Click here to download

Intrinsic, insoluble dilemmas of deliberative democracy
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO  
Author/s: Salvatore Taranto 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  18 Pg. 29-46 FullText PDF:  527 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2013-003002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Today’s model of democracy, in keeping with the principle of the moral and legal autonomy of equally free individuals, has replaced the model of democracy of antiquity, as well as those of monarchy and of oligarchy. Modern society is familiar with numerous democratic formulae, which can be classified in three main methods of decision- making: voting, negotiating and deliberating. This latter version is based on the ideal that there is a collective reason that is capable of identifying the best public choice in a way that is both justified for and binding on everyone. To tell the truth, deliberative democracy encounters certain intrinsic, structural dilemmas that it cannot solve and that therefore give rise to serious doubts about this paradigm’s validity and functionality. Two aspects seem to be particularly complicated: the failure to identify the subject whose mind makes the collective decision and the need to make decisions that may not necessarily be rational.
Keywords: Salvatore Taranto, Democracy, Deliberation, Reason, Politics

  1. Alexy, Robert, [1978] 1998. Teoria dell’argomentazione giuridica. La teoria del discorso razionale come teoria della motivazione giuridica. Tr. it. Milano: Giuffrè.
  2. Apel, Karl-Otto, 1992. Etica della comunicazione. Milano: Jaca Book. Baird, Douglas G., Robert H., Gertner & Randal C., Picker, 1994. Game Theory and the Law. Cambridge, Mass. and London, England: Harvard University Press.
  3. Berlin, Isaiah, 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bessette, Joseph M., 1980. Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. In Robert A. Goldwin & William A. Schambra (a cura di), How Democratic is the Constitution?. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
  5. Besson, Samantha, & José Luis Martí, 2006. Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  6. Bifulco, Raffaele, 2011. Democrazia deliberativa. In Aa. Vv., Enciclopedia del diritto. Annali. Milano: Giuffrè. IV: 271-294.
  7. Bohman, James, & William Rehg, 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press. Cohen, Joshua, 1999. Reflections on Habermas on Democracy. Ratio Juris, 12, VI: 385-416., 10.1111/1467-9337.00132DOI: 10.1111/1467-9337.00132
  8. Comanducci, Paolo, 1994. Argomentare e negoziare: un confronto. Ragion pratica, 3, II: 215-218.
  9. Constant, Benjamin, [1872], 1982. Cours de politique constitutionnelle. Genève-Paris: Slatkine.
  10. Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian, 2007. Arrow’s Theorem in Judgment Aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 1: 19-33., 10.1007/S00355-006-0196-XDOI: 10.1007/S00355-006-0196-X
  11. Dryzek, John S., 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Eisenstadt, Samuel N., [1999] 2002. Paradossi della democrazia: verso democrazie illiberali?. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Elster, Jon, 1993. Argomentare e negoziare. Milano: Anabasi.
  14. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Finley, Moses I., 1973. Democracy Ancient and Modern. London: Chatto and Windus.
  16. Finnis, John, 1999. Natural Law and the Ethics of Discourse. Ratio Juris, 12, 4: 354-373., 10.1111/1467-9337.0013DOI: 10.1111/1467-9337.0013
  17. Gauthier, David, 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Gutmann, Amy, & Dennis Thompson, 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Habermas, Jürgen, 1994. Teoria della morale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  19. 2001. Verità e giustificazione. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  20. 2002. L’inclusione dell’altro. Studi di teoria politica. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  21. 2004. Etica del discorso. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  22. 2007. La condizione intersoggettiva. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  23. Held, David, [2006] 2007. Modelli di democrazia. Tr. it. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  24. Johnson, James, 1991. Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action. Political Theory, 19, 2: 181-201., 10.1177/0090591791019002003DOI: 10.1177/0090591791019002003
  25. Lively, Jack, 1975. Democracy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  26. Maniaci, Giorgio, 2009. Quale razionalità per la democrazia deliberativa?. Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche, 9: 267-313.
  27. Martí, José Luis, 2006. La república deliberativa. Una teoría de la democracia. Madrid-Barcelona: Marcial Pons.
  28. 2008. La democrazia deliberativa e i diritti a garanzia della procedura. Ragion pratica, 30, 1: 131-150., 10.1415/26950DOI: 10.1415/26950
  29. McCarthy, Thomas, 1992. Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics.
  30. In Craig Calhoun (a cura di), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  31. Miller, David, 2002. Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice. In David M. Estlund (a cura di), Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.
  32. Neumann, John von, & Oskar Morgenstern, 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  33. Nino, Carlos Santiago, 1997. La constitución de la democracia deliberativa. Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial. —, 1999. Diritto come morale applicata. Tr. it. Milano: Giuffrè.
  34. Pellegrino, Gianfranco 2004. Le radici storiche e teoriche della democrazia deliberativa. In Giancarlo Bosetti & Sebastiano Maffettone (a cura di), Democrazia deliberativa: cosa è. Roma: Luiss University Press.
  35. Pettit, Philip, 2004. A Dilemma for Deliberative Democrats. In Anne Van Aaken, Christian List & Christoph Luetge (a cura di), Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  36. Pintore, Anna, 2009. Procedure democratiche e democrazia deliberativa. A proposito di un libro di José Luis Martí. Diritto & Questioni Pubbliche, 9: 333-346.
  37. 2010. Democrazia e diritti. Sette studi analitici. Pisa: ETS.
  38. Popper, Karl Raimund, [1945] 2003. La società aperta e i suoi nemici. Platone totalitario. Tr. it. Roma: Armando.
  39. Rawls, John, 1997. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64, 3: 765-807., 10.2307/1600311DOI: 10.2307/1600311
  40. [1999] 2001. Il diritto dei popoli. Tr. it. Torino: Ed. di Comunità.
  41. 2001. Saggi. Dalla giustizia come equità al liberalismo politico. Torino: Ed. di Comunità.
  42. Schiavello, Aldo, 2010. Diritti umani e pluralismo tra argomentazione e negoziazione. Ragion pratica, 34, 1: 129-149., 10.1415/31851DOI: 10.1415/31851
  43. Viola, Francesco, 2006. La democracia deliberativa entre constitucionalismo y multiculturalismo. México: Unam.
  44. Waldron, Jeremy, 1993. Religious Contributions in Public Deliberation. San Diego Law Review, 30, 4: 817-848.
  45. Waldron, Jeremy, 1999a. Deliberation, Disagreement, and Voting. In Harold
  46. Hongju Koh & Ronald C. Slye, (a cura di), Deliberative Democracy & Human Rights. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
  47. Waldron, Jeremy, 1999b. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  48. Young, Iris Marion, 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Zagrebelsky, Gustavo, 2007. Imparare democrazia. Torino: Einaudi.

Salvatore Taranto, Intrinsic, insoluble dilemmas of deliberative democracy in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2013, pp. 29-46, DOI:10.3280/SD2013-003002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content