Dealing with complexity in a simple way: How visualization boosts understanding in learning process. The Z Generation case

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori Barbara Bertagni
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/137 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 15 P. 201-2015 Dimensione file 189 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2015-137012
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In today’s word, the ability to assimilate and apply knowledge effectively is a key competence very relevant for employability. In the knowledge age, people need to be able to learn quickly and incessantly. As educators, we have to rethink tools, methodologies, setting and pace in education in order to really help people improving their competencies all life-long. Interactive edugraphics combining knowledge visualizations, illustrations, text, and images together are an interesting and engaging way to effectively facilitate learning people from different fields, cultures, cognitive styles, level of knowledge. Visualization is a powerful approach both for general education and for training. Especially when we face the education of the young people growing up in the digital word, visualization is strategic - as highlighted by the case of a Zed Generation girl, Sophie (that also co-authored a paragraph of the present article). The educational approach for the 21st century needs to be more learner-centered, interactive, customizable, blended - combining activities technology-based and experiences in a team, like in the flipped classroom. In such a scenario, augmented reality tools are becoming very relevant - like in the e-REAL labs that are briefly introduced.

Nel mondo odierno l’abilità di acquisire ed applicare il sapere in modo efficace è una competenza chiave molto rilevante per l’accesso al mondo del lavoro. Nella società della conoscenza, le persone devono essere capaci di imparare rapidamente ed costantemente. In quanto educatori, dobbiamo ripensare gli strumenti, le metodologie, il setting ed il ritmo in ambito educativo per riuscire davvero ad aiutare le persone a potenziare le loro competenze lungo tutto l’arco della loro vita. Gli edugraphics interattivi - che combinano visualizzazione della conoscenza, illustrazioni, testo ed immagini - sono un modo interessante e coinvolgente per facilitare il processo di apprendimento di persone provenienti da diversi ambiti, culture, con differenti stili cognitivi e diversi livelli di competenza. La visualizzazione è un approccio straordinario sia per l’educazione generale che per la formazione professionale. La visualizzazione è uno strumento strategico, soprattutto nei processi educativi indirizzati alle giovani generazioni cresciute nel mondo digitale - come evidenziato dal caso di Sophie, ragazza della generazione Z (che è anche coautrice di un paragrafo del presente articolo). L’approccio educativo È opportuno che nel XXI secolo l’approccio educativo sia centrato sulla persona che apprende, interattivo, personalizzato - integrando attività basate sulle tecnologie ad esperienze in gruppo, come nel caso dell’insegnamento capovolto. In questo scenario, gli strumenti legati alla realtà aumentata sono sempre più importanti - come nel caso dei laboratori e-REAL che sono brevemente presentati.

Keywords:Generazione Z, e-REAL, edugraphic, visualizzazione della conoscenza, insegnamento capovolto, apprendimento visuale

  1. Agarwal A. (2015). The Future of Education. The Impact of Teaching. In: World Economic Forum, Mapping the Future: Making the Outlook on the Global Agenda. Geneva: WEF.
  2. Alexander E., Bresciani S., Eppler M.J. (2014). How Visual Restrictiveness Affects Group Communication Effectiveness: Experimental Evidence. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design (ICCMTD), 24-26 April 2014. Istanbul: Turkey.
  3. Alexander E., Eppler M.J., Bresciani S. (2013). Knowledge Scaffolding: A Classification of Visual Structures for Knowledge Communication in Teams. New York: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies IKNOW. New York.
  4. Amicucci F., Cipriani E., Ravazzani S. (2012). Le arti nella formazione tra visual thinking, mappe concettuali e stimoli visivi. In: “FOR”, vol. 93.
  5. Appiano A. (1993). Comunicazione visiva. Apparenza, realtà, rappresentazione. Torino: Utet.
  6. Arnheim R. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
  7. Arnheim R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception. A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
  8. Bergman J., Sams A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom. Washington, D.C.: Iste.
  9. Bergman J., Sams A. (Eds.)(2014). Flipped Learning. Washington, D.C.: Iste.
  10. Bergström B. (2012). Essentials of Visual Communication. London: King.
  11. Bertagni B. (2014). Online Learning. Trends and Data About X-Y-Z Generations. Research Paper. Bern and Turin: Logos Knowledge Network.
  12. Bertagni B., La Rosa M., Salvetti F., Eds. (2006). Società della conoscenza e formazione.
  13. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Bertagni B., La Rosa M., Salvetti F., Eds. (2010). Learn How to Learn! Knowledge Society, Education and Training. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Bresciani S., Eppler M.J. (2010). “Glocalizing” Visual Communication in Organizations: When and How to Adapt Visual Communication to Local Standards. In:
  15. Bertagni B., La Rosa M., Salvetti F. (Eds.), “Glocal” Working. Living and Working Across the World with Cultural Intelligence. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  16. Bretzmann J., Ed. (2013). Flipping 2.0. Practical Strategies for Flipping Your Class. New Berlin, Wis.: The Bretzmann Group.
  17. Buzzan T. and B. (2010). The Mind Map Book, BBC.
  18. Changeux J.P., Chavaillon J. (1996). Origins of the Human Brain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  19. Damasio A. (2012). Self Comes to Mind. London: Vintage.
  20. Debray R. (1992). Vie et mort de l’image, Paris: Gallimard.
  21. Dziuban C., Moskal P., Hartman J. (2004) Blended Learning in Educause Center for Applied Learning Research bulletin, n.7.
  22. Edward R. Tufte (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
  23. Eppler M., Forbes Öste H., Bresciani S. (2013). An Experimental Evaluation onthe Impact of Visual Facilitation Modes on Idea Generation in Teams. London: IEEE Proceedings of the 16th International Conference Information Visualization IV13, 15-18 July 2013.
  24. Eppler M., Burkhard R. (2004). Knowledge Visualization. Towards a New Discipline and Its Fields of Application. Research Paper, 07-02. Lugano: University of the Italian Switzerland.
  25. Friedlander M.J., Andrews L., Armstrong E.G., Aschenbrenner C., Kass J.S.,
  26. Odgen P., Schwartzstein R., Viggiano T.R. (2011). What Medical Education Can Learn From Neurobiology of Learning?, “Academic Medicine”, 86-4.
  27. Gardner H. (2010). Education for the New Century, in B. Bertagni, M. La Rosa,
  28. F. Salvetti (Eds.), Learn How to Learn! Knowledge Society, Education and Training. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  29. Gross R. (2010). Psychology. The Science of Mind and Behaviour, London: Hodder, London.
  30. Grzega J., Schöner M. (2008). The Didactic Lodel LdL (Lernen durch Lehren) as a Model of Preparing Students for Knowledge Societies. In: “Journal of Education for Teaching” (JET), vol. 34, n. 3.
  31. Howe N., Strauss W. (2000). Millenials Rising: the Next Great Generation. New York: Vintage books.
  32. Jensen E. (2008). Brain-Based Learning: The New Science of Teaching & Learning. California: Corwin press.
  33. Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.
  34. Koulopoulos T., Keldsen D. (2014). The Gen Z Effect: The Six Forces Shaping the Future of Business. Bibliomotion.
  35. Krum, Randy Cool Infographics: Effective Communication with Data Visualization and Design, Wiley
  36. Land and Sea Infographic - www.livescience.com/29536-infographic-tallestmountain-to-deepest-ocean-trench.html
  37. Lankow J., Ritchie J., Crooks R. (2012). The Power of Visual Storytelling. Wiley.
  38. Lester P.M. (2013). Visual Communication: Images with Messages. Sixth Edition. Lutgens F. (2006). The Rise of life. London: Roxby Prehistory Press.
  39. Mc Candless D. (2009). Information is Beautiful. London: Collins.
  40. Mc Luhan M., Powers B. (1999). The Global Village: Trasformations in Worldlife and Media in the 21st Century. New York: University Press.
  41. Merleau-Ponty M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
  42. MIT (December 19, 1996). Research-Brain Processing of Visual Information, MIT News
  43. Munari B. (1993). Design e comunicazione visiva. Contributo ad una metodologia didattica. Bari: Laterza.
  44. Pinker S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.
  45. Roam D. (2008). The Back of the Napkin. Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures. London: Penguin.
  46. Salvetti F. (2013). Learning Environments. In Amicucci F., Gabrielli G. (Eds.). Boundaryless Learning. Nuove strategie e strumenti di formazione. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  47. Salvetti F., Bertagni B. (2014a). e-REAL: Enhanced Reality Lab. In: International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, vol. 7, n. 3.
  48. Salvetti F., Bertagni B. (2014b). e-REAL: Enhancing Intelligence by Visual Thinking. Presentation Paper. New York: International Conference on e-Learning in the Workplace - Columbia University.
  49. Salvetti S. (2014). Summer Love. In: 2014 Young Authors Fiction Festival. Paris: The American Library.
  50. Smith B.L., MacGregor J.T. (1992). What is collaborative learning?. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment at Pennsylvania State University.
  51. Spector J.M., Merrill M.D., Elen J., Bishop M.J (2014). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer.
  52. Spiro R.J., Jehng J.C. (1990). Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext. In: Nix D.,
  53. Spiro R.J. (Eds.). Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Explorations in High Technology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  54. Wunenburger J.J. (1997). Philosophie des images. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Barbara Bertagni, Dealing with complexity in a simple way: How visualization boosts understanding in learning process. The Z Generation case in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 137/2015, pp 201-2015, DOI: 10.3280/SL2015-137012