Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Integrated Assessment for Sustainable Choices
Titolo Rivista: SCIENZE REGIONALI  
Autori/Curatori: Girard Luigi Fusco, Maria Cerreta, Pasquale De Toro 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: 1 Suppl.  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  31 P. 111-141 Dimensione file:  9194 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2014-S01006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The paper explores how "integrated assessment" can represent a specific multimethodological framework that can include the cognitive skills and habits of the stakeholders and experts involved in mutual, joint, and dynamic learning processes, where interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are an essential element. The paper selects three case studies, and analyses how assessment can be a tool for building dialogue and interaction among different types of expertise that can support these learning processes, knowledge management, and the construction of shared choices, thereby creating a network of relationship among technical, social and political assessments, and referring to complex values that are constitutive of conflicting and changing realities.

Il contributo esplora come le "valutazioni integrate" possono rappresentare un particolare campo multi-metodologico in grado di includere sia le capacità cognitive che i comportamenti degli stakeholder e degli esperti coinvolti in processi di apprendimento reciproci, congiunti e dinamici, in cui l’interdisciplinarità e la transdisciplinarietà sono essenziali. Attraverso una selezione di tre casi di studio, l’articolo analizza come la valutazione possa essere uno strumento per costruire il dialogo e l’interazione tra le diverse competenze in grado di supportare i processi di apprendimento, la gestione della conoscenza e la costruzione di scelte condivise, creando un sistema di relazioni tra valutazioni tecniche, sociali e politiche, e facendo riferimento a valori complessi che sono costitutivi di realtà in conflitto e mutevoli.
Keywords: Valore sociale complesso, sistemi di supporto alla decisione, valutazioni integrate
Jel Code: D81, Q51

  1. Al-Shalabi M. A., Bin Mansor S., Bin Ahmed N., Shiriff R. (2006), GIS Based Multicriteria Approaches to Housing Site Suitability Assessment. Paper presented to the XXIII FIG Congress, Shaping the Change, held at Munich, October.
  2. Brouwer R., van Ek R. (2004), Integrated Ecological, Economic and Social Impact Assessment of Alternative Flood Control Policies in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 50, 1-2: 1-21., DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.020
  3. Castells N., Munda G. (1999), International Environmental Issues: Towards a New Integrated Assessment Approach. In: O’Connor M., Spash C. (eds.), Valuation and the Environment. Theory, Method and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 309-327.
  4. Chen K., Blong R., Jacobson C. (2001), MCE-RISK: Integrating Multicriteria Evaluation and GIS for Risk Decision-Making in Natural Hazards. Environmental Modelling and Software, 16, 4: 387-397., DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00006-8
  5. Dalkmann H., Herrera R. J., Bongardt D. (2004), Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment (ANSEA) Developing a New Approach to SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 4: 385-402., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.021
  6. De Marchi B. (1999), Data Collection and Data Creation. Advanced Course in Decision Tools and Processes for Integrated Environmental Assessment. Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, September-October.
  7. Eden C., Simpson P. (1989), SODA and Cognitive Mapping in Practice. In: Rosenhead J. (ed.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 43-70.
  8. Finnveden G., Nilsonn M., Johansonn J., Personn Å., Moberg Å., Carlsonn T. (2003), Strategic Environmental Assessment Methodologies – Application within the Energy Sector. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 1: 91-123., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00089-6
  9. Funtowicz S., De Marchi B., Lo Cascio S., Munda G. (1998), The Troina Water Valuation. Case Study, Report of Research Programme ‘Social Processes for Environmental Valuation’. The Valse Project. Université de Versailles: C3ED.
  10. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. R. (1993), Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25, 7: 739–755., DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
  11. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. R. (1994), Emergent Complex Systems. Futures, 26, 6: 568–582., DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90029-9
  12. Fusco Girard L. (1987), Risorse architettoniche e culturali: valutazioni e strategie di conservazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Fusco Girard L., Cerreta M., De Toro P. (2006), Integrated Spatial Analysis: A Decision Support System for Territorial Planning. Paper presented to the International Meeting MTSID’06, Methods, Models and Information Technologies for Decision Support, held at Procida (NA): Italy, September.
  14. Fusco Girard L., Cerreta M., De Toro P. (2008), ValSI: un Sistema di Supporto alle Decisioni per la Pianificazione Territoriale. In: D’Ambra L., Rostirolla P., Squillante M. (eds.), Metodi, Modelli e Tecnologie del’informazione a Supporto delle Decisioni. Parte prima: Metodologie. Milano: FrancoAngeli. 225-232.
  15. Fusco Girard L., Cerreta M., De Toro P., Forte F. (2007), The Human Sustainable City: Values, Approaches and Evaluative Tools. In: Deakin M., Mitchell G., Nijkamp P., Vreeker R. (eds.) Sustainable Urban Development. The Environmental Assessment Methods, Vol. 2. London: Routledge. 65-93.
  16. Fusco Girard L., Nijkamp P. (1997), Le valutazioni per lo sviluppo sostenibile della città e del territorio. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  17. Geneletti D. (2004), A GIS-Based Decision Support System to Identify Nature Conservation Priorities in an Alpine Valley. Land Use Policy, 21, 2: 149-60., DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.09.005
  18. Golub A. L. (1997), Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Hinloopen E., Nijkamp P. (1990), Quantitative Multiple Criteria Choice Analysis. Quality and Quantity, 24, 1: 37-56., DOI: 10.1007/BF00221383
  20. Janssen R., Goosen H., Verhoeven M. L., Verhoeven J. T. A., Omtzigt A. Q. A., Maltby E. (2005), Decision Support for Integrated Wetland Management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 2: 215-229., DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.020
  21. Janssen R., van Herwijnen M., Beinat E. (2001), DEFINITE (version 2) Decision Support System for a FINITE Set of Alternatives. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Institute for Environmental Studies.
  22. Joerin F., Musy A. (2000), Land Management with GIS and Multicriteria Analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 7,1: 67-78., DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00185.x
  23. Lee N. (2006), Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Integrated Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 1: 57-78., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.01.001
  24. Malczewski J. (1999), GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Marinoni O. (2004), Implementation of Analytic Hierarchy Process with VBA in ArcGIS. Computer and Geosciences, 30, 6: 637-646., DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.010
  26. Munda G. (1995), Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-49997-5
  27. Munda G. (2008), Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy. New York: Springer-Verlag., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2
  28. Nijkamp P., Rietveld P., Voogd H. (1990), Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  29. Ravetz J. R. (2000), Integrated Assessment for Sustainability Appraisal in Cities and Regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 1: 31-64., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00037-2
  30. Rosenhead J., Mingers J. (2001), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  31. Rotmans J. (2000), An Integrated Planning Tool for Sustainable City. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 3: 265-76., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00039-1
  32. Saaty T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision in a Complex World. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
  33. Saaty T. L. (1992), Multicriteria Decision Making. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
  34. Sinclair A. J., Sims L., Spaling H. (2009), Community-based Approaches to Strategic Environmental Assessment: Lessons from Costa Rica. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 3: 147-156., DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.10.002
  35. Therivel R. (2008), Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action. London: Earthscan.
  36. van der Sluijs J. P. (2002), A Way Out of the Credibility Crisis of Models Used in Integrated Environmental Assessment. Futures, 34, 2: 133-146., DOI: 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00051-9
  37. Wiek A., Walter A. I. (2009), A Transdisciplinary Approach for Formalized Integrated Planning and Decision-making in Complex Systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 1: 360-370., DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.013



  1. Giovanna Acampa, Francesco Contino, Mariolina Grasso, Dario Ticali, PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2019 (ICCMSE-2019) pp. 160010 (DOI:10.1063/1.5138078)
  2. Camilla Mele, Rigenerazione urbana e sociale: il progetto "La Mia Crocetta" in TERRITORIO 70/2014 pp. 29, DOI: 10.3280/TR2017-070004
  3. Maria Cerreta, Daniele Cannatella, Giuliano Poli, Sabrina Sposito, Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2015 pp. 50 (ISBN:978-3-319-21409-2)

Girard Luigi Fusco, Maria Cerreta, Pasquale De Toro, Valutazioni integrate per scelte sostenibili in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1 Suppl./2014, pp. 111-141, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2014-S01006

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche