Clicca qui per scaricare

Torino smart city. Circolazione, riproduzione e adattamento di un’idea di città
Titolo Rivista: ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI 
Autori/Curatori: Silvia Crivello 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2014 Fascicolo: 111 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  17 P. 32-48 Dimensione file:  97 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2014-111002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


L’articolo propone un’analisi sociologica dell’idea di smart city, investigandone i processi di generazione, circolazione e riproduzione, i meccanismi di mobilità, assemblaggio e radicamento e individuandone traiettorie evolutive nel contesto sociale, economico, istituzionale della città di Torino. Nelle conclusioni, si argomenta come il concetto di smart city non si riferisca tanto a una politica dal contenuto normativo ben definito, quanto piuttosto a un immaginario urbano carico di valenze prescrittive, al momento, apparentemente flessibili ed adattabili a razionalità politiche differenti.


Keywords: Torino; smart city; politiche; mobilità; circolazione

  1. Castells M. (1996). Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age. Cambridge: Blackwell. Castells M. and Hall P. (1994). Technopoles of the World. London: Routledge.
  2. Coe A., Paquet G. and Roy J. (2001). E-Governance and Smart Communities. A Social Learning Challenge, Social Science Computer Review, 19(1): 80-93.
  3. Cook I.R. (2008), Mobilising urban policies: The policy transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales. Urban Studies, 45(4): 773-795.
  4. Dolowitz D. and Marsh D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2): 343-357.
  5. Eger J. (1997). Smart Growth, Smart Cities, and the Crisis at the Pump. A Worldwide Phenomenon. I-Ways: The Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, 32(1): 47-53.
  6. Florida R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Florida R. (2008). Who’s your city? New York: Basic Books.
  8. Fraser N. (2003). From discipline to flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations, 10: 160-171.
  9. Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., Pichler-Milanovic N. and Meijers E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities, disponibile al sito: http://www.smart-cities.eu.
  10. Graham S. and Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
  11. Graham S. and Marvin S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities, and the urban condition, London: Routledge.
  12. Harvey D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1): 3-17.
  13. Hollands R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3): 303-320.
  14. Marsh D. and Sharman J.C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3): 269-288.
  15. McCann E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A, 40(4): 885-904.
  16. McCann E. (2010). Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101, 1: 107-130.
  17. McCann E. (2011a). Veritable inventions: Cities, policy and assemblage. Area, 43(2): 143-147.
  18. McCann E. (2011b). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1): 107-130.
  19. McCann E. and Ward K. (2010). Relationality/territoriality: toward a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum, 41(2): 175-184.
  20. Peck J. (2002). Political economics of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography, 78: 331-360.
  21. Peck J. (2003). Geography and public policy: Mapping the penal state. Progress in Human Geography, 27: 222-232. Peck J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29: 740-770.
  22. Peck J. and Theodore N. (2001). Exporting workfare/importingwelfare-to-work: Exploring the politics of Third Way policy transfer. Political Geography, 20: 427-460.
  23. Peck J. and Theodore N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41: 169-174.
  24. Peck J. and Tickell A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34: 380-404.
  25. Pieterse J.N. (2009). Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  26. Prince R.J. (2010). Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 42(1): 169-186.
  27. Prince R.J. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2): 188-203.
  28. Rose R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
  29. Simmons B.A., Dobbin F. and Garrett G. (2008). Introduction: The diffusion of liberalization. In: Simmons B.A., Dobbin F. and Garrett G., eds., The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Smart Growth Network (2013). http:www.smartgrowth.org (ultimo accesso 01/03/2013).
  31. Thorns D. (2002). The Transformation of Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  32. Walker J.L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states”. American Political Science Review, 63(3): 880-899.

Silvia Crivello, in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 111/2014, pp. 32-48, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2014-111002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche