Click here to download

70 Years’ Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective
Author/s: Ernest R. Alexander 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  14 Pg. 5-18 FullText PDF:  125 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SCRE2015-001001
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This survey, a subjective critical review of ‘planning theory’ as it evolved since the mid- 20th century, has three parts. The first is a condensed account of the emergence of three distinct schools of thought: the radical-communicative, post-structuralist, and institutionalist streams. In the second part each stream is represented reviewing a typical book: Friedmann’s (2011) Insurgencies, Gunder and Hillier’s (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less, and Webster and Lai’s (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets. The last part argues the author’s position - there is no ‘planning’, only diverse planning practices - and develops its implications for planning theory and practice.
Keywords: Planning theory; communicative planning; post-structuralist planning.

  1. Adams D. and Tiesdell S., 2010, «Planners as Market Actors: Rethinking Statemarket Relations in Land and Property». Planning Theory & Practice, 2, 11: 187-207., DOI: 10.1080/14649351003759631
  2. Alexander E.R., 1982, «If Planning isn’t Everything, Maybe it’s Something». Town Planning Review, 52, 2: 131-142.
  3. Alexander E. R., 1987, «Planning as Development Control: Is that all Urban Planning is for?». Town Planning Review, 58, 4: 453-467.
  4. Alexander E.R., 1992, Approaches to Planning: Introducing current planning theories, concepts and issues. Montreaux: Gordon & Breach.
  5. Alexander E.R., 1995, How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
  6. Alexander E.R., 1998, «Doing the Impossible: Notes for a General Theory of Planning ». Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 5: 667-680.
  7. Alexander E.R., 2001, «A Transaction-cost Theory of Land Use Planning and Development Control». Town Planning Review, 72, 1: 45-76.
  8. Alexander E.R., 2004, «Book Review: Webster and Lai (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities». Planning Theory, 3, 2:
  9. 173-179., DOI: 10.1177/1473095204044780.AlexanderE.R.,2005,«WhatdoPlannersNeedtoKnow?IdentifyingNeede
  10. Competencies, Methods and Skills». Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 2: 91-106.
  11. Alexander E.R., 2006, «Institutional Design for Sustainable Development». Town Planning Review, 77, 1: 1-28., DOI: 10.3828/tpr.77.1.2
  12. Alexander E.R., 2010, «Introduction: Does Planning Theory Affect Practice, and if so, How?». Planning Theory, 9, 2: 99-107., DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357862
  13. Alexander E.R., 2011, «Book Review: Gunder and Hillier (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less». Planning Theory, 10, 4: 379-382., DOI: 10.1177/1473095211401731
  14. Alexander E.R., 2013a, «Book Review: Friedmann (2011) Insurgencies». Planning Theory, 12, 1: 104-106., DOI: 10.1177/1473095264862597
  15. Alexander E.R., 2013b, Forbidden Fruit? – The Expert Planner: A Post-postmodernist Take on Planners in Spatial Planning and Development Control. Presented at the AESOP/ACSP Joint Congress 2013, Dublin, 15-19 July.
  16. Alexander E.R., 2014, «Land-property Markets and Planning: A Special Case». Land Use Policy, 41: 533-540., DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.009
  17. Alexander E.R., Mazza L., Moroni S., 2012, «Planning Without Plans: Nomocracy or Teleocracy for Social-spatial Ordering». Progress in Planning, 77, 2: 37-87., DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.12.001
  18. Beauregard R.A., 1996, «Commentary - Advocating Preeminence: Anthologies as Politics». In Mandelbaum S.J., Mazza L. and Burchell R.W. (eds.), Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR – Rutgers The State University of New Jersey: 105-110.
  19. Bolan R.S., 1996, «Planning and Institutional Design». in Mandelbaum S.J., Mazza L., Burchell R.W. (eds.), Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR – Rutgers The State University of New Jersey: 497-513.
  20. Brunetta G., Moroni S., 2012, Contractual Communities in the Self-Organizing City: Freedom, Creativity, Subsidiarity. Dordrecht: Springer.
  21. Buitelaar E., 2009, «Zoning, More than Just a Tool: Explaining Houston’s Regulatory Practice». European Planning Studies, 17, 7: 1049-1065., DOI: 10.1080/09654310902949588
  22. Chiodelli F., 2012, «Repoliticising Space through Technical Rules». Planning Theory, 11: 115-127., DOI: 10.1177/1473095211420839
  23. Crosta P.L., 1996, «Connecting Knowledge with Action in the Interactive Process of Planning: What Knowledge is Relevant and with whose Actions should we be Concerned?». Planning Theory, 16: 104-122.
  24. Davidoff P., Reiner T.A., 1962, «A Choice Theory of Planning». Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28: 103-115., DOI: 10.1080/01944366208979427
  25. Ellis C., 2005, «Planning Methods and Good City Form». Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 2: 138-147.
  26. Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2002, The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London: Routledge.
  27. Friedmann J., 1973, Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
  28. Friedmann J., 1978, «The Epistomology of Social Practice: A Critique of Objective Knowledge». Theory & Society, 6: 75-92., DOI: 10.1007/BF01566158
  29. Friedmann J., 1987, Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton NJ: Princeton U.P. Friedmann J., 2011, Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
  30. Ganapati S., 2007, «An Istitutional Analysis of the Evolution of Housign Cooperatives in India». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 155-174.
  31. Gualini E., 2001, Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions. Aldershot, Hamps: Ashgate.
  32. Gunder M., Hillier J., 2009, Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
  33. Habermas J., 1981, Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Band I Handlungsrationalität und Gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  34. Healey P., 2006, «The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning ». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 61-87.
  35. Healey P., 2007, «On the Project of ‘Institutional Transformation’ in the Planning Field: Commenting on the Contributors». Planning Theory, 4, 3: 301-310., DOI: 10.1177/1473095205058498
  36. Hijdra A., Woltjer J., Arts J., 2014, «Value Creation in Capital Waterway Projects: Application of a Transaction Cost and Transaction Benefit Framework for the Miami River and the New Orleans Inner Harbor Navigation Canal». Land Use Policy, 38, 1: 91-103., DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.024
  37. Lyotard J-F., 1979, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  38. Marcusen A., 2000, «Planning as Craft and as Philosophy». In Rodwin L., Sanyal B. (eds.), The Profession of City Planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey: 261-274.
  39. Matthews T., 2013, «Institutional Perspectives on Operationalising Climate Adaptation through Planning». Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 2: 198-210., DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2013.781208
  40. Mazza L., 1995, «Technical Knowledge, Practical Reason and the Planner’s Responsibility ». Town Planning Review, 66, 4: 389-410.
  41. Mazza L., 2002, «Technical Knowledge and Planning Actions». Planning Theory, 1,1: 11-26., DOI: 10.1177/147309520200100102
  42. Moroni S., 2007, La Città del Liberalismo Attivo. Torino: CittàStudi.
  43. Moroni S., 2010a, «Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Land Use Regulation: Towards Nomocracy». Planning Theory, 9, 2: 137-155., DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357868
  44. Moroni S., 2010b, «An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions and a Dynamic Approach to Reform». Planning Theory, 9, 4: 1-23., DOI: 10.1177/1473095210368778
  45. Raja S., Verma N., 2010, «Got Perspective? A Theoretical View of Fiscal Impact Analysis». Planning Theory, 9, 2: 126-136., DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357866
  46. Teitz M.B., 2007, «Planning and the New Institutionalisms». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 17-35.
  47. Verma N., 2007, «Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Enquiry». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 1-14.
  48. Vickers Sir G., 1968, Value Systems and Social Process. New York: Basic Books.
  49. Webster C., Lai L.W-C., 2003, Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  50. Woltjer J., 2000, Consensus Planning: The Relevance of Communicative Planning Theory in Dutch Infrastructure Development. Aldershot UK: Ashgate.

Ernest R. Alexander, in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2015, pp. 5-18, DOI:10.3280/SCRE2015-001001


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content