Click here to download

The Spatial Dimensions Of Personal Networks Among Poor Urban São Paulo and Salvador
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Author/s: Eduardo Marques 
Year:  2014 Issue: 105 Language: English 
Pages:  15 Pg. 102-116 FullText PDF:  246 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2014-105007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The majority of studies about networks and space analyze cities of the Global North, and only some investigations explore the effects of urban segregation in network production. This paper addresses the issue using research results about 361 personal networks of poor individuals in two Brazilian metropolises - São Paulo and Salvador. Physical proximity is relatively unimportant for the middle classes, but is central for the urban poor. Both segregation and localism have negative impacts on the presence of more socially integrated networks. Some types of networks contribute to integrate poor individuals, but they tend to be rarer exactly among the poorer individuals, creating strong circularity in inequality reproduction. This article explores the correlates of networks' spatial dimensions - localism and the presence of neighbors.
Keywords: Personal networks, Poverty, Neighborhood, Localim, Metropolises, Brazil.

  1. Bastani S. (2007). Family comes first: Men’s and women’s personal networks in Tehran. Social Networks, 29: 357–374., 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00
  2. Beggs J. (1996). Revising the rural-urban contrast: personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings. Rural sociology, 61: 306-325., 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00622.DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00622.
  3. Bichir R., Marques E. (2012). Poverty and sociability in Brazilian metropolises: comparing poor people’s personal networks in São Paulo and Salvador. Connections, 1: 20-32., 10.1177/016224390628754DOI: 10.1177/016224390628754
  4. Bidart C., Lavenu D. (2005). Evolution of personal networks and life events. Social Networks, 4: 359-376., 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.00
  5. Bidart C. (2009). En busca Del contenido de las redes sociales: los ‘motivos’ de las relaciones. Redes - Revista hispana para elanálisis de redes sociales, 7: 178-202.
  6. Blokland T. (2003). Urban Bonds. London: Basil Blackwell.
  7. Blokland T., Savage M. (2008). Networked urbanism: social capital in the city. London: Ashgate Ed.
  8. Briggs X. (2001). Ties that bind, bridge and constrain: social capital and segregation in the American Metropolis. Paper presented at the Seminar: Segregation and the city, Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
  9. Briggs X. (2003). Bridging networks, social capital and racial segregation in America. Cambridge: KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
  10. Briggs X. (2005a) Social capital and segregation in the United States. In Varady D. Desegregating the city. Albany: Suny Press.
  11. Briggs X. (ed). (2005b). The Geography of opportunity: Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  12. Campbell K., Lee B. (1992). Sources of Personal Neighbor Networks: Social Integration, Need, or Time? Social Forces, 4: 1077-1100.
  13. Curley A. (2008). Deconcentrating poverty: program effects on neighborhood diversity and social cohesion. Conference paper for Housing Studies Association. York, UK: University of York.
  14. Curley A. (2009). Draining of gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of social and personal relationships, 2-3: 227-247., 10.1177/026540750910671DOI: 10.1177/026540750910671
  15. Degenne A. (2009). Tipos de interacciones, formas de confianza y relaciones. Redes – Revista hispana para elanálisis de redes sociales, 3: 63-91.
  16. Degenne A., Forsé M. (1994). Les réseaux sociaux. Paris: Armand Colin.
  17. Doreian P., Conti N. (2012). Social context, spatial structure and social network structure. Social Networks, 34: 32-46., 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.09.002.FerrandA.(2002)Lascomunidadeslocalescomoestructurasmeso.RevistaHispanaparaElAnálisisdeRedesSociales,4DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.09.002.FerrandA.(2002)Lascomunidadeslocalescomoestructurasmeso.RevistaHispanaparaElAnálisisdeRedesSociales,4
  18. Fischer C., Shavit Y. (1995). National differences in network density: Israel and the United States. Social Networks, 2: 129-145., 10.1016/0378-8733(94)00251-DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(94)00251-
  19. Fischer C. (2011). Still connected: family and friends in America since 1970. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  20. Freeman L. (2001). The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties: An Explanatory Analysis, Journal of the American Planning Association, 1: 69-77., 10.1080/0194436010897635DOI: 10.1080/0194436010897635
  21. Grosseti M. (2007). Are French networks different? Social Networks, 3: 391-404., 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00
  22. Grosseti M. (2009). Que es una relación social? Un conjunto de mediaciones diádicas. Redes - Revista Hispana para el análisis de redes sociales, 2: 44-62.
  23. Kleit R., Carnegie N. (2011). Integrated or isolated? The impact of public housing redevelopment on social network homophily. Social Networks, 33: 152-165., 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.01.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.01.00
  24. Jariego I. (2003). A general typology of the personal networks of immigrants with less than 10 years living in Spain. XXIII Sunbelt Conference.
  25. Lee T. (1980). The Resilience of Social Networks to Changes in Mobility and Propinquity Social Networks, 2: 423-435
  26. Lee R., Ruan D., Lai G. (2005). Social structure and support networks in Beijing and Hong Kong. Social Networks, 27: 249-274., 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.00
  27. Lonkila M. (2010). The importance of work-related social ties in post-soviet Russia: the role of co-workers in the personal networks in St. Petersburg and Helsinki. Connections, 1: 46-56., 10.1080/0966813050012645DOI: 10.1080/0966813050012645
  28. Lubbers M., Molina J., Lerner J., Brandes U., Ávila J., McCarty C. (2010). Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks 32: 91-104., 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.05.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.05.00
  29. Marques E. (2012). Opportunities and deprivation in the Global South: Poverty, segregation and social networks in São Paulo. London: Ashgate Pub.
  30. Marques E. (2012). Do social networks help overcoming urban poverty, in spite of segregation? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 5: 958-79., 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01143.DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01143.
  31. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415-444., 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.41DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.41
  32. Molina J., Lerner J., Mestres S. (2008). Patrones de cambio de las redes personales de inmigrantes em Cataluña. Redes - Revista hispana para El análisis de redes sociales, 15: 48-61.
  33. Moya E., Marques E. (2013). Échanges sociaux et mécanismes relationnels à São Paulo et Salvador. Brésil, 3: 149-172.
  34. Mustered S., Murie A., Kestellot C. (2006). Neighborhoods of poverty: urban social exclusion and integration in Europe. London: Palgrave Ed.
  35. Ruan D., Freeman L., Dai X., Pan Y., Zhang W. (1997). On the changing structure of social networks in urban China. Social Networks, 19: 75-89., 10.1353/sof.2005.0053SchweizerT.,SchneggM.BerzbornS.(1998).PersonalnetworksandsocialsupportinamultiethniccommunityofsouthernCalifornia.SocialNetworks,20:1-21.doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00304-DOI: 10.1353/sof.2005.0053SchweizerT.,SchneggM.BerzbornS.(1998).PersonalnetworksandsocialsupportinamultiethniccommunityofsouthernCalifornia.SocialNetworks,20:1-21.doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00304-
  36. Small M. (2009). Unanticipated gains: origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Uehara E. (1990). Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support. American Journal of Sociology, 1: 521-557., 10.1086/22957DOI: 10.1086/22957
  38. Wellman B. (1979). The community question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 5: 1201-1231., 10.1086/22690DOI: 10.1086/22690
  39. Wellman B. (ed.) (1999). Networks in the Global Village. Boulder: Westview Press.
  40. Wellman B. (2001). The persistence and transformation of Community: from neighborhood groups to social networks. Toronto. Internet: http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman/publications/lawcomm/lawcomm7.PDF
  41. Wellman B. (2007). Editorial: The network is personal: Introduction to a special issue of Social Networks. Social Networks, 29: 349-356., 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.01.00
  42. Wilson W. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

Eduardo Marques, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 105/2014, pp. 102-116, DOI:10.3280/SUR2014-105007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content