C., Ortega-Argilés R., Mulatero F. (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3). Brussels: EC.
  25. Frenken K., Van Oort F., Verburg T. (2007), Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41, 5: 685-697., 10.1080/00343400601120296DOI: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  26. Hall B. H., Lerner J. (2005), The Financing of R&D and Innovation. In: Hall B., Rosenberg N. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 610-638.
  27. Hassink R. (2005), How to Unlock Regional Economies from Path Dependency? From Learning Region to Learning Cluster. European Planning Studies, 13, 4: 521-535., 10.1080/09654310500107134DOI: 10.1080/09654310500107134
  28. Hidalgo C. A., Klinger B., Barabasi A. L., Hausmann R. (2007), The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317, 5837: 482-487., 10.1126/science.1144581DOI: 10.1126/science.1144581
  29. Jacobs J. (1969), The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.
  30. Jensen M., Johnson B., Lorenz E., Lundvall B. (2007), Forms of Knowledge and Modes of Innovation. Research Policy, 36, 5: 680-693., 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
  31. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2013), Some Practical Elements Associated with the Design of an Integrated and Territorial Place-Based Approach to EU Cohesion Policy. In: Crescenzi R., Percoco M. (eds.), Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 95-118., 10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_6DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_6
  32. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2014), The Role of the Smart Specialisation Agenda in a Reformed EU Cohesion Policy. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 15-32.
  33. Metcalfe J. S. (2005), Systems Failure and the Case for Innovation Policy. In: Llerena P., Matt M. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge Based Economy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 47-74., 10.1007/3-540-26452-3_3DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26452-3_3
  34. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011), How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87, 3: 237-265., 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  35. Nieto M., Quevedo P. (2005), Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge
  36. Spillovers, and Innovative Effort. Technovation, 25, 10: 1141-1157., 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001
  37. Nooteboom B., Van Haverbeke W., Duysters G., Gilsing V., van den Oord A. (2007), Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity. Research Policy, 36, 7: 1016- 1034., 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
  38. Parrilli D. M., Elola A. (2012), The Strength of Science and Technology Drivers forSME Innovation. Small Business Economics, 39, 4: 897-907., 10.1007/s11187-011-9319-6DOI: 10.1007/s11187-011-9319-6
  39. Patel P., Pavitt K. (1997), The Technological Competencies of the World’s Largest Firms: Complex and Path-Dependent, but Not Much Variety. Research Policy, 26, 2: 141-156., 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-XDOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
  40. Pavitt K. (1984), Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13, 6: 343-373., 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  41. Ponds R., Van Oort F., Frenken K. (2007), The Geographical and Institutional Proximity of Research Collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 3: 423-443., 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x



  1. Emmanuel Muller, Andrea Zenker, Miriam Hufnagl, Jean-Alain Héraud, Esther Schnabl, Teemu Makkonen, Henning Kroll, Smart specialisation strategies and cross-border integration of regional innovation systems: Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space /2017 pp. 684, DOI: 10.1177/0263774X16688472
  2. Giuseppe Pronestì, Life Cycle of Clusters in Designing Smart Specialization Policies pp. 11 (ISBN:978-3-030-03779-6)
  3. Donato Iacobucci, Enrico Guzzini, La ‘Smart Specialization Strategy' delle regioni italiane e le relazioni fra ambiti tecnologici in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp. 5, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003001
  4. Roberta Capello, Henning Kroll, From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories in European Planning Studies /2016 pp. 1393, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
  5. Pierre Alexandre Balland, Ron A. Boschma, Joan Crespo, David L. Rigby, Smart Specialization Policy in the EU: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification in SSRN Electronic Journal /2017 pp. , DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2995986
  6. Monica Coffano, Dominique Foray, The Centrality of Entrepreneurial Discovery in Building and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2014 pp. 33, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001003
  7. Adrian Healy, Smart specialization in a centralized state: strengthening the regional contribution in North East Romania in European Planning Studies /2016 pp. 1527, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184233
  8. Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma, Joan Crespo, David L. Rigby, Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification in Regional Studies /2019 pp. 1252, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
  9. Davide Gianluca Bianchi, La governance multilivello delle strategie macro-regionali dell'ue: note critiche in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2016 pp. 5, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-001001
  10. Erkki Karo, Rainer Kattel, Aleksandrs Cepilovs, Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization pp. 269 (ISBN:9780128041376)
  11. João Lopes, João J. Ferreira, Luís Farinha, Innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3): Past, present and future research in Growth and Change /2019 pp. 38, DOI: 10.1111/grow.12268
  12. Henning Kroll, Eye to eye with the innovation paradox: why smart specialization is no simple solution to policy design in European Planning Studies /2019 pp. 932, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1577363
  13. Diego D'Adda, Donato Iacobucci, Roberto Palloni, Relatedness in the implementation of Smart Specialisation Strategy: a first empirical assessment in Papers in Regional Science pirs.12492/2019 pp. , DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12492
  14. Bruno Brandão Fischer, Maxim Kotsemir, Dirk Meissner, Ekaterina Streltsova, Patents for evidence-based decision-making and smart specialisation in The Journal of Technology Transfer /2019 pp. , DOI: 10.1007/s10961-019-09761-w
  15. Bruno Monardo, Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions pp. 357 (ISBN:978-3-319-75773-5)
  16. Fiorenza Belussi, Michaela Trippl, Agglomeration and Firm Performance pp. 283 (ISBN:978-3-319-90574-7)
  17. Roberto Capello, Smart Specialisation Strategy and the New EU Cohesion Policy Reform: Introductory Remarks in SCIENZE REGIONALI 1/2014 pp. 5, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001001
  18. Miren Estensoro, Miren Larrea, Overcoming policy making problems in smart specialization strategies: engaging subregional governments in European Planning Studies /2016 pp. 1319, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1174670
  19. Giuseppe Pronestì, Life Cycle of Clusters in Designing Smart Specialization Policies pp. 51 (ISBN:978-3-030-03779-6)
  20. Andrew Crawley, Angela Hallowell, Smart Specialisation: insights from the North American periphery in Regional Studies /2020 pp. 1, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1711877
  21. Michaela Trippl, Elena Zukauskaite, Adrian Healy, Shaping smart specialization: the role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions in Regional Studies /2019 pp. 1, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763
  22. Rimantas Dapkus, Aušra Ona Kuleševičiūtė, Regionų transformacijos į sumaniuosius konceptualus modelis in Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development /2015 pp. 189, DOI: 10.15544/mts.2015.17
  23. Alessandro Caramis, Livia Fay Lucianetti, Scoperta imprenditoriale e strategie di specializzazione intelligente: dalla teoria alla pratica in SCIENZE REGIONALI 3/2016 pp. 67, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-003004
  24. Jens Sörvik, Jukka Teräs, Alexandre Dubois, Martina Pertoldi, Smart Specialisation in sparsely populated areas: challenges, opportunities and new openings in Regional Studies /2019 pp. 1070, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1530752
  25. Donato Iacobucci, Enrico Guzzini, Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: missing links in S3 design and implementation in European Planning Studies /2016 pp. 1511, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
  26. Elvira Uyarra, Chiara Marzocchi, Jens Sorvik, How outward looking is smart specialisation? Rationales, drivers and barriers in European Planning Studies /2018 pp. 2344, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1529146

Donato Iacobucci, Progettazione e implementazione della strategia regionale di specializzazione intelligente: alcune questioni aperte in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2014, pp. 107-126, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2014-001006

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche