Click here to download

Spatial Justice: a new perspective for migration studies?
Journal Title: MONDI MIGRANTI 
Author/s: Adriano Cancellieri 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 121-136 FullText PDF:  98 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MM2014-001008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The cohabitation among different "social worlds" is increasingly a characteristic of urban spaces. This is mainly due to migrant flows that generated new processes of territorialization of difference. The dominant literature and rhetoric too often started from an assumed representation of difference in urban spaces "always" as something to assimilate, to deconstruct or to defend. Starting from the dissatisfaction towards these dominant representations, the article aims to examine the concept of "spatial justice", largely unexplored in the Italian context, as a possible lens to analyze the processes of territorialization of difference. Using this situated and processual perspective of justice, the attention is focused on the spatialities that are constantly produced and reproduced and on the territorial resources and bonds that could be mobilized or inhibited.
Keywords: Spatial justice, immigration, socio-spatial dialectic, exclusion, spatial agency, multi-scalarity

  1. Alietti A. (2012). Stigmatizzazione territoriale, stato di eccezione e quartieri multietnici: una riflessione critica a partire dal caso di Milano. In: Cancellieri A. e Scandurra G., a cura di, cit.
  2. Allport G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  3. Ambrosini M. (2012). ‘We are against a multi-ethnic society’: policies of exclusion at the urban level in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1-20,, 10.1080/01419870.2011.644312DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.644312
  4. Amin A. (2002). Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity. Environment and Planning A, 34, 6: 959-980,, 10.1068/a3537DOI: 10.1068/a3537
  5. Anderson E. (2004). The Cosmopolitan Canopy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595: 14-31,, 10.1177/0002716204266833DOI: 10.1177/0002716204266833
  6. Barrett M. e Phillips A., eds. (1992). Destabilizing Theory, Stanford: Stanford up.
  7. Baumann G. (1996). Contesting Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Boccagni P. (2013). What’s in a (Migrant) House? Changing Domestic Spaces, the Negotiation of Belonging and Home-making in Ecuadorian Migration. Housing, Theory and Society,, 10.1080/14036096.2013.867280DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2013.867280
  9. Bret B., Gervais-Lambony P., Hancock C. e Landy F., a cura di (2010). Justice et injustices spatiales. Paris: PU Paris Ouest.
  10. Brighenti A. (2008). Visuale, visibile, etnografico. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 1, 1: 91-113,, 10.3240/26001DOI: 10.3240/26001
  11. Brighenti A. e Mattiucci C. (2012). Visualising the riverbank. City, 1, 16: 221-234,, 10.1080/13604813.2012.662378222DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2012.662378222
  12. Burgess E.W. (1925). The Growth of the City. An Introduction to a Research Project. In: Park R.E., Burgess E.W. e McKenzie R.D., a cura di, cit.
  13. Cancellieri A. (2014). New Religious Spaces of Difference. Resources and Risks of the Italian new religious landscape. In: Marconi G. e Ostanel E., eds., cit.
  14. Cancellieri A. (2011). La città e le differenze. Battaglie per il senso del luogo e valorizzazione welfare space. Bollettino Società Geografica Italiana, 1: 83-91.
  15. Cancellieri A. (2010). Come sopravvivere alla differenza. Etnografia dei confini sociali in uno spazio multiculturale. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 1: 11-36,, 10.3240/31596DOI: 10.3240/31596
  16. Cancellieri A. (2010). Emergenze urbane e minoranze. Il ‘mondominio’ Hotel House. Il Mulino, Rivista on-line, 2 dicembre. Testo disponibile al sito: http:// www.rivistailmulino.it/news/newsitem/index/Item/News: news _item:784/.
  17. Cancellieri A. e Scandurra G., a cura di (2012). Tracce urbane. Alla ricerca della città. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Cancellieri A. (2013). Hotel House. Etnografia di un condominio multietnico. Trento: Professional Dreamers.
  18. Cancellieri A. e Ostanel E. (2014). The Struggle for Public Space: the Hypervisibility of Migrants in the Italian Urban Landscape. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, forthcoming.
  19. Cingolani P. (2006). L’imprevedibile familiarità della città: luoghi e percorsi significativi dei migranti nigeriani a Torino. In: Decimo e Sciortino, a cura di, cit.
  20. Colombo E. e Semi G., a cura di (2007). Multiculturalismo quotidiano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Cottino P. (2003). La città imprevista. Il dissenso nell’uso dello spazio urbano. Milano: Eleuthera.
  22. Cresswell T. (1996). In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  23. De Certeau M. (1990). L'invention du quotidien. Paris: Gallimard.
  24. Decimo F. e Sciortino G. a cura di (2006). Stranieri in Italia. Reti migranti. Bologna: il Mulino
  25. Deleuze G. e Guattari F. (2003). Millepiani. Capitalismo e schizofrenia. Roma: Cooper Castelvecchi.
  26. Deutsche R. (1996). Eviction: Art and Spatial Politics. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
  27. Dikeç M. (2001). Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and Planning A, 33, 10: 1785-1805,, 10.1068/a3467DOI: 10.1068/a3467
  28. Dikeç M. (2002). Police, politics and right to the city. GeoJournal, 58, 2-3: 91-98.
  29. Eve M. (2001). Una sociologia degli altri e un'altra sociologia: la tradizione di studio sull’immigrazione. Quaderni storici, 1: 233-260.
  30. Fava F. (2008). Tra iperghetto e banlieues, la nuova marginalità urbana: il caso dello Zen di Palermo. Vita e Pensiero, 2: 31-35.
  31. Fincher R. e Iveson K. (2012). Justice and Injustice in the City. Geographical Research. 50, 3: 231-241,, 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00742DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00742
  32. Fincher R. e Jacobs J.M., a cura di (1998). Cities of Difference. New York: The Guilford Press.
  33. Fischer C.S. (1975). Toward a Subcultural Theory of Urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80:1319-1341,, 10.1086/225993DOI: 10.1086/225993
  34. Florida R. (2003). L’ascesa della nuova classe creativa. Milano: Mondadori.
  35. Flusty S. (1994). Building Paranoia: The Proliferation of Interdictory Space and The Erosion of Spatial Justice. West Hollywood, CA: LA Forum for Architecture and Urban Design.
  36. Gans H. (1995). The war against the poor: The underclass and antipoverty policy. New York: Basic Books.
  37. Gibson K. (1998). Social Polarization and the Politics of Difference: Discourses in Collision or Collusion?. In: Fincher R. e Jacobs J., a cura di. cit.
  38. Gotham K.F. (2003). Toward an Understanding of the Spatiality of Urban Poverty: The Urban Poor as Spatial Actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 3: 723-727,, 10.1111/1468-2427.00478.GothamK.F.eBrumleyK.(2002).Usingspace:agencyandidentityinapublichousingdevelopment.City&Community,1,3:267-289,doi:10.1111/15406040.00023DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00478.GothamK.F.eBrumleyK.(2002).Usingspace:agencyandidentityinapublichousingdevelopment.City&Community,1,3:267-289,doi:10.1111/15406040.00023
  39. Hall S. e Jefferson T. (1992). Resistance Through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain. London: Hutchinson.
  40. Harvey D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  41. Harvey D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53: 23-40.
  42. hooks b. (1998). Elogio del margine. Razza, sesso e mercato culturale. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  43. Iveson K. (2011). Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city. City, 15, 2: 250-259,, 10.1080/13604813.2011.568723DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2011.568723
  44. La Cecla F. (2000). Perdersi. L’uomo senza ambiente. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  45. Lefebvre H. (1970). Il diritto alla città. Padova: Marsili.
  46. Lofland L. (1998). The Public Realm. Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Theory. Chicago: Aldine Transactions.
  47. Lussault M. (2009). De la lutte des classes à la lutte des places. Paris: Grasset.
  48. Maffi M. (1992). Nel mosaico della città. Differenze etniche e nuove culture in un quartiere di New York. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  49. Marconi G. e Ostanel E., eds. (2014). The Intercultural City: Migration, Minorities and the Management of Diversity. London: I.B. Tauris, forthcoming.
  50. Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13, 2-3: 185-197,, 10.1080/13604810902982177DOI: 10.1080/13604810902982177
  51. Marston S. (2000). The Social Construction of Scale. Progress in Human Geography, 25: 219-42,, 10.1191/030913200674086272DOI: 10.1191/030913200674086272
  52. Massey D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
  53. Mitchell D. (1997). The Annihilation of Space by Law: The Roots and Implications of Anti-Homeless Laws in the United States. Antipode, 29: 303-335,, 10.1111/1467-8330.00048DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00048
  54. Mitchell D. (2003). The Right to the City. New York: Guilford Press.
  55. Nancy J. L. (2002). La città lontana. Verona: Ombre Corte.
  56. Olzak S. e Nagel J., eds. (1986). Competitive Ethnic Relations. New York: Academic Press.
  57. Okin S.M. (2007). Diritti delle donne e multiculturalismo. Milano: Cortina.
  58. Ostanel E. e Cancellieri A. (2014). Ri-pubblicizzare la città: pratiche spaziali, culture e istituzioni. Territorio, 68.
  59. Park R.E., Burgess E.W. e McKenzie R.D., a cura di (1995). The City. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  60. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A. (2014). The movement of Spatial Justice. Mondi Migranti, 1: 7: 19.
  61. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A. (2010). Spatial justice: law and the geography of withdrawal. International Journal of Law in Context, 6, 3: 201-216,, 10.1017/S174455231000011DOI: 10.1017/S174455231000011
  62. Portes A. e Manning R. (1986). The Immigrant Enclave: Theory and Empirical Examples. In: Olzak S. e Nagel J., eds., cit. Pratt M.L. (1992). Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation, London-
  63. New York: Routledge.
  64. Pringle R. e Watson S. (1992). Women’s Interests’ and the Post Structuralist State. In: Barrett M. e Phillips A., eds., cit.
  65. Purcell M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant, GeoJournal, 58, 2-3: 99-108,, 10.1023/b:gejo.0000010829.62237.8fDOI: 10.1023/b:gejo.0000010829.62237.8f
  66. Raffestin C. (1984). Territorializzazione, deterritorializzazione, riterritorializzazione e informazione. In: Turco A., a cura di. cit.
  67. Ruiz-Tagle J. (2013). A Theory of Socio-spatial Integration: Problems, Policies and Concepts from a US Perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 2: 388-408,, 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01180.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01180.x
  68. Said E. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.
  69. Saint-Blancat C. e Cancellieri A. (2014). From Invisibility to Visibility? The appropriation of public space through a religious ritual. The Filipino procession of Santacruzan in Padua, Italy. Social and Cultural Geography, forthcoming,, 10.1080/14649365.2013.879494DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2013.879494
  70. Sandercock L. (1998). Towards Cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. London: John Wiley.
  71. Seamon D.A. (1979). A geography of the lifeworld : movement, rest and encounter. London: Croom Helm.
  72. Small M.L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  73. Smith D.M. (1997). Back to the good life: towards an enlarged conception of social justice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15:19 -35,, 10.1068/d150019DOI: 10.1068/d150019
  74. Smith N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. UK: Taylor & Francis.
  75. Soja E. (2010a). Seeking Spatial Justice. Minnesota: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
  76. Soja E. (2010b). The City and Spatial Justice. In: Bret B., Gervais-Lambony P., Hancock C. e Landy F., a cura di. cit.
  77. Soja E. (1980). Socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70, 2: 207-225,, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
  78. Stavrides S. (2010). Towards the City of Thresholds. Trento: Professionaldreamers.
  79. Strüver A. (2004). Boundaries under Construction: Linking Body Politics to Space. Espace, Populations, Sociétés, 9, 1: 121-130.
  80. Toubon J. e Messamah K. (1990). Centralité immigrée, le quartier de la Goutte d'or. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  81. Turco A., a cura di (1984). Regione e regionalizzazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  82. Valentine G. (2008). Living with Difference: Reflections on Geography of Encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 3: 323-337,, 10.1177/0309133308089372DOI: 10.1177/0309133308089372
  83. Wacquant L. (2008). Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. Wacquant L. (2007). Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality,
  84. Thesis Eleven, 91: 66-77,, 10.1177/0725513607082003DOI: 10.1177/0725513607082003
  85. Wacquant L. (1993). Urban Outcasts: Stigma and Division in the Black American Ghetto and the French Urban Periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17,, 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1993.tb00227.xDOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1993.tb00227.x
  86. Wirth L. (1938). Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1: 1-24,, 10.1086/217913DOI: 10.1086/217913
  87. Young I.M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton up.
  88. Zukin S. (2008). Consuming Authenticity: From Outposts of Difference to Means of Exclusion. Cultural Studies, 22, 5: 724-748,, 10.1080/09502380802245985DOI: 10.1080/09502380802245985

Adriano Cancellieri, Spatial Justice: a new perspective for migration studies? in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 1/2014, pp. 121-136, DOI:10.3280/MM2014-001008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content