Click here to download

Torino Smart City. Circulation, reproduction and adaptation of an idea of a city
Journal Title: ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI 
Author/s: Silvia Crivello 
Year:  2014 Issue: 111 Language: Italian 
Pages:  17 Pg. 32-48 FullText PDF:  97 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2014-111002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The article offers a sociological analysis of the idea of smart city, investigating the processes of production, mobilization and reproduction, as well as the assemblage and the embedding in the social, economic and institutional fabric of the city of Turin. The paper argues that the concept of smart city does not refer to a welldefined policy idea, but rather to an urban imaginary with flexible and adaptable prescriptive contents, ready to be coupled with different political rationalities.
Keywords: Turin; smart city; policies; mobility; circulation

  1. Castells M. (1996). Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age. Cambridge: Blackwell. Castells M. and Hall P. (1994). Technopoles of the World. London: Routledge.
  2. Coe A., Paquet G. and Roy J. (2001). E-Governance and Smart Communities. A Social Learning Challenge, Social Science Computer Review, 19(1): 80-93.
  3. Cook I.R. (2008), Mobilising urban policies: The policy transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales. Urban Studies, 45(4): 773-795.
  4. Dolowitz D. and Marsh D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2): 343-357.
  5. Eger J. (1997). Smart Growth, Smart Cities, and the Crisis at the Pump. A Worldwide Phenomenon. I-Ways: The Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, 32(1): 47-53.
  6. Florida R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Florida R. (2008). Who’s your city? New York: Basic Books.
  8. Fraser N. (2003). From discipline to flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations, 10: 160-171.
  9. Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., Pichler-Milanovic N. and Meijers E. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities, disponibile al sito: http://www.smart-cities.eu.
  10. Graham S. and Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
  11. Graham S. and Marvin S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities, and the urban condition, London: Routledge.
  12. Harvey D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1): 3-17.
  13. Hollands R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3): 303-320.
  14. Marsh D. and Sharman J.C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3): 269-288.
  15. McCann E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A, 40(4): 885-904.
  16. McCann E. (2010). Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101, 1: 107-130.
  17. McCann E. (2011a). Veritable inventions: Cities, policy and assemblage. Area, 43(2): 143-147.
  18. McCann E. (2011b). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1): 107-130.
  19. McCann E. and Ward K. (2010). Relationality/territoriality: toward a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum, 41(2): 175-184.
  20. Peck J. (2002). Political economics of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography, 78: 331-360.
  21. Peck J. (2003). Geography and public policy: Mapping the penal state. Progress in Human Geography, 27: 222-232. Peck J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29: 740-770.
  22. Peck J. and Theodore N. (2001). Exporting workfare/importingwelfare-to-work: Exploring the politics of Third Way policy transfer. Political Geography, 20: 427-460.
  23. Peck J. and Theodore N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41: 169-174.
  24. Peck J. and Tickell A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34: 380-404.
  25. Pieterse J.N. (2009). Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  26. Prince R.J. (2010). Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 42(1): 169-186.
  27. Prince R.J. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2): 188-203.
  28. Rose R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
  29. Simmons B.A., Dobbin F. and Garrett G. (2008). Introduction: The diffusion of liberalization. In: Simmons B.A., Dobbin F. and Garrett G., eds., The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Smart Growth Network (2013). http:www.smartgrowth.org (ultimo accesso 01/03/2013).
  31. Thorns D. (2002). The Transformation of Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  32. Walker J.L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states”. American Political Science Review, 63(3): 880-899.

Silvia Crivello, Torino Smart City. Circulation, reproduction and adaptation of an idea of a city in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 111/2014, pp. 32-48, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2014-111002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content