Click here to download

Social construction of migration between service industry and migrant users: doing fieldwork "within" policies
Journal Title: MONDI MIGRANTI 
Author/s: Federica Tarabusi 
Year:  2014 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 93-108 FullText PDF:  56 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MM2014-003006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


How can we investigate migration through the lens of local policy? What strategies and negotiation skills are required to ethnographically explore the everyday interactions between social practitioners and migrant "users"? Based on ethnographic experiences carried out in the Emilia-Romagna region, the paper aims to discuss particular research methods developed in doing fieldwork within the institutional arrangements of local organizations, actors and policies which played a significant role in immigrant incorporation into the receiving society. Debating multiple negotiations and strategies adopted to investigate public policies "from below", the paper focuses on the issues of obtaining access to the migrant service industry and gaining trust in relations with local practitioners and migrants who daily negotiate rights and resources within the multicultural arena. While the ethnographer finds him/herself in the difficult position of collecting data by going deep into the contrasts emerging within the field, ethnographic work calls for critical insight into "politics of identity" taking into account how multiple informant’s ideas and expectations can shape anthropological knowledge. Facing multiple dilemmas, the researcher gains a privileged position where he/she can discover social practitioners’ languages, ambivalent representations and working experiences, as well as investigate the processes through which local policies can be translated into discriminatory practices toward migrants, contributing to normalize their symbolic exclusion in multicultural Italian society.
Keywords: Ethnography, policies, service industry; migrant users, field.

  1. Baumann G. (1996). Contesting Culture: Discourses of Identity in Multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bourdieu P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
  3. Brettell C., a cura di (1993). When They Read What We Write: The Politics of Ethnography. London: Bergin & Garvey.
  4. Campomori F. (2008). Immigrazione e cittadinanza locale. La governance dell’integrazione in Italia. Roma: Carocci.
  5. Cappelleto F., a cura di (2009). Vivere l'etnografia. Firenze: Seid.
  6. Caponio T. (2005), Policy Networks and Immigrants’Associations in Italy: The Cases of Milan, Bologna and Naples. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 5: 931-950.
  7. Falteri P., Giacalone, F., a cura di (2011). Migranti involontari. Giovani ‘stranieri’ tra percorsi urbani e aule scolastiche. Perugia: Morlacchi Editore.
  8. Fabietti U., a cura di (1998). Etnografia e culture. Antropologi, informatori e politiche dell'identità. Roma: Carocci.
  9. Fassin D. (2006). Un ethos compassionevole. La sofferenza come linguaggio l’ascolto come politica. In: Quaranta I., a cura di, cit.
  10. Ferrari M., Rosso C. (2008). Interazioni precarie. Il dilemma dell’integrazione dei migranti nelle politiche sociali locali:caso di Brescia. Messina: Cirsdig.
  11. Gazit N., Maoz-Shai Y. (2010). Studying-up and Studying-across: Researching Governmental Violence Organizations at Home. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 3: 275-295.
  12. Geertz C. (1988). Antropologia Interpretativa. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Giordano C. (1998). Dal punto di vista del progetto. Dinamiche etnografiche in un contesto di “sviluppo”. In: Fabietti U., a cura di, cit.
  14. Giuffrè M., Riccio B. (2012). Prospettive transnazionali ed etnografie multilocali in Italia. L'Uomo, 1-2: 309-319.
  15. Grillo R.D., Pratt. J., a cura di (2006). Le politiche del riconoscimento delle differenze.Multiculturalismo all’italiana. Rimini: Guaraldi.
  16. Gupta A., Ferguson J. (1997). Culture, power, place: explorations in critical anthropology. London: Duke University Press.
  17. Herzfeld M. (1997). Cultural Intimacy. Social Poetics in The Nation-State. New York: Routledge. Jackson A., a cura di (1987). Anthropology at home, Asa. London: Tavistock.
  18. Matera V., a cura di (2013). De-constructing the field. Archivio Antropologico del Mediterraneo, 15, 2.
  19. Mosse D. (2006). Anti-social Anthropology? Objectivity, Objection, and the Ethnography of Public Policy and Professional Communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 12, 4: 935-956.
  20. Nader L. (1969). Up the Anthropologist: perspectives gained from studying up. In: Hymes D., a cura di, Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon books.
  21. Olivier de Sardan J.P. (2009). La politica del campo. Sulla produzione di dati in antropologia. In: Cappelleto F., a cura di, cit.: 27-63.
  22. Ong A. (2006). Da rifugiati a cittadini. Milano: Cortina.
  23. Palumbo B. (2010). Classificare, agire, disciplinare. Riflessioni critiche su alcune tendenze dell’antropologia politica contemporanea. Illuminazioni: 36-110.
  24. Pazzagli I.G. (2002). L’arcipelago dei servizi: uno sguardo sulle dimensioni organizzative. In: Sgrignoli A., a cura di, cit.
  25. Pazzagli I.G., Tarabusi F. (2009). Un doppio sguardo. Etnografia delle interazioni tra servizi e adolescenti di origine straniera. Rimini: Guaraldi.
  26. Peirano M. (1998). When anthropology is at home: the Different Contexts of a Single Discipline. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27: 105-128.
  27. Però D. (2007). Inclusionary Rhetoric, Exclusionary Practices: Left-Wing Politics and Migrants in Italy. Oxford-New York: Berghahn.
  28. Piasere L. (2009). L’etnografia come esperienza. In: Cappelleto F., cit.: 65-95.
  29. Quaranta I., a cura di (2006). Sofferenza Sociale. Annuario di Antropologia, 8. Roma: Meltemi.
  30. Riccio B. (2006). Toubab e “vu cumprà”. Le percezioni italiane dei trans-migranti senegalesi e la critica afro-mussulmana della società italiana. In: Grillo R.D., Pratt J., a cura di, cit.
  31. Rossi C. (2003). Antropologia culturale. Appunti di metodo per la ricerca nei mondi contemporanei. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  32. Salih R. (2006). Riconoscere la differenza, rafforzare l’esclusione: un “Consultorio per le donne migranti e i loro bambini” in Emilia-Romagna. In: Grillo R.D, Pratt J., a cura di, cit.
  33. Sgrignoli A., a cura di (2002). Donne migranti: dall’accoglienza alla formazione. Un’analisi culturale dentro e fuori i servizi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  34. Sòrgoni B., a cura di (2011). Etnografia dell'accoglienza. Rifugiati e richiedenti asilo a Ravenna. Roma: Cisu.
  35. Shore C., Wright S., a cura di (1997). Anthropology of policy: perspectives on governance and power. London: Routledge.
  36. Shore C., Wright S., Però D., a cura di (2011). Policy Worlds: Anthropology and Analysis of Contemporary Power. Oxford: Berghahn.
  37. Stolcke V. (1995). Talking culture: new boundaries, new rhetorics of exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology, 36, 1: 1-24.
  38. Strathern M. (1987). The limits of auto-anthropology. In: Jackson, cit: 16-37. Tarabusi F. (2014). Politiche dell’accoglienza, pratiche della differenza. Servizi e migrazioni sotto la lente delle politiche pubbliche. Archivio Antropologico del Mediterraneo, 16, 1: 45-61.
  39. Tarabusi F. (2010). Dentro le politiche. Servizi, progetti, operatori: sguardi antropologici. Rimini: Guaraldi.
  40. Vertovec S. (2011). The Cultural Politics of Nation and Migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40: 241-256.
  41. Vertovec S. (2007). Introduction: new directions in the anthropology of migration and multiculturalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29, 6: 961-978.
  42. Wikan U. (2009). Oltre le parole. Il potere della risonanza. In: Cappelleto F., a cura di, cit.: 97-130.

Federica Tarabusi, Social construction of migration between service industry and migrant users: doing fieldwork "within" policies in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 3/2014, pp. 93-108, DOI:10.3280/MM2014-003006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content