Click here to download

Promoting engagement in chronic illness patients: a collaborative research pathway
Journal Title: PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE 
Author/s: Silvia Gilardi, Chiara Guglielmetti, Sara Casati, Paolo Monti 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  22 Pg. 58-79 FullText PDF:  138 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PDS2014-003004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Patient engagement is recognized as essential for the quality of services for chronic diseases. The paper aims to explore the socio-organizational dynamics associated with the promotion of patients’ engagement and their transformation from passive consumers of medical services to partner. We present a collaborative study conducted with two health care services of a large hospital in Northern Italy, where patients and healthcare personnel cooperated to evaluate and reorient the clinical pathways towards participated processes centered on the patient. Practices were analyzed through a revised version of proactive analysis (HFMEA) and the psycho-social analysis of decision nodes of the clinical pathway, applied in the context of focus groups with mixed composition (patients, physicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers). Results revealed different representations of the nature of engagement and its nature as a changing and unstable process. In addition, the study highlighted professional assumptions and values that can give rise to an apparent participation. The study offers indications for designing collaborative practices in managing clinical pathways.
Keywords: Chronic illness, patient engagement, participatory research, focus group, HFMEA.

  1. Bani U., Barile F. e Mazza U. (2013). La dimensione psicosociale nella cura della talassemia: una rassegna della letteratura [The psychosocial dimension in the treatment of thalassemia: a review of the literature]. Psicologia della Salute, 1: 5-26., 10.3280/PDS2013-00100DOI: 10.3280/PDS2013-00100
  2. Barello S., Graffigna G. and Vegni E. (2012). Patient engagement as an emerging challenge for healthcare services: mapping the literature. Nursing Research and Practice., 10.1155/2012/90593DOI: 10.1155/2012/90593
  3. Bertocchi S., Emiliani F., Potì S. e Palareti L. (2010). Diversi regimi terapeutici nel trattamento di bambini affetti da malattia emorragica congenita: processi di scelta e ricadute sul benessere psicosociale del paziente e della sua famiglia [Different regimens in the treatment of children with congenital haemorrhagic disease: processes of choice and impact on psychosocial well-being of the patient and his family]. Psicologia della Salute, 3: 65-90., 10.3280/PDS2010-00300DOI: 10.3280/PDS2010-00300
  4. Bodenheimer T., Wagner E.H. and Grumbach K. (2002). Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. Journal of American Medical Association, 288: 1909-1914., 10.1001/jama.288.15.190DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.15.190
  5. Brady T. J., Murphy L., O’Colmain B.J., Beauchesne D., Daniels B., Greenberg M., House M. and Chervin D. (2013). A meta-analysis of health status, health behaviors, and health care utilization outcomes of the chronic disease self-management program. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10: 120112., 10.5888/pcd10.12011DOI: 10.5888/pcd10.12011
  6. Cahill J.O. (1998). Patient participation – a review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7 (2), 119-128., 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00132.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00132.
  7. Cahill J. (1996). Patient participation: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(3), 561-571., 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22517.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22517.
  8. Casati S., Monti P. and Bonino F. (2010). From actors to authors: A first account about the involvement of patients in the informed consent governance of a major Italian translational research hospital. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 33 (3): 231-240., 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e5630DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e5630
  9. Chiu L.F. (2006). Critical reflection. More than nuts and bolts. Action Research, 4(2): 183-203.
  10. Coulter A. (2011). Engaging patients in healthcare. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. Coulter A. (2012). Patient engagement-what works? The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 35: 80-89., 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318249e0fDOI: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318249e0f
  11. Coulter A., Parsons S. and Askham J. (2008). Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
  12. Cunliffe A.L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56 (8): 983-1003., 10.1177/0018726703056800DOI: 10.1177/0018726703056800
  13. Cunliffe A.L. (2003). Reflexive inquiry in organizational research: questions and possibilities. Human Relations, 56 (8): 983-1003., 10.1177/0018726703056800DOI: 10.1177/0018726703056800
  14. Davis R. E., Jacklin R., Sevdalis N. and Vincent C. A. (2007). Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement? Health Expectations, 10 (3): 259-267., 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.
  15. Department of Health (United Kingdom) (2001). The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management in the 21st century. London: Stationery Office.
  16. DeRosier J., Stalhandske E., Bagian J.P. and Nudell T. (2002). Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: the VA National Center for Patient Safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 28 (5): 248-267.
  17. Doherty W.J. and Mendenhall T.J. (2006). Citizen health care: A model for engaging patients, families, and communities as coproducers of health. Families, Systems, & Health, 24: 251-263., 10.1037/1091-7527.24.3.25DOI: 10.1037/1091-7527.24.3.25
  18. Duggleby W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15: 832-840., 10.1177/104973230427391DOI: 10.1177/104973230427391
  19. Edgman-Levitan S. (2013). Partnering with Patients, Families, and Communities For health: a global imperative. Report of the patients and family engagement working group. Retrieved from: www.wish-qatar.org/app/media/380Fisher E.B., Brownson C.A., O’Toole M.L., Shetty G., Anwuri V.V. and Glasgow R.E. (2005). Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes. American
  20. Journal of Public Health, 95 (9): 1523-1535., 10.2105/AJPH.2005.06608DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.06608
  21. Galuppo L., Gorli M. and Ripamonti S. (2011). Playing dissymmetry in action research: the role of power and differences in promoting participative knowledge and change. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24 (2): 147-164., 10.1007/s11213-010-9181-DOI: 10.1007/s11213-010-9181-
  22. Guglielmetti C., Gilardi S., Casati S. e Monti P. (2012). Divenire partner del team di cura: qualità del servizio e senso di appartenenza negli adulti con Beta Talassemia Major [Partnering with the health care team: quality of service and sense of belonging in adults with Beta Thalassemia Major]. Psicologia della Salute, 1: 87-109., 10.3280/PDS2012-00100DOI: 10.3280/PDS2012-00100
  23. Greenhalgh T. (2009). Chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 338: 629-631., 10.1136/bmj.b4DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4
  24. Gruman J., Rovner M.H., French M.E., Jeffress D., Sofaer S., Shaller D. and Prager D.J. (2010). From patient education to patient engagement: Implications for the field of patient education.Patient education and Counseling, 78: 350-356., 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.00DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.00
  25. Guadagnoli E. and Ward P. (1998). Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science and Medicine, 47 (3): 329-339., 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00059-
  26. Heron J. and Reason P. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry. Research with rather than on people. In Reason P. and Bradbury H. (eds.), Handbook of Action Research:Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
  27. Mendenhall T.J. and Doherty W.J. (2007). Partners in diabetes: Action research in a primary care setting. Action Research, 5: 378-406., 10.1177/147675030708372DOI: 10.1177/147675030708372
  28. Protheroe J., Rogers A., Kennedy A.P., Macdonald W. and Lee V. (2008). Promoting patient engagement with self-management support information: a qualitative meta synthesis of processes influencing uptake. Implementation Science, 3 (1): 44., 10.1186/1748-5908-3-4DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-4
  29. Reason P. and Bradbury H. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (second edition). London: Sage.
  30. Thompson A.G.H. (2007). The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Social Science and Medicine, 64: 1297-1310., 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.00
  31. Wilson P.M. (2001). A policy analysis of the Expert Patient in the United Kingdom: selfcare as an expression of pastoral power? Health & Social Care in the Community, 9: 134-142., 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00289.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00289.
  32. Wilson P.M., Kendall S. and Brooks F. (2006). Nurses’ responses to expert patients: the rhetoric and reality of self-management in long-term conditions: a grounded theory study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43 (7): 803-818., 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.10.01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.10.01
  33. Wilson P.M., Kendall S. and Brooks F. (2007). The Expert Patients Programme: a paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance. Health & Social Care in the Community, 15 (5): 426-438., 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00701.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00701.
  34. World Health Organization (2005). Health promotion in hospitals: Evidence and quality management. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Silvia Gilardi, Chiara Guglielmetti, Sara Casati, Paolo Monti, Promoting engagement in chronic illness patients: a collaborative research pathway in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 3/2014, pp. 58-79, DOI:10.3280/PDS2014-003004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content