Click here to download

Designing and Implementing a Smart Specialisation Strategy at Regional Level: Some Open Questions
Journal Title: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Author/s:  Donato Iacobucci 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  20 Pg. 107-126 FullText PDF:  636 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The aim of this paper is to discuss some of the theoretical underpinnings and implementation problems of the RIS3. The analysis is carried out by reviewing the available literature on RIS3 and the proposals of 36 EU regions. The RIS3 approach requires the concentration of R&D efforts in a few domains. It requires a variable mix between research and innovation policy according to the region’s innovative capability. The paper discusses the theoretical and practical issues arising when trying to identify links between technological domains within the same regions and between different regions. The paper also questions the emphasis of the RIS3 on the bottom-up approach given that the design of a ‘strategy’ must necessarily rely, at least at the beginning, on a topdown approach. Suggestions are made on how to improve the design and implementation of the RIS3.
Keywords: Smart specialisation strategy, regional innovation policy, related variety.
Jel Code: L52, O43, R11, R58.

  1. Boschma R. (2005), Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 1: 61-74., 10.1080/0034340052000320887DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  2. Boschma R. (2014), Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 51-68.
  3. Asheim B. T. (2012), The Changing Role of Learning Regions in the Globalizing Knowledge Economy: A Theoretical Re-Examination. Regional Studies, 46, 8: 993-1004., 10.1080/00343404.2011.607805DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
  4. Asheim B. T., Boschma R., Cooke P. (2011), Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies, 45, 7: 893-904., 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  5. Aslesen H. W., Freel M. (2012), Industrial Knowledge Bases as Drivers of Open Innovation?. Industry Innovation, 19, 7: 563-584., 10.1080/13662716.2012.726807DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2012.726807
  6. Barca F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: a Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Bruxelles: Independent Report Prepared at the Request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy. Danuta Hübner, EC.
  7. Belussi F., Sammarra A., Sedita S. R. (2010), Learning at the Boundaries in an ‘Open Regional Innovation System’: A Focus on Firms. Innovation Strategies in the Emilia Romagna Life Science Industry. Research Policy, 39, 6: 710-721., 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014
  8. Boschma R., Eriksson R., Lindgren U. (2009), How Does Labour Mobility Affect the Performance of Plants? The Importance of Relatedness and Geographical Proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 2: 169-190., 10.1093/jeg/lbn041DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbn041
  9. Boschma R., Iammarino S. (2009), Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85, 3: 289-311., 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287-.2009.01034.x
  10. Broekel T., Meder A. (2008), The Bright and Dark Side of Cooperation for Regional Innovation Performance. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-University, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics, Jena Economic research papers n. 2008-053.
  11. Cainelli G., Iacobucci D. (2012), Agglomeration, Related Variety and Vertical Integration. Economic Geography, 88, 3: 255-277., 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01156.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01156.x
  12. Camagni R., Capello R. (2013), Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Towards Smart Innovation Policies. Growth and Change, 44, 2: 355-389., 10.1111/grow.12012DOI: 10.1111/grow.12012
  13. Camagni R., Capello R., Lenzi C. (2014), A Territorial Taxonomy of Innovative Regions and the European Regional Policy Reform: Smart Innovation Policies. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 69-106.
  14. Capello R. (2009), Spatial Spillovers and Regional Growth: A Cognitive Approach. European Planning Studies, 17, 5: 639-658., 10.1080/09654310902778045DOI: 10.1080/09654310902778045
  15. Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1: 128-152., 10.2307/2393553DOI: 10.2307/2393553
  16. D’Este P., Iammarino S. (2010), The Spatial Profile of University-Business Research Partnerships. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 2: 335-350., 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2010.00292.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957-.2010.00292.x
  17. Dodgson M., Hughes A., Foster J., Metcalfe S. (2011), Systems Thinking, Market Failure, and the Development of Innovation Policy: The Case of Australia. Research Policy, 40, 9: 1145-1156., 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.015
  18. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000), The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 2: 109-123., 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  19. European Commission (2010), Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. Brussels: EC.
  20. European Commission (2011), High-Level Expert Group on Key Enabling Technologies. Final Report. Brussels: EC.
  21. European Commission (2012), Regional Innovation Scoreboard. Brussels: EC.
  22. Fitjar R. D., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012), Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42, 1: 128-138., 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009
  23. Foray D., David P. A., Hall B. (2009), Smart Specialisation – The Concept. Brussels: EC.
  24. Foray D., Goddard J., Beldarrain X. G., Landabaso M., McCann P., Morgan K., Nauwelaers C., Ortega-Argilés R., Mulatero F. (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3). Brussels: EC.
  25. Frenken K., Van Oort F., Verburg T. (2007), Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 41, 5: 685-697., 10.1080/00343400601120296DOI: 10.1080/00343400601120296
  26. Hall B. H., Lerner J. (2005), The Financing of R&D and Innovation. In: Hall B., Rosenberg N. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 610-638.
  27. Hassink R. (2005), How to Unlock Regional Economies from Path Dependency? From Learning Region to Learning Cluster. European Planning Studies, 13, 4: 521-535., 10.1080/09654310500107134DOI: 10.1080/09654310500107134
  28. Hidalgo C. A., Klinger B., Barabasi A. L., Hausmann R. (2007), The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317, 5837: 482-487., 10.1126/science.1144581DOI: 10.1126/science.1144581
  29. Jacobs J. (1969), The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.
  30. Jensen M., Johnson B., Lorenz E., Lundvall B. (2007), Forms of Knowledge and Modes of Innovation. Research Policy, 36, 5: 680-693., 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
  31. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2013), Some Practical Elements Associated with the Design of an Integrated and Territorial Place-Based Approach to EU Cohesion Policy. In: Crescenzi R., Percoco M. (eds.), Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 95-118., 10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_6DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_6
  32. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2014), The Role of the Smart Specialisation Agenda in a Reformed EU Cohesion Policy. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13, 1: 15-32.
  33. Metcalfe J. S. (2005), Systems Failure and the Case for Innovation Policy. In: Llerena P., Matt M. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge Based Economy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 47-74., 10.1007/3-540-26452-3_3DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26452-3_3
  34. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011), How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87, 3: 237-265., 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
  35. Nieto M., Quevedo P. (2005), Absorptive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge
  36. Spillovers, and Innovative Effort. Technovation, 25, 10: 1141-1157., 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001
  37. Nooteboom B., Van Haverbeke W., Duysters G., Gilsing V., van den Oord A. (2007), Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity. Research Policy, 36, 7: 1016- 1034., 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
  38. Parrilli D. M., Elola A. (2012), The Strength of Science and Technology Drivers forSME Innovation. Small Business Economics, 39, 4: 897-907., 10.1007/s11187-011-9319-6DOI: 10.1007/s11187-011-9319-6
  39. Patel P., Pavitt K. (1997), The Technological Competencies of the World’s Largest Firms: Complex and Path-Dependent, but Not Much Variety. Research Policy, 26, 2: 141-156., 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-XDOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
  40. Pavitt K. (1984), Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory. Research Policy, 13, 6: 343-373., 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  41. Ponds R., Van Oort F., Frenken K. (2007), The Geographical and Institutional Proximity of Research Collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 3: 423-443., 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x

Donato Iacobucci, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2014, pp. 107-126, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2014-001006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content